From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB2BA0526; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:56:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B791BFD4; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:56:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517D91BFBB; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE4F5C01A4; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:56:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:56:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= m3oTeVwrCHkQOaqwmLiRuUDVo94AMQr3Z6ke9ZjinoE=; b=s7fHbZS25wVwIwjN okOEoxx7XeTTVTSTGOmrP+7VV3Fk2ajShEkzttVRP5iihl8R7BQuXqy0jsnwKA+R rTyDTI4fBzSBySG3rYXtWKz1+aXHndwd4bx/03UfdL4k8cvClLr1rINfeCjjQ4r2 2hSSSvIJPWAeIi/sJK5/xRCzacxr8FlnoyY3p66QgVmiX8ow0ST0vSbihtG2tn5S 6w4IaXmto8hwyroRaYMCsot51kR+IH4nNsl7/llWI88hte3wq5nknOFFyOHc8s+0 jSrOGd5Dh2FymAQPuhaApDJ2MZ8jL613O+1WFpy3rL5dixA46wBX/Yi8t0bQDBqx 5QG7GQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=m3oTeVwrCHkQOaqwmLiRuUDVo94AMQr3Z6ke9Zjin oE=; b=C3uicZWHdWzzeVS94elu7kHf+GuEZ4ia+986Qu0NoVGizSGkwR55+6ety 9k+nNUKo9KvBjC9kds9KimCmu9UQW61wF3jKRMWMuWYSLI5n1KfMapjCl5DyQWOX MC7uujVM/R3jff0gQrS4t326lHhQ5G7lTgCr05/TNmJwA6FS8wMbWzuE+lL9Lajd FOE036H/VqkBE1raoZKJFiPFFRwh9Yo2KtDuF9F8MraSjzAfXJCJLK1hv6KYEWFY UPRY1+Do64LtP0DFZUnJLWUolt4kU5tha+xYZc1LboZ2P/H79TcOnX2kCy1OhIQz KEK5S3uX+JkUv3WUkuOmkwhVorNVg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrgeelgddutdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D73130600A3; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 04:56:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Cc: "Andrzej Ostruszka [C]" , Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , Stephen Hemminger , dpdk-dev , techboard@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:56:38 +0200 Message-ID: <3669914.27dMEtFVk2@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200306164104.15528-1-aostruszka@marvell.com> <1734533.zqhfolzEdB@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: introduce IF Proxy library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/07/2020 10:45, Jerin Jacob: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:10 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > In addition may I ask your opinion on the changes that are required > > > before the library can be accepted? > > > > Very few contributors take time to look at it. > > Clearly we want this feature. We really want it, > > but we are not able to dedicate enough time for its review (blaming myself). > > That's why I Cc the techboard to try a new process: > > > > For such feature requiring a community design, > > and not having enough feedback to progress in a timely manner, > > I propose drafting the design in a Technical Board meeting > > (a regular or specific one). > > Since the patch series already have the documentation for library[1], > example application [2] > in addition to the implementation. > For everyone's benefit, it would good to know what is the expectation > of draft design so that one can create > such a document as part of the new process and it can apply for new > another library. > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71953/ > [2] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71956/ I don't understand Jerin. What is your question? Are you proposing to include a design document as part of the patches? In my opinion, the cover letter is a good place to explain a design.