From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01492952 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:31:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2017 01:31:16 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,252,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="72656398" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.191.192]) ([10.254.191.192]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2017 01:31:14 -0800 To: Shahaf Shuler , nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com References: <1488366702-51373-1-git-send-email-shahafs@mellanox.com> <1488445291-24637-1-git-send-email-shahafs@mellanox.com> <8379d78f-4448-f6b3-0f24-5ab23561a3af@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <36403dfc-932b-65a4-a527-c33de20074d2@intel.com> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:31:14 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8379d78f-4448-f6b3-0f24-5ab23561a3af@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] net/mlx5: add hardware TSO support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:31:18 -0000 On 3/6/2017 8:50 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 3/2/2017 9:01 AM, Shahaf Shuler wrote: >> Implement support for hardware TSO. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler >> --- >> on v3: >> * fix alignment issues >> * for warn log >> on v2: >> * Instead of exposing capability, TSO checks on data path. >> * PMD specific parameter to enable TSO. >> * different implementaion for the data path. >> Performance impact ~0.1-0.2Mpps > > Hi Shahaf, > > I think it is good idea to update release notes to announce mlx5 TSO > support, what do you think? Since [1] depends on this patch, I will get both, but can you please send a separate patch for release notes? [1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/21065/ > > And if you will send a new version of the patch, can you please put > "TSO" flag in the same order with default.ini I will update this. > > Thanks, > ferruh >