From: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
To: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Lilijun (Jerry)" <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>,
xudingke <xudingke@huawei.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 07:00:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34EFBCA9F01B0748BEB6B629CE643AE60D09900C@dggemm513-mbx.china.huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c7becd3-4d64-0e20-ea16-d1bd7b4bd6a2@intel.com>
Hi, Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Guo [mailto:jia.guo@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 2:05 PM
> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>; xudingke
> <xudingke@huawei.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: fix memory leak when removing
> event_cb
>
> hi, yunjian
>
> On 7/2/2020 7:47 PM, wangyunjian wrote:
> > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> >
> > The event_cb->dev_name is not freed when freeing event_cb, and this
> > causes a memory leak.
> >
> > Fixes: a753e53d517b ("eal: add device event monitor framework")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > index 9e4f09d..4cfdb80 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c
> > @@ -526,6 +526,8 @@ static int cmp_dev_name(const struct rte_device
> *dev, const void *_name)
> > */
> > if (event_cb->active == 0) {
> > TAILQ_REMOVE(&dev_event_cbs, event_cb, next);
> > + if (event_cb->dev_name)
> > + free(event_cb->dev_name);
> > free(event_cb);
> > ret++;
> > } else {
>
>
> After you check, don't you think the memory leak would not occur in
> rte_dev_event_callback_register when free event_cb? And if you have find
> other same problem, suggest to fix it wholly by this good chance. Thanks.
>
Yes, I've confirmed that it's not necessary. The 'event_cb->dev_name' is not allocated
memory on error path in rte_dev_event_callback_register(). But I find the return value
is wrong, when the callback is already exist, will include it in next version.
The similar bugs I found in other codes will be fixed in another patches.
Thanks,
Yunjian
> int
> rte_dev_event_callback_register(const char *device_name,
> rte_dev_event_cb_fn cb_fn,
> void *cb_arg)
> {
>
> error:
> free(event_cb);
> rte_spinlock_unlock(&dev_event_lock);
> return ret;
>
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 12:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fixes for device event wangyunjian
2020-06-03 12:54 ` wangyunjian
2020-06-03 12:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb wangyunjian
2020-06-03 12:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eal: fix remove incorrect event_cb wangyunjian
2020-06-12 5:56 ` Jeff Guo
2020-06-30 11:29 ` wangyunjian
2020-06-30 11:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb wangyunjian
2020-07-02 9:28 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-02 10:53 ` wangyunjian
2020-07-02 11:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] fixes for device event wangyunjian
2020-07-02 11:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: fix memory leak when removing event_cb wangyunjian
2020-07-03 6:04 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-03 7:00 ` wangyunjian [this message]
2020-07-03 7:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2020-07-03 7:52 ` wangyunjian
2020-07-03 8:01 ` David Marchand
2020-07-02 11:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal: return error code when failure wangyunjian
2020-06-03 12:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] " wangyunjian
2020-07-02 9:18 ` Jeff Guo
2020-07-02 10:43 ` wangyunjian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34EFBCA9F01B0748BEB6B629CE643AE60D09900C@dggemm513-mbx.china.huawei.com \
--to=wangyunjian@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerry.lilijun@huawei.com \
--cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xudingke@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).