From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D7B2BF1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  1 Mar 2018 15:41:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 01 Mar 2018 06:41:21 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,408,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="21786456"
Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155])
 by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2018 06:41:19 -0800
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.188]) by
 IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.10]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002;
 Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:41:18 +0000
From: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
To: "Verma, Shally" <Shally.Verma@cavium.com>, Ahmed Mansour
 <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
CC: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>, "Athreya,
 Narayana Prasad" <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>, "Gupta, Ashish"
 <Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>, "Sahu, Sunila" <Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>, "Challa,
 Mahipal" <Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>, "Jain, Deepak K"
 <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>, Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, "Roy
 Pledge" <roy.pledge@nxp.com>, Youri Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>, "Trahe,
 Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] compressdev: implement API
Thread-Index: AQHTnFNA34V0d0oQkkqZkaaruzarZKO35fiAgAJP7eCAAOa9gIAAgLBg
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:41:17 +0000
Message-ID: <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B43589329F78@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1517595924-25963-1-git-send-email-fiona.trahe@intel.com>
 <12544144.czVLKRyaz4@xps>
 <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B43589325187@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <DB3PR0402MB38526FF01E8A29D9CA8D70F1E1C30@DB3PR0402MB3852.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CY4PR0701MB3634DA710D8EC11BF60A688AF0C10@CY4PR0701MB3634.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <DB3PR0402MB3852AB6E2BB21C85FE9E6B15E1C10@DB3PR0402MB3852.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <MWHPR0701MB364183B1F3D3E0AE0B5FF83CF0C00@MWHPR0701MB3641.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B4358932983C@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <CY4PR0701MB3634E08FB097B9D530C73FBFF0C60@CY4PR0701MB3634.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR0701MB3634E08FB097B9D530C73FBFF0C60@CY4PR0701MB3634.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiOTkzNGJmODMtYzQzNS00OTA1LThlZWEtZTJlYjY5MmJlZDdjIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjUuOS4zIiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkFFaUpcL0lOUkhrbTc3VFwvUHhoNzJ1ellhUkVBMitSclNcL1dRQzQ2WEE5aXM9In0=
x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.0.116
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] compressdev: implement API
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:41:25 -0000

Hi Shally

//snip//
> [Shally] This looks better to me. So it mean app would always call xform_=
init() for stateless and attach an
> updated priv_xform to ops (depending upon if there's shareable or not). S=
o it does not need to have
> NULL pointer on priv_xform. right?
>=20
[Fiona] yes. The PMD must return a valid priv_xform pointer.