From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A79590C for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:10:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so266594292wmv.1 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 07:10:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=Evb6LqgDAe+7v9mrUXHj3R1BRO7kua4iuz9MjPoWXRg=; b=MVPLUjqf7q+HYlrCRB5PD7OeIibOY4bqdQiTf9i2CKxRtJJUR3BYwfFEw3TZywQqSL nfQQcBu6zH2xczS2U3jfn+NqnqYE9BMUhR+sL/OnWJ1JpPgzHM2NVTgDT1I4do1CvCLC M2VUh6Px6B3z297SNG5I69hBLhpJ36yD79XEdBVpzsnd9LVm2aD8MpAVw5oNtmve77kF ojY7KzmjnaSF2vyLMn3vaG26ntvsCGY47kOPQsgE1buKGtrUwifBkkTb+s/fv5BHdaqY VzQhYlrU6EvX2niwd5rdM+TvPw95p0/Sin+f0Udkse+7BJxkKwHBvFDHlg5caphDROZ6 KlRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Evb6LqgDAe+7v9mrUXHj3R1BRO7kua4iuz9MjPoWXRg=; b=ANYtQRzq/bHdkQGg832BZHwVCHm8gfKehvniOBqtwEKdqGjxwiGPhTT0irmSbhCor4 F+UJfAxHrDIKPScA/YcXCWvRn6Rn8onpg7NIe87320kkb3ppjH2Ia9skB77rlRtluHLz OEwgSox6MQyWTykjmOpEemDidiJcfTOveYSg5KBS5lVHbaunQRmzuiP4qo18tSKLcayW Q8ea0UGf3AfafkirMV3AZ43kVh6QW7HO6QyCm1J/NMfjVS2ANuJvTcOA4lJTmDKoUfzk 5ccvvPoJ0qY48M2qMS2xDgMzVJpmXMpCkZA4Y1d94aQDktVyVxA+11G4TbTh0QZ4wwPQ AnvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4JQNNrrFh23g11IOeidnPOwxsPb9sweDpYVhSOq9f8H7VCXj6DgwTuwZ42x+sLOuDLuP4aOON4ag6I/ZzQ9/I2/1fYw== X-Received: by 10.28.217.139 with SMTP id q133mr36327820wmg.3.1449673837729; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 07:10:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i18sm8560137wmf.6.2015.12.09.07.10.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Dec 2015 07:10:36 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Mcnamara, John" Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:09:21 +0100 Message-ID: <3756278.RbTW4O93Bj@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1449664541-9546-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] doc: correct Vhost Sample Application guide X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:10:38 -0000 2015-12-09 14:50, Mcnamara, John: > Also, as a general note, not just to this document/patch. > > I don't think the "user@target:~$" prefixes used in some DPDK > Doc commandlines is useful. > > It prevents a straight copy and paste for testing, it makes the > literal block lines longer than they should be, it isn't used > consistently everywhere, it is visually distracting (in some > cases it is longer than the command being shown), and it isn't > always correct (I presume in the above case of "user@target" you > would need run the application as sudo if you are a non root > user). > > Any objections to removing these as documents are updated? Generally speaking, +1 to remove extra bytes :)