From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD28459AF; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:04:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D1F4025F; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:04:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fout7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.150]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C11040150 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:04:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.phl.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE7D1380293; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:04:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:04:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1726495454; x=1726581854; bh=GRShHzHJvRftauC0GzLYamoHe/cgdIcb+L73/H4se0s=; b= d2osKQ7Tj16CQrwu9nAyhu8bWs1yBRz0yKg9aWJWGrBXRlOVJW7Or7TEFwZ0HlX0 8fzZIWsvFkq5Z1Nk6Y2QY2S8TevzI4IxOtV5tsSFodZAQi/wjSgZCnPY9Dbam6nO rjEyoCrSKCyoqhA8pOrsBGuSDNzHUmvglVXWTaFRFNnn9Q6U/vF47DZH7+keUzzU 0lo0b1B/dlJH6HSomemuNpb9FhzBPjSsPAAc5X1OGemKstQpHgj7lMiohQLvXN7Q eB/O5Efy6Uwa6SLfnVmrIaadiFjJp1DZq0cqO+VvPNdTp8OzZwMz4R9j4vIpPUIf WvWsS4WPY5TsxrU5mBncEQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1726495454; x= 1726581854; bh=GRShHzHJvRftauC0GzLYamoHe/cgdIcb+L73/H4se0s=; b=X Nm+lTq+Bvmbx/6aH/aU+lh/HF8J0UvaphUEvf3DAtFIiyvvrT3CCj550BOG8qPLE b7pIDqYA1k5toe/56a8baACHIKqQnyeVBgEYu7cXV12kFcp2ktOBEVj2y8CSLcwf jDM//cInfh2nL+TJ742BFRMd27iIT01r1qTeZ2TJ+bSUoqCaYwaEdeYUh5NP2+Zc M8GmwBNXbBEgHqdZ/s+R7FA8VmoPCoeM0eaa6QjoZYEUrBbhvBA8m/Gu4tpskK7t XDiEe+SJhsB5RPoWUW8Km+99UWNmwUMlE0FdvBXGU3W7EnD0R+QGnzcWNUcZ73Mm KN2WjA6MyohitywlzZ/6g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudekhedgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeen ucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrg hlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegtddtleejjeegffekkeektdejvedt heevtdekiedvueeuvdeiuddvleevjeeujeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtpdhn sggprhgtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmsgessh hmrghrthhshhgrrhgvshihshhtvghmshdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehhohhnnhgrphhp rgdrnhgrghgrrhgrhhgrlhhlihesrghrmhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhgvfi drrhihsggthhgvnhhkohesohhkthgvthhlrggsshdrrhhupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvvhes ughpughkrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepfhgvnhhgtghhvghnghifvghnsehhuhgrfigvih drtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegsrhhutggvrdhrihgthhgrrhgushhonhesihhnthgvlhdr tghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:04:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Morten =?UTF-8?B?QnLDuHJ1cA==?= Cc: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, dev@dpdk.org, fengchengwen@huawei.com, Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] mempool: test performance with larger bursts Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:04:11 +0200 Message-ID: <3640825.iIbC2pHGDl@thomas> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F6EC@smartserver.smartshare.dk> References: <20240121045249.22465-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com> <3010150.e9J7NaK4W3@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F6EC@smartserver.smartshare.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 16/09/2024 15:08, Morten Br=C3=B8rup: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > Sent: Monday, 16 September 2024 14.41 > >=20 > > 13/09/2024 16:58, Morten Br=C3=B8rup: > > > PING for apply. > > > > > > Patch has 2 acks. > > > And since it was signed off by a co-maintainer (myself), > > > I don't think an ack from the other co-maintainer (Andrew) is require= d. > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong? > >=20 > >=20 > > It's not a matter of acks. > >=20 > > I feel we should reduce from 5 seconds to 1 second as part of this patc= h. >=20 > As mentioned below, I was worried about reducing the test duration. > If you think the test will be accurate enough, I can easily reduce it to = 1; you're not the only person annoyed by the long test duration. I cannot be sure but it's probably worth to try. > > But seeing there is no more comments, I suppose I should apply this ver= sion. >=20 > Should I send v8 with reduced test duration from 5 to 1 second? If you agree to try this duration, yes please send a v8.