From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A24C58D8 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:10:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id w84so237527516wmg.1 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 01:10:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uSBOlNtCJAXHeIySpOmOCqLeb8jyLdRfxKu1epvAK34=; b=koa0PlzKxaCPMd7Er/gLsG617h2Qr63bCwh4czEGVcrRVsH2MYtuCjl8PmidLqd8YU LYAGxwEBY7xd0P3KQHUTv9UAdLD7QgEa46WzOmnLulhgiXPgGZjdx2oAzDzTyxb9DZSm zbmDK6PIAT3kiCtlwOXVKR3yR9gViCmoDuJBwYpBXe4ZVNktlDd1JeR8NHRd+vqsiaJf n2Pik6OmgZ5Qt+iEvgIPQQUe+wrRzlJvsKw52cX/IgUuDnHhX4UFJDaPtRoDuxmxZs4k f9htrYvluxghDYj4YZkP0X7UNScUb484vWX1+EI7c9Cyj8ebJlb7gvCti5hMxuDp5faN r9Zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uSBOlNtCJAXHeIySpOmOCqLeb8jyLdRfxKu1epvAK34=; b=PSwyfL2U0H3EQfAmDWKSJZ2juaA9xrq2fd7vi7ydZH0OZ3qHhm3o0o6Sb0iwLtXMc0 MdBKsEJE4w07xxl7JxIEU/AXxZPPaMSr6g73i5L7vRX2HBBJPU/lB+wrFCYRYYENTE3F RPt+bwrPxnTvYLFXyYzeULPZ+fNXHx1dWKqQMAWqI6EBf4HAdnvp6F6OeGvc8CM6szp3 V/KWY5wz7kdI0cGULJCGrpZ1OK2HoUdZsjmnqdi5ZT3esnDykGgdVxmRuuZUNbX1pPEt G93vimQvguw2fLy6vDV0Jf9tDIC4gbk0bo1pmpKmBn4UlOB25vcgEWqQJo6KQtHylOKm aBnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rk5HXXiTQnKJ+ilPzsQQSQUbOMlT3cnlJKya5xVDWhVoNJ9vc3RZwwTMNoOJJyi3kTx X-Received: by 10.28.217.136 with SMTP id q130mr1200764wmg.131.1474531842174; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 01:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm790149wje.14.2016.09.22.01.10.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 01:10:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Liu, Yong" Cc: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , Stephen Finucane , dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:10:39 +0200 Message-ID: <3989145.seKIcVLuET@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E602DDBC0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1736050.3Z5tnqk6B6@xps13> <9398822.xtO6cvAGR1@xps13> <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E602DDBC0@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:10:42 -0000 2016-09-22 06:34, Liu, Yong: > Thomas, > There's another new column "S/W/F" added in latest patchwork. This column is represent for validation status "success/warning/failure". > At last the status will be stored into patchwork_check database and used for continuous integration. > Below is just one sample for check infor. Do you have any plan to implement it in dpdk validation process? Yes, that's the plan: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/046282.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-July/022132.html