From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0FD2EDA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  2 Jun 2015 18:26:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so64494082wib.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=hxO1ECgK3A7OqaE6354mF03yS9Occq/GcfltPyKWZmM=;
 b=MK8N6ZoIgSK4bA20OdwH/oBISbfjBv5fE4XTpOh6GhQIpUFUp13f+oQ4T3KOkN/mFx
 FVE/VxWdJw0n0QFai2goNcP8WAVJli/qglso4BCgtFB1/NXZVGY7DQVQCjLjdikBTk9f
 k9MYgeOoE4adfduR6dZ+AKuuuUpymrZ2cPrJ73S+ekYgkk9LA0vAV95oKJdIlJNRx8xQ
 IpWe86mKwQFSOBZtXBkkhM6PZxWND5imBM+sS++tg2dzH5oWifwwvEa1fpXfr+OXlUzs
 VGK8hKNkrcVIyw6HzNx+RC1vQiy4FwzQvuMr/1xng1nrEwKXN4w/8Xv5Yd6seGpaFajG
 wjQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlt4/8UM//+a1lG7rLnPCeaBETofm2nLChTOePs0tHtBrMSFureWg07BuOTxe5YCr4YFPzw
X-Received: by 10.194.82.38 with SMTP id f6mr50237582wjy.16.1433262371710;
 Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ul1sm18560846wjc.30.2015.06.02.09.26.10
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 02 Jun 2015 09:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:25:23 +0200
Message-ID: <3539466.NVFWZvGBW0@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A86DC27@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1432776978-24998-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
 <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A86DC27@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config:enlarge the default value
	of	RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT to 1024
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:26:12 -0000

2015-06-01 01:00, Zhang, Helin:
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jijiang Liu
> > The default value of RTE_MAX_QUEUES_PER_PORT is 256, which is too small for
> > some configurations for i40e. There will return an error when configured queue
> > number is larger than 256 in
> > rte_eth_dev_configure().
> > 
> > For example, in vHost sample, PF queue number: 64, configured vmdq pool
> > number: 63, each vmdq pool has 4 queues, there will be required 316 queues in a
> > port.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>

Applied, thanks