From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Arnon Warshavsky <arnon@qwilt.com>
Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: register rte_panic user callback
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:04:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35390785.Gg18XPo1UR@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKy9EB2ZfCf98V0O3pCPWe0eBwWFMvkv+HvQm-C1ToNTc6Sx5g@mail.gmail.com>
07/03/2018 12:02, Arnon Warshavsky:
> > > Can this really go into current release without deprecation notices?
> >
> > If such an exception is done, it must be approved by the technical board.
> > We need to check few criterias:
> > - which functions need to be changed
> > - how the application is impacted
> > - what is the urgency
> >
> > If a panic is removed and the application is not already checking some
> > error code, the execution will continue without considering the error.
> >
>
> > Some rte_panic could be probably removed without any impact on
> > applications.
> > Some rte_panic could wait for 18.08 with a notice in 18.05.
> > If some rte_panic cannot wait, it must be discussed specifically.
> >
>
> Every panic removal must be handled all the way up in all call paths.
> If not all instances can be removed at once in 18.05 (which seems to be the
> case)
> maybe we should keep the callback patch until all the remains are gone.
Why introducing a new API for a temporary solution?
It has always been like that, so the remaining occurences could wait
one more release, isn't it?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-07 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 18:28 Arnon Warshavsky
2018-03-07 8:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-07 8:57 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2018-03-07 9:05 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-07 9:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-07 11:02 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2018-03-07 15:04 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-03-07 16:26 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2018-03-07 11:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-03-07 13:23 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2018-03-07 15:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-03-07 16:31 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2018-03-07 17:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35390785.Gg18XPo1UR@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=arnon@qwilt.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).