From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939708DA4 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:19:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so198155568wic.0 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:19:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=2A4LM4xoEBVUBFNsQ0+g4bpYxJKyenqv8rRyCkPPSaY=; b=h5WXlxp9CGCdibZE/ndn1fN04rOSTm21343C8QM5X6adiZZwC9szlnV0TJP4KZGcO/ DHJbd5PMzOGLu8dBNykJcE5rjX4MgWUIkS16Tq4xWjQTRbJIOTEoJ797RhJnBzh4byZr 6gJFlbxiuftOvGobe+34UkSQIRHGXZ1V28V7pi/Qfl6BPXm6GvceTuFUvSidC0lpN6tD iZdSQsJU9BDAlXYXhwb27IvaR6RtVChb6LBRiUQ8NbVGyyWR2bwK+v+R1zdskAWCEw2a cu+kcijsHa3ljSSzmelCBjcHL9ViDQvwu7XonF8sIEiV3WtLhRks0OfxbU6bpNaOOF8b RlDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=2A4LM4xoEBVUBFNsQ0+g4bpYxJKyenqv8rRyCkPPSaY=; b=TcWqEPSyu40KnIuqu7iFxROqvqlcE6SaxdZXBWuUPWCxnFtGtRsCOqDU7uOQbuX0/7 31/BMyUYiGgIYJWaGH4Al1sGW0RWF8JkHz4+kyzqOTxTtlbF4sqPFDW4k6S/E4gGbsJm 6D+8Aje3/UV+2QWJyRKkFSVZw9uTZK0uzuVilsH7p9PfI0Vv+PsMzByfqQNXmsFY6qjY D8OrjyVpvBUCuK59DJLyFx2rA+IDSYmo4VBCM6E5qG9K3Q1SH+uqceS+0Y3UgK2a1qEo TPqiWL0R0x4WgNF4/yGWGHxeSkX+P5eXRYONLiZuJk0WduG9B9Zm7Rk3uYRbcY1V0GNJ YPlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjzXPIFZH/qbW0k38uZn25Jpo6hgIky3hZyC0L/5e875+0xE5w+vsFVtK5/hFJYM8Dp5Ka X-Received: by 10.180.90.37 with SMTP id bt5mr2825188wib.7.1446038353370; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nd17sm5684122wic.22.2015.10.28.06.19.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:18:02 +0100 Message-ID: <3728647.dfuuoAIro7@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8D00B50@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1441936817-20767-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8D00B50@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix the wrong prompt for VF TSO X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:19:13 -0000 > > When setting TSO on VF ixgbe NICs, for example, 82599, x550, the prompt > > that TSO is not supported will be printed. But TSO is supported by VF ixgbe > > NICs. > > We should add TSO to the capability flag, so, we will not see the wrong > > prompt. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu > Acked-by: Jingjing Wu Applied, thanks