From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C267DA034F; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:15:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FE541102; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:15:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A814B40E03 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:15:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBA85C012E; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:15:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:15:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= Zvh1k8KlzOh4qmEdIidiXaV8ozcvdB8adv2SSPx2c+A=; b=sVizDTssW3rxy3FW K8ZqrDne4jOH99ymowsl8NQvV9s48vZjCf0JDAkuPF3SzZeACXUzQ+WzvyX4PQX8 38agnMXISoaL5lqnwcUVPUHYIKjCnfVhqqt3jA9rX96th0y6z8opq5iAcAeO4+F4 6PV0fpoijUNw/ETLcQarR4D30sbmZ8qQkVFaHs8FoKaq4LGH8jTbP4llmPXBHliz WvynMeWAi2CbJgdOumuA96lXjqxBocGx8V2thZzBTVe1cx9YxuKc6wouGLZNSeI/ C8oWLCywHtmw8RpV7pE+cpiqb+cDSLTtFY4Lahyitbr7go99yJftN2oGWI0JdVS0 Fz1oTQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Zvh1k8KlzOh4qmEdIidiXaV8ozcvdB8adv2SSPx2c +A=; b=BKpBNEnTIU8i4WvF0NLLyhGBaSRzqK1ihq2dEUU4B01Em4731GC9PfyZr penT6Kt6Ovggw9hc09IQEsDmon/Zn0GucvwZCfhlCgAijLimFN75uCw6iEWuiCzj +Skg0Hd1VG2cQvUjh6TRvxarrXV8AwWpxIzcvhR/KFIVCj2pmn683EPj+7BIDX8z jQay6F6xxB1nIM2fmhdtucZuEuzYsWXbiXWNX4T8stVwR1YzN9qxZU7dcy7yihEN RMnL+iDjTUwdV0f6azli4MlToEinK+G3XsUsicSRJh/G+Sl24TxSShZGKyJUlazB KNEFm90wQyWupGONjw8cQuLtzjjpQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudeggdekiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthhqredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffleegvdfhheeltedtkeegueekieeifeduvdevveegiedviefhhfdv ffegtdeggfenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgpdhmrghilhdqrghrtghhihhvvg drtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm pehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:15:08 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Lance Richardson Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin , David Marchand , dev , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 17:15:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3764013.fqriFq5c1J@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <2761655.DagZRsOc3m@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Build failures in 21.11-rc2 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/11/2021 17:12, Lance Richardson: > Do the machines used for the CentOS 8 CI builds support AVX512? Probably not. OK thank you. > The failing build is on an Ice Lake server with: > meson -Dmachine=3Dnative build > ninja -C build >=20 > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:08 AM Thomas Monjalon wro= te: > > 09/11/2021 16:57, David Marchand: > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Lance Richardson > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > 21.11-rc2 builds are failing on CentOS 8.4, apparently because > > > > the intrinsic _mm512_set_epi8() is not defined in the GCC > > > > headers (see example below). > > > > > > Thanks for reporting Lance. > > > It rings a bell, think it was mentionned in the past. > > > > CI compilation was passing: > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-November/238534.html > > I would like to better understand. > > > > [...] > > > > Here is a GCC patch to add this intrinsic: > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg188664.html > > > > > > > > BTW, GCC 10.2.1 (via "scl enable gcc-toolset-10") is able to build > > > > 21.11-rc2 successfully on CentOS 8.4. > > > > > > > > Lance > > > > > > > > # gcc --version > > > > gcc (GCC) 8.4.1 20200928 (Red Hat 8.4.1-1) > > [...] > > > > ../lib/hash/rte_thash_x86_gfni.h:59:24: error: implicit declaration= of > > > > function =E2=80=98_mm512_set_epi8=E2=80=99; did you mean =E2=80=98_= mm512_set1_epi8=E2=80=99? > > > > What is different in your setup compared to the CI?