DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: change doc line length limit in contributors guide
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 19:18:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3737023.yBcUv04Hz8@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2332DB84E@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>

11/05/2017 18:11, Mcnamara, John:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > 
> > ...
> > > -* The recommended style for the DPDK documentation is to put sentences
> > on separate lines.
> > > -  This allows for easier reviewing of patches.
> > > -  Multiple sentences which are not separated by a blank line are joined
> > automatically into paragraphs, for example::
> > > +* Lines in sentences should be less than 80 characters and wrapped at
> > > +  words. Multiple sentences which are not separated by a blank line
> > > +are joined
> > > +  automatically into paragraphs.
> > 
> > Why not keep the recommendation of separating sentences?
> 
> This isn't a recommendation. It is just pointing out that lines and sentences
> are joined into paragraphs. Maybe that is obvious and doesn't need to be
> stated.

I'm talking about "The recommended style for the DPDK documentation is
to put sentences on separate lines."
I like this recommendation.

> > > +     testpmd -l 2-3 -n 4 \
> > > +             --vdev=virtio_user0,path=/dev/vhost-
> > net,queues=2,queue_size=1024 \
> > > +             -- -i --txqflags=0x0 --disable-hw-vlan --enable-lro \
> > > +             --enable-rx-cksum --txq=2 --rxq=2 --rxd=1024  --txd=1024
> > 
> > Garbage?
> 
> I hope not. I took it from one of the examples in the docs to demonstrate
> how a long command could be wrapped and still be functional. Should I
> clarify that more, or remove it?

Ah sorry, misreading the patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-11 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-11 14:09 John McNamara
2017-05-11 15:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-05-11 16:11   ` Mcnamara, John
2017-05-11 17:18     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-05-11 17:31       ` Iremonger, Bernard
2017-05-12  9:10         ` Mcnamara, John
2017-05-12  9:23           ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-05-16 14:20             ` Mcnamara, John
2017-05-16 14:37               ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-05-22  6:44               ` Yuanhan Liu
2017-06-04 10:26                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-05-12 12:34 ` Shreyansh Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3737023.yBcUv04Hz8@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).