From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "You, KaisenX" <kaisenx.you@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Zhou, YidingX" <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"Matz, Olivier" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"zhoumin@loongson.cn" <zhoumin@loongson.cn>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] enhance NUMA affinity heuristic
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:12:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3535353.LM0AJKV5NW@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB6765D0DB7801183B0F5F4DB9E1609@SJ0PR11MB6765.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
21/04/2023 04:34, You, KaisenX:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > 13/04/2023 02:56, You, KaisenX:
> > > From: You, KaisenX
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not comfortable with this patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > First, there is no comment in the code which helps to understand the
> > logic.
> > > > > Second, I'm afraid changing the value of the per-core variable
> > > > > _socket_id may have an impact on some applications.
> > > > >
> > > Hi Thomas, I'm sorry to bother you again, but we can't think of a
> > > better solution for now, would you please give me some suggestion, and
> > then I will modify it accordingly.
> >
> > You need to better explain the logic
> > both in the commit message and in code comments.
> > When it will be done, it will be easier to have a discussion with other
> > maintainers and community experts.
> > Thank you
> >
> Thank you for your reply, I'll explain my patch in more detail next.
>
> When a DPDK application is started on only one numa node,
What do you mean by started on only one node?
> memory is allocated for only one socket.
> When interrupt threads use memory, memory may not be found
> on the socket where the interrupt thread is currently located,
Why interrupt thread is on a different socket?
> and memory has to be reallocated on the hugepage,
> this operation can lead to performance degradation.
>
> So my modification is in the function malloc_get_numa_socket to make sure
> that the first socket with memory can be returned.
>
> If you can accept my explanation and modification, I will send the V6
> version to improve the commit message and code comments.
>
> > > > Thank you for your reply.
> > > > First, about comments, I can submit a new patch to add comments to
> > > > help understand.
> > > > Second, if you do not change the value of the per-core variable_
> > > > socket_ id, /lib/eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> > > > malloc_get_numa_socket(void)
> > > > {
> > > > const struct internal_config *conf = eal_get_internal_configuration();
> > > > unsigned int socket_id = rte_socket_id(); // The return value of
> > > > "rte_socket_id()" is 1
> > > > unsigned int idx;
> > > >
> > > > if (socket_id != (unsigned int)SOCKET_ID_ANY)
> > > > return socket_id; //so return here
> > > >
> > > > This will cause return here, This function returns the socket_id of
> > > > unallocated memory.
> > > >
> > > > If you have a better solution, I can modify it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-21 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-21 10:48 [PATCH] malloc: " David Marchand
2022-12-21 11:16 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-21 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-21 14:57 ` David Marchand
2022-12-27 9:00 ` zhoumin
2023-01-03 10:56 ` David Marchand
2023-01-03 10:58 ` [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2023-01-03 13:32 ` [PATCH v3] " David Marchand
2023-01-31 3:23 ` You, KaisenX
2023-01-31 15:05 ` [PATCH v4] net/iavf:enhance " Kaisen You
2023-01-31 16:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-01 5:32 ` You, KaisenX
2023-02-01 12:20 ` [PATCH v5] enhance " Kaisen You
2023-02-01 10:52 ` Jiale, SongX
2023-02-15 14:22 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-02-15 14:47 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-02-16 2:50 ` You, KaisenX
2023-03-03 14:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-03-09 1:58 ` You, KaisenX
2023-04-13 0:56 ` You, KaisenX
2023-04-19 12:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-21 2:34 ` You, KaisenX
2023-04-21 8:12 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2023-04-23 6:52 ` You, KaisenX
2023-04-23 8:57 ` You, KaisenX
2023-04-23 13:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-25 5:16 ` [PATCH v6] " Kaisen You
2023-04-27 6:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-16 5:19 ` You, KaisenX
2023-05-23 2:50 ` [PATCH v7] " Kaisen You
2023-05-23 10:44 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-26 6:44 ` You, KaisenX
2023-05-23 12:45 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-26 6:50 ` [PATCH v8] " Kaisen You
2023-05-26 8:45 ` Kaisen You
2023-05-26 14:44 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-05-26 17:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-29 10:37 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-06-01 14:42 ` David Marchand
2023-06-06 14:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-12 9:36 ` Burakov, Anatoly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3535353.LM0AJKV5NW@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kaisenx.you@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yidingx.zhou@intel.com \
--cc=zhoumin@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).