DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Gaëtan Rivet" <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
	"Ferruh Yigit" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: fix vfio mode
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:27:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3786691.UAh344p4j6@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171030091736.GH10890@bidouze.vm.6wind.com>

30/10/2017 10:17, Gaëtan Rivet:
> Hi Ferruh,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 02:00:43AM -0700, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 10/30/2017 1:06 AM, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
> > > Hi Jerin,
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:50:52AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > >> The definition of VFIO_PRESENT is "eal_vfio.h", Fail to
> > >> include eal_vfio.h will result in disabling vfio.
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: 279b581c897d ("vfio: expose functions")
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the fix, sorry for VFIO.
> > > I tried to let go of VFIO_PRESENT in the PCI patchset, unfortunately I did
> > > not do a good-enough job.
> > > 
> > > Instead of reinstating the dependency on the private eal_vfio.h header,
> > > I'd suggest replacing all VFIO_PRESENT references within the PCI bus by
> > > RTE_EAL_VFIO, and make the pci_vfio.c compilation depend on it within
> > > the linux Makefile. Something like:
> > > 
> > > ---8<---
> > > 
> > > grep -rl VFIO_PRESENT drivers/bus/pci/linux/ |while read -r file
> > > do sed -i 's;VFIO_PRESENT;RTE_EAL_VFIO;' $file
> > > done
> > 
> > VFIO_PRESENT is the combination of the if user enabled VFIO and if Linux kernel
> > supports it.
> > 
> > Why not add same check and VFIO_PRESENT definition to rte_vfio.h:
> > 
> >   --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_vfio.h
> >   +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_vfio.h
> >   @@ -34,7 +34,13 @@
> >    #ifndef _RTE_VFIO_H_
> >    #define _RTE_VFIO_H_
> > 
> >   +#if !defined(VFIO_PRESENT) && defined(RTE_EAL_VFIO)
> >   +#include <linux/version.h>
> >   +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 6, 0)
> >    #include <linux/vfio.h>
> >   +#define VFIO_PRESENT
> >   +#endif /* >= 3.6.0 */
> >   +#endif
> >   +
> >   +#ifdef VFIO_PRESENT
> > 
> >   ... Need to wrap here in case VFIO disabled ...
> > 
> >   #endif
> > 
> 
> It would work indeed.
> 
> I mostly dislike having whole compilation units disabled silently on a
> linux version check. I think that if someone wanted to support kernels <
> 3.6, they ought to do the work of disabling RTE_EAL_VFIO.
> 
> A build error could be thrown to help those users toward the right
> solution, but I think that the meaning of having this option enabled
> should be enforced: if it is enabled, it is compiled. If dependencies
> are not met, then the option should be disabled.

+1 to avoid implicit disabling.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-30  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-28  6:20 Jerin Jacob
2017-10-30  8:06 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-10-30  9:00   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30  9:17     ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-10-30  9:27       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-10-30 11:24         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-30 16:57           ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 17:13             ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-10-30  9:10   ` Jerin Jacob
2017-10-30 12:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 12:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] eal: warn user that VFIO is disabled Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 16:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] bus/pci: fix vfio mode Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 16:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal: warn user that VFIO is disabled Gaetan Rivet
2017-10-30 17:31       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 17:26     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] bus/pci: fix vfio mode Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 19:07       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-30 22:32     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-31 12:03       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-10-31 16:58         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-31 18:21         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-31 14:11       ` Gaëtan Rivet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3786691.UAh344p4j6@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).