From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4437B1B786
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:37:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C14208C0;
 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:37:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:37:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=J0cA3qGOplr5xihkXg61OGBhL7
 O1TwrOi5cj7uLPcI0=; b=kdnkgjCboVaJ9tjk2ZO4mqa2hOJ+MdGf4gPwZDWACa
 FTt2n28jIXdhk//cbpH4j+ZQFISlLdhqQbMlARmSnHNv6pvJ8pocyZsm6FYlgWeO
 l3M1u2mwYnfiYCuWfI6+xo68Fm5AUnX+8zcNegyKJL4Yz185fL30J8y5hV9fcDaW
 o=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=J0cA3q
 GOplr5xihkXg61OGBhL7O1TwrOi5cj7uLPcI0=; b=S4kAJjW+UvJyUUudWQV5yi
 HN8FFAIEiyHMpoL7zEnm033Fp1jTLiTRj+5oT4ZD8B10rDOwkdQFdPy4QC0Xkl79
 fRmDN4Z/Ims4Hp81QKbUw+5RxW+8Rkt+mgGDccOxZ0SH0hxsJo5F+xaO8/KffdER
 zRn1hsR7H2cWO5rDivvecME70ScomBs2TXd74sTY5TK7wwFFW8j37FN4PjRNZuC8
 t1GD6DCoPYawz9Qyy5zY6qRapcIZevbR3/xADhkUasPeS3xk9//NiLiYaV+0HEez
 F2i5wY3lWnxpV16liYWvQI8SkkyGdCUPTb8Y3J03za/zChgOzy5A1xogl/H6zjwA
 ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ebhxWtR3srogjFlfyxXszsGszKknMYexBXN08JEk8sCZOXhL59M62w>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 72F88240B6;
 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:37:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:36:27 +0100
Message-ID: <3928760.9ZWfWQzQIi@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20180131121836.GA23692@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
References: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
 <9925007.qJ5tT5KyCr@xps>
 <20180131121836.GA23692@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:37:14 -0000

31/01/2018 13:18, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman:
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> > > > > v5 Changes
> > > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas
> > > > 
> > > > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5.
> > > > Rebased and applied, thanks.
> > > > 
> > > Sorry, not clear what you mean by this.   Are you saying that there were several
> > > new experimental API's added recently that my initial set of tags missed?  If
> > > so, thanks for doing that.  I will also be sending another patch set soon, to
> > > reconcile API's that are documented as experimental but not listed in the
> > > version map as such
> > 
> > I meant that I have applied a lot of new experimental functions
> > after you sent the v5.
> > So I had to add the tag and CFLAGS for these new functions.
> > Usual rebase work.
> > 
> Understood, thank you.
> 
> > About reconciling experimental functions and map,
> > we should also consider upgrading some functions to non-experimental.
> > 
> I figured if I were to just do a reconcilliation of everything that is currently
> documented as experimental, that would be the impetus for their authors to yell
> at me about their not actually being experimental anymore, and I could fix that
> up in subsequent versions :)

OK, sounds like a plan.