From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769652986 for ; Fri, 5 May 2017 17:36:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA3920655; Fri, 5 May 2017 11:36:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 May 2017 11:36:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Y6gUO+0OJBKkBgp vp23bK40JQBzYn8Xq/H1OVub7xTE=; b=j8NkETQGpOdRXprB6cZhqVo5pgD6/B+ 6kkvEopENM9PNRE2FbnxieuGLN6uEltoHzX7yhiJM6bYWHkoLtxc/v7GSWPPX+LO TBrKcd1DVc5ltwV9tB5oq1BZvmuOvOlqJmOvFnVkyfKqO3X4JLicBCWHZvklD1Xp 5U8t5q8rUsi8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=Y6gUO+0OJBKkBgpvp23bK40JQBzYn8Xq/H1OVub7xTE=; b=gfU93zgE kFtacHxKaxdV/TOaZSG/UTVmUgmGfeBNtP5RjMeFy0eQEiGkBqYrpkMxKHNh+QuA RJFzu5XMc9jqZg23CwwVAOmX5cK73BPrsU4+1SMr0bHdgdBE22HKvrqoGASjC9K6 H41KI5+5y5QwI8aQGV1p04g9/Xijv92IPC0PmFMWW5Jy/Hl7gpYEzyiXNISjaj5e ZfhHHF8EOoLsHhQllWsygmezcO3ya72Kzz02cOf7+1olVWZ6SwAlxo344EfN9H3u gtGq0YhlrzSpT8aSTjQbknRa4GhTSCrNE1xhZo2IlCtSExF0+si3thHjXvuxGEdC +ckCu6+iZtBEHg== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: xIftlqwI+iOlPj9nn0qJOL8ym3woGFjVPVGC8qYIlTH3 1493998567 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C4A957E315; Fri, 5 May 2017 11:36:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Qi Zhang Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, jing.d.chen@intel.com Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 17:36:06 +0200 Message-ID: <3707298.SRbvvbsTYA@xps> In-Reply-To: <1493530011-33557-1-git-send-email-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> References: <1493530011-33557-1-git-send-email-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fix memory overflow for 32 bit vPMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 15:36:08 -0000 30/04/2017 07:26, Qi Zhang: > The return mbuf points of RX path is possible be modified out of bound > with 32 bit vPMD. > The patch set fix for related drivers. > > Qi Zhang (3): > net/i40e: fix memory overflow for 32 bit vPMD > net/ixgbe: fix memory overflow for 32 bit vPMD > net/fm10k: fix memory overflow for 32 bit vPMD No comment on these patches, assuming they are OK. Applied, thanks