From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id A904DA045E
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 May 2019 20:09:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7981B955;
	Thu, 30 May 2019 20:09:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9ED91B954
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 May 2019 20:09:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51])
 by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 30 May 2019 11:09:27 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203])
 by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2019 11:09:27 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx152.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.5) by
 FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 30 May 2019 11:09:27 -0700
Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.170]) by
 FMSMSX152.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.59]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000;
 Thu, 30 May 2019 11:09:27 -0700
From: "Walker, Benjamin" <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
CC: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] eal/pci: Inline several functions
 into rte_pci_get_iommu_class
Thread-Index: AQHVFw/o1u7DQ4w4CkGO0en51eaR/KaEaWMA//+NtvA=
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 18:09:26 +0000
Message-ID: <37B08312E007AE46A00101F43DA919DDF3E8D302@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <20190530174819.1160221-1-benjamin.walker@intel.com>
 <20190530174819.1160221-3-benjamin.walker@intel.com>
 <20190530105702.4fce8a6d@hermes.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20190530105702.4fce8a6d@hermes.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNWQxYWUwZDItMWFhYi00MzJiLTlhNTMtMjY2NWMwYTE1ZTg0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoibU9zSlBGTkV1NVlGQldvdWg1bkt4NmZhbzBoUnFoSVRHSUorb3ArcVRaelwvc0ZQN3I0aXhaMmZSWnFndHlSd0EifQ==
x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.600.7
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.106]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] eal/pci: Inline several functions into
 rte_pci_get_iommu_class
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:57 AM
> To: Walker, Benjamin <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] eal/pci: Inline several functions i=
nto
> rte_pci_get_iommu_class
>=20
> On Thu, 30 May 2019 10:48:09 -0700
> Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com> wrote:
>=20
> > This is in preparation for future simplifications. The functions are
> > simply inlined for now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
> > Change-Id: I129992c9b44f4575a28cc05b78297e15b6be4249
>=20
> Please don't inline any functions that are not in the fast path.
> The compiler will do it anyway.

That's not what I mean by inline. I didn't mark the functions inline - I co=
pied
their contents into the single place they are called. This patch is a set u=
p patch
for a later one that refactors the way this function works, and doing this =
makes
the diff easier to read.