From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.212.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01654C6E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:38:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d1so833334wiv.15
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=4VueheHHYxVY9mhkNFmgktv7eDQbnejfLz6O1fRlUb0=;
 b=O110qSXEv7pCJINxIRjrVf2wCmafD6Vp6wkpsnSSTq0NnQSKN9UZA0o7oSHbL+yN0q
 JfTy2odaCiWrBsOXMi7w0fMb6VM1P0mKMGBkrYtpPyNCk6HBHT5+urTDt6mTZcaylFpb
 FyaE3+3HWKpcxM1TY78/+8ksxY+KALxuOJ5ONn78h/Uu/BNVDyq4v8z9ltW3EDcfdPZj
 VXABU2J4s3l9i+uLi2JHcLwFWjoblHqDv3ISg1WOJ4V8PiOz9bLfXwLlV0kcYzAU2x++
 tW5pXA6Q8hcqJ7NKivMUcY5SZSdZ7NOMK3FL6lb0ijz1OyhNk1ArrJXPxMQ/V0IikoPe
 xabw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/o1kic44i19+Fuu25uQ8OK2ioN6Y3eYbKa+JgMpdDaevtRG+o8vFuEksCGVOZybWaj8lK
X-Received: by 10.195.13.234 with SMTP id fb10mr8110701wjd.50.1395326405458;
 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm53512423wiy.9.2014.03.20.07.40.03
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:40:02 +0100
Message-ID: <3865777.5pN4eNKWaY@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.12.3 (Linux/3.13.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1393575696-25289-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
References: <1393575696-25289-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: fix use of RTE_PTR_ALIGN_CEIL macro
	on 32bits system
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:38:34 -0000

28/02/2014 09:21, David Marchand :
> RTE_PTR_ALIGN_CEIL return type is the same as what we give it as input.
> So instead of casting the returned value, cast 'addr' which should be the
> same as base_virtaddr.
> 
> Reported-by: Mats Liljegren <mats.liljegren@enea.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>

Acked and applied with title
"mem: fix build of virtual address hinting for 32-bit"

Thank you
-- 
Thomas