From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECC0A0556; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:42:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841F31BFFB; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:42:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006AE1BFE6 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:42:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0DE21321; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:42:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:42:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=ZoUSvS/CLH6/UI9Hjun0EY+J6vc3btupeIHCxhsiMkI=; b=ToXe3XHeln5z bxMlUIgt0MTXvQ6t47bJfmHaA3G7ib/af4T7BBneXiomhS2+xcUl1/1UJ/r39NKC OH10h4TJrKqp+g9RlkEvddUpBDxTd+ck3QT8rU3bSnRidJMU/PUfLxyDMo93TW/r A3ghjxbDHoQMtWE5uq1vXNvdc/bGMms= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ZoUSvS/CLH6/UI9Hjun0EY+J6vc3btupeIHCxhsiM kI=; b=hF4kmUH4dhsmBBmvjbyvRRe5tcutCm7UsV33B260R46jv/ON4S7ZryJHK EDx5EmvoV9yL72SZctT7sCuzv+/3DHOwawLAzFbvvAyuik6FujCGHA36+ANeM0sV Nq4sqPxhFGTdmlkVWL0JE10BkDoCzfqxR0o498Fc8o0eQ5dCzP7TTbovi7krtfFD pvYAJNOR3lw22zNFgBWsaHCL8Z6nOHcHp3gnmCF+b5cwcCNzo+0GwAvz16CygCsc NkQOeRfthm8OuWWQ68V0D9wDRpS3x3QPrjr7IBtB/iAT7C2yQvVvQKWM7mA3cKNZ AROC3vPwqe+7WTyehH5AAJXke9h7g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrkedvgddulecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 12104328009B; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:42:31 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand , Aaron Conole Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Michael Santana , Bruce Richardson Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:42:30 +0100 Message-ID: <3732162.jZfb76A358@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20200219194131.29417-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20200219194131.29417-5-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] ci: reorganise Travis jobs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 19/02/2020 22:39, Aaron Conole: > David Marchand writes: > > > Let's prune the jobs list to limit the amount of time spent by the robot > > in Travis. > > > > Since meson enables automatically the relevant components, there is not > > much gain in testing with extra_packages vs required_packages only. > > > > For a given arch/compiler/env combination, compilation is first tested > > in all jobs that run tests or build the docs or run the ABI checks. > > In the same context, for jobs that accumulates running tests, building > > the docs etc..., those steps are independent and can be split to save > > some cpu on Travis. > > > > With this, we go down from 21 to 15 jobs. > > > > Note: this patch requires a flush of the existing caches in Travis. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > > --- > > In general, I think the idea with required vs. extra was to have a build > that did the minimum required, and one that did all the packages (to > allow a minimum vs. full DPDK). > > At least, that's from > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/124007.html I think the benefit of a minimum build is to have a quick report, and easy to setup. > Not sure if that's still something anyone cares about. Given that Travis knows how to satisfy the dependencies, and that we must wait for all jobs to finish, I don't see any benefit of a minimal setup.