From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB351AF03 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:49:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE5B20C89; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 03:49:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 03:49:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=MIVpPhExd97MQ3u dlHHVYOHvEUozx/Gd+kfCGmxpOqE=; b=kAMHEXa1KYkFz0z43ZmNSfGZ1foWiOl 48lOMVqYk85M8B7xh+b5SQ3jXN/VDn3IEDN6yBhBhkzsabHOwSCRrkJk5ykXTZMP v29V0lf08UWFElWyQ+j7dm71pyDSTurienVH7IwWfp74xg2SHY/V5rHjvUQ65QsP FgwiefpB5C2k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=MIVpPhExd97MQ3udlHHVYOHvEUozx/Gd+kfCGmxpOqE=; b=SBQGONWh ji9lJZBVbZ9UGiy47/PJaG3nKcJMGceNHJMaQNIwR0YjQsMAoEEMSWbPp+XViCxQ TD20bJotYO2TxWDLwcsytAsWB4fMaqfkMClq38XwFX+23AILfqANld3X6erjCiLs WaLNKsvFT4F2kGZTrPPqbO8KzEfCC3+5engaUs0+m9RZLB4MXTxxNZfgoPfhcRzz +f0c33hFDF1y2UqKDyUe/o7FzuiNNu0Zo4Olxw0QmI8Fekl9PaMEbhKC8rladNA1 XYWcUMA+azkTPe72esp+sBJwq3Seug1kE3P7iU9HdMivFLe+7D8In+Bu+SkbI/KY 4VlNfqfWwFv8rw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 1Q4dBS36CjrHxawW7xvX3LRgAnAh6JzZYkjT5OQhwtyq 1507535368 Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B6D3924038; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 03:49:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Yuanhan Liu , Luca Boccassi Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Mcnamara, John" Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:49:27 +0200 Message-ID: <3748687.9eGIfCGZ7i@xps> In-Reply-To: <20171009014420.GG1545@yliu-home> References: <2385365.XUACAUbIaV@xps> <20171009014420.GG1545@yliu-home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 07:49:29 -0000 09/10/2017 03:44, Yuanhan Liu: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we > > > > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would run in > > > > parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS. > > > > > > > > However, if order for this to happen the community will have to > > > > provide a maintainer, either for 17.11 LTS or for 16.11 LTS (to allow > > > > Yuanhan to move from 16.11 LTS maintenance to 17.11 LTS maintenance). > > > > > > > > Ideally this person should come from one of the OSVs. Either way if > > > > we don't get a volunteer we won't have a 17.11 LTS. > > > > > > > > Volunteers please step forward. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > Hello John, > > > > > > I was just about to write you :-) > > > > > > I am available to volunteer. I've just got permission from AT&T > > > management to dedicate some working hours every week to the project > > > (this is the reason why I didn't say anything on the spot - I needed to > > > ask first due to the time requirements). > > > > > > I am fine with either 16.11 or 17.11, whichever Yuanhan prefers. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Thanks a lot Luca, and welcome :) > > +1 :) > > > You will have to send me a public SSH key. > > And we may should have a short chat, about the scripts I used for managing > the stable/LTS releases. > > > Yuanhan, how do you prefer to split the workload? > > I'd prefer 17.11. > > Thanks. You mean that you are interested in managing 17.11 LTS yourself? So Luca would become the new maintainer of 16.11 LTS? Handshake?