From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2106BA034F; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:39:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA388410F5; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73491410DA; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19BGBu3o023367; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:39:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=SfX/2q3j9e2nW9137pcfq9bQ7ClluyXQH0n7Gu/0/6w=; b=CidxVFRsEN6f0O92xCtjVz9Q/AxFZVwGfmUuHWDRS/I+OfEFlI87gKkZ1137TNwXwEq+ hy68ZCM+KSOx9zBrFtaIVxmgnLtpo3IsFJA1PWgnGEXXBfrKPixyuamrTVemuA6X3SNL fbg2lGrEtKSDUsphGDp1qYrSysQu2+wc3nJBbMyj0Y2h6aLa6rA1D3/zu9f0156qbmXy tQ800eYZvbQZ3ZkFMialPQcah6nEqyw3XVxd04r/a11TOd/uG2SER+RKSMRX48MnIE55 8OMcg1UntHN4OaoFYlLydYh8UQPg4LHIY2ql5MVaGUfaXaieV7/9Bx5vrlDuO/X4C+BU UQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bmrju8k24-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:39:16 -0400 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 19BGBxxl023439; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:39:16 -0400 Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bmrju8k1r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:39:16 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 19BGVF2u031734; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:39:15 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bk2qa0y43-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:39:15 +0000 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 19BGdElj28967240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:39:14 GMT Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7137478063; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582DB78060; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:39:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.65.202.132] (unknown [9.65.202.132]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:39:13 +0000 (GMT) To: Lincoln Lavoie Cc: "Zhang, Qi Z" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , dev , "Yang, Qiming" , "ci@dpdk.org" , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , "Singh, Aman Deep" , David Marchand References: <7c1ead6b-6e3a-ad0b-ea80-25dd266db87e@intel.com> <496be70d3a6343a8be1306df53d67e23@intel.com> From: Thinh Tran Message-ID: <3966d240-433c-5398-f49b-aecacd1387ef@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:39:14 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: tmQV-ApkVI_fSD-aRpLnu4cNJ2xBD-Ts X-Proofpoint-GUID: 8StNNbSgTZuVDhGfrv6rd4KLpd5kaqGU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-11_05,2021-10-11_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110110097 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RHEL7 failures X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Linconln, I have this patch set 100042 - build/ppc: enable build support for Power10 https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/100042 Thanks, Thinh Tran On 10/11/2021 9:42 AM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > Hi Thinh, The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures after a > patch was applied.  This is a corner case, where a bad change was merged > and affected all patches downstream of that merge.  We can retrigger > specific patches, just ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart > This Message Is From an External Sender > This message came from outside your organization. > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > Hi Thinh, > > The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures after a patch was > applied.  This is a corner case, where a bad change was merged and > affected all patches downstream of that merge.  We can retrigger > specific patches, just let us know the patch number or the URI of the > patch(es). > > Cheers, > Lincoln > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:39 AM Thinh Tran > wrote: > > > Hi, > I'm wondering how or when the CI would re-pick up the patches those > were > failed due to this issue? > > Regards, > Thinh Tran > > On 10/6/2021 10:40 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > > Hi Ferruh, David and Aman: > > > >       Sorry for late response due to PRC holiday. > >       I have just tested the patch and there is no issue be > detected for functions > >       Thank you so much for the help! > > > > Regards > > Qi > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Yigit, Ferruh > > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:46 AM > >> To: Lincoln Lavoie >; dev >; Yang, Qiming > >> >; Zhang, > Qi Z > > >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org ; Aaron Conole > >; dpdklab > >> >; Singh, Aman > Deep >; > >> David Marchand > > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RHEL7 failures > >> > >> On 10/5/2021 8:09 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > >>> Hello Qiming and Qi, > >>> > >>> The CI is picking up failures when building on RHEL7, where > warnings > >>> are being treated as errors.  This looks like something has been > >>> merged into the mainline, as it's failing across all patches. > >>> > >>> Here is the specific failure: > >>> > >>> ./drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function '_hv_bit_sel': > >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:201:2: error: dereferencing > >>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > >>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing] > >>>     d64 = *(u64 *)&b[0]; > >>>     ^ > >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function > '_reg_bit_sel': > >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:458:2: error: dereferencing > >>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > >>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing] > >>>     d32 = *(u32 *)&v[0]; > >>>     ^ > >>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > >>> > >>> You can download a full set of logs from here (for a failing run): > >>> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19162/ > > >>> > >> > >> Issue was reported by David, Aman sent the fix [1] and it is > already merged by > >> David [2], it should be fixed now, can you please double check? > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman > > >> .deep.singh@intel.com/ > >> > >> [2] > >> > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809 > > >> 021b154 > > > > -- > *Lincoln Lavoie* > Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies > 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 > lylavoie@iol.unh.edu > https://www.iol.unh.edu > +1-603-674-2755 (m) >