From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA11A0561; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:13:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0733B1D680; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:13:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EA31D63E for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:13:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D2E2CC; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:13:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= iz5vksbBFU0CPg/kWwivhWGho+If0G0bLZ+hatCT3uU=; b=Xg9s8GgoaxdUahh7 lig4WTdrosiwME5s8yRKojV3TR99roiHOqBXClIJ1XiMThgHfaXguKLySA54RypF Bik/kS7kzaVn4G02iYXCJd+oTvXcljTczRmamRXLhGmSwv8a+IVQUzaX0emZvkuh u9GfdjtVqU37EIcDSleA1QlOcdll18ktduqYcVDz94aI1UUxPxKPoBNtk8HI8lhZ Um6whZm5tw630cBW4iAUg2999s5S0Trv9Cdr0CUJHyN/gjjKJCq09VhZOFRwRmA/ 70CuzxvtPw6PS8VHy1GHkn1XOuN4Uon5Iup7SPUX6IzQC8ZXFjZEj4p6Dk1D0VNn lAYCzA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=iz5vksbBFU0CPg/kWwivhWGho+If0G0bLZ+hatCT3 uU=; b=NvQ1uw1/5fl83rC1IomeXoWl3hgidABRKFzB8WdpVmsFEzBTvmEfOWVLJ f9HuKPk+qYdNqcYTlg1KXoqbfVO3VwTAbY2zdp41xv6dKnfeX09pY45nAd0scVxV sIFSehLjpxqtti4IiTEfeDpshHYSaTBGuysjeKdqGfEPgFmR/c7iaQ8Rxfc/16Gk C2c0Tl2VMr053kgWZtPuRCsv4UBRF3IxOBO41dsc8e23ji7+rM4mJMLAW8KZPbbE 8vPCLJGXBc7IwtHZVkjWTmI8nhryTkIYHgVO76419po2nQrL8EUZwjaZl2bIK0LJ rCL4CqZoT7PQxPH5Ta23vz8TNAhSQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgeefgddutdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EC24D328005D; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:13:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wang, Haiyue" Cc: David Marchand , dev , "Burakov, Anatoly" , Vamsi Attunuru , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Alex Williamson Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:13:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3674958.iIHpSLecBQ@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200305043311.17065-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] support for VFIO-PCI VF token interface X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/04/2020 19:02, Wang, Haiyue: > From: David Marchand > > > > Hello, > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 7:36 PM Haiyue Wang wrote: > > > > > > v8: Update the document. > > > > Thanks for the last version. > > I had a look at the CI, I can see we are still missing bits to handle > > the ABI failure on rte_vfio_setup_device. > > Yes, not handle it now. > > If 'rte_vfio_setup_device' can be internal, not official DPDK API, then __rte_internal > is the best way to handle ABI issue. Please could you help finishing integration of __rte_internal? This patch is blocked for now.