From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0185A0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:44:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262971DBA4; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:44:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00251DBA3 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984D6351; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:44:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:44:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=kGL8uHZ1BjQnRL2k9WwuM/CqLBxnNbHILshSPmdaYGI=; b=DSg3sV6+iuBV CQaZ3nAJ+9jjZw1Pawha8GqQGiMeQd0S8bP7wKz4pq/3yAyCRGQNklWwDYEQab6Q TonSbMVxxDWTdDveDXyrPRJ+FFBMSYC8xJX241clMPk0I7G5swhA4/Ti7XkTVT5W rqcoE6w6/LBI1tInsYp5+Za0grhUHw0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kGL8uHZ1BjQnRL2k9WwuM/CqLBxnNbHILshSPmdaY GI=; b=R/S2vp957Xyfy+FQfc4OiTVOlgsI4WRGwDBlhKaKXQSqbM1mNAjAaaCrF ZNnLZ/Cv67K77ODXUSDzdgDBGJf2401J4cMGjb5qvxso2u65WRLl6AktZLr6wVOt fj7VWowipDlrNB0NnIFVXHOLUq9IoQhYH02MvnJB1BEyuwXp/9U78YJQnOSRTHkq hiV9FZpIQk7LYHxcvo9/bcX3o66zvHITQw3aOELiHgm0sCJfil+u69lPxdQskMvg 0QM89dAIWpmpK1vta4h+2yaef/Eg9I2GXSvuECB/4fbvYqbC0gKnVXrZHtpn9eds lKxgKVGPe1IKv3i52FQriDup9/VIg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfeehgddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 84AB03280063; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:44:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vladimir Medvedkin Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: <3563105.IFkqi6BYcA@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1586370739-61729-2-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> References: <1586370739-61729-1-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> <1586370739-61729-2-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test: update hash performance tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/04/2020 20:32, Vladimir Medvedkin: > Add preformance test for rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data() Why is it a separate patch? To me, it is natural to add such test when adding a new hash API. So they should be in the same patch.