From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <paras.kumar@inventum.net>
Received: from smtp145.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp145.dfw.emailsrvr.com
 [67.192.241.145]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D31E10DDE
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:07:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp27.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp27.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7DE5DA00B7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:07:30 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: catchall@inventum.net
Received: by smtp27.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:
 catchall-AT-inventum.net) with ESMTPSA id EDFABA00EA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:07:29 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: catchall@inventum.net
Received: from mxdel.inventum.net ([UNAVAILABLE]. [103.25.205.2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384)
 by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:07:30 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mxdel.inventum.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4081D36E001
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:37:26 +0530 (IST)
Received: from mxdel.inventum.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mxdel.inventum.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
 with ESMTP id e7iqRF6n_Ph0 for <dev@dpdk.org>;
 Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:37:25 +0530 (IST)
Received: from mxdel.inventum.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mxdel.inventum.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A447936E002
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:37:25 +0530 (IST)
Received: from [172.16.4.3] (nasdel.inventum.in [172.16.0.202])
 by mxdel.inventum.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AD8036E001
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:37:25 +0530 (IST)
To: dev@dpdk.org
References: <f6730b2f-0bab-6722-b9a1-e653354d9bcc@elyzion.net>
From: Paras Kumar <paras.kumar@inventum.net>
Message-ID: <39863674-6243-1b71-96ae-460d3ecb4a75@inventum.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:07:25 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f6730b2f-0bab-6722-b9a1-e653354d9bcc@elyzion.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] lpm6: speed improvement on delete rule
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 06:07:31 -0000

Hi,
  I have used this lpm6 speed improvement patch for BGPv6 by *Nikita 
Kozlov*. it works great for fixed prefix length however, when i use 
variable prefix length for routes after 2 iterations of addition and 
deletion of routes (30000 approx) lpm6 crashes in expand_rule due to 
stack overflow. The ext bit in rte_lpm6_tbl_entry comes out to be 1 
every time.

Regards
Paras