From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4437B1B786 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:37:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C14208C0; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:37:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:37:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=J0cA3qGOplr5xihkXg61OGBhL7 O1TwrOi5cj7uLPcI0=; b=kdnkgjCboVaJ9tjk2ZO4mqa2hOJ+MdGf4gPwZDWACa FTt2n28jIXdhk//cbpH4j+ZQFISlLdhqQbMlARmSnHNv6pvJ8pocyZsm6FYlgWeO l3M1u2mwYnfiYCuWfI6+xo68Fm5AUnX+8zcNegyKJL4Yz185fL30J8y5hV9fcDaW o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=J0cA3q GOplr5xihkXg61OGBhL7O1TwrOi5cj7uLPcI0=; b=S4kAJjW+UvJyUUudWQV5yi HN8FFAIEiyHMpoL7zEnm033Fp1jTLiTRj+5oT4ZD8B10rDOwkdQFdPy4QC0Xkl79 fRmDN4Z/Ims4Hp81QKbUw+5RxW+8Rkt+mgGDccOxZ0SH0hxsJo5F+xaO8/KffdER zRn1hsR7H2cWO5rDivvecME70ScomBs2TXd74sTY5TK7wwFFW8j37FN4PjRNZuC8 t1GD6DCoPYawz9Qyy5zY6qRapcIZevbR3/xADhkUasPeS3xk9//NiLiYaV+0HEez F2i5wY3lWnxpV16liYWvQI8SkkyGdCUPTb8Y3J03za/zChgOzy5A1xogl/H6zjwA == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 72F88240B6; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:37:13 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Neil Horman Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:36:27 +0100 Message-ID: <3928760.9ZWfWQzQIi@xps> In-Reply-To: <20180131121836.GA23692@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> References: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <9925007.qJ5tT5KyCr@xps> <20180131121836.GA23692@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:37:14 -0000 31/01/2018 13:18, Neil Horman: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman: > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman: > > > > > v5 Changes > > > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas > > > > > > > > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5. > > > > Rebased and applied, thanks. > > > > > > > Sorry, not clear what you mean by this. Are you saying that there were several > > > new experimental API's added recently that my initial set of tags missed? If > > > so, thanks for doing that. I will also be sending another patch set soon, to > > > reconcile API's that are documented as experimental but not listed in the > > > version map as such > > > > I meant that I have applied a lot of new experimental functions > > after you sent the v5. > > So I had to add the tag and CFLAGS for these new functions. > > Usual rebase work. > > > Understood, thank you. > > > About reconciling experimental functions and map, > > we should also consider upgrading some functions to non-experimental. > > > I figured if I were to just do a reconcilliation of everything that is currently > documented as experimental, that would be the impetus for their authors to yell > at me about their not actually being experimental anymore, and I could fix that > up in subsequent versions :) OK, sounds like a plan.