From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8B82934
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:38:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2016 06:38:57 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,482,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="18895501"
Received: from irsmsx154.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.96])
 by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2016 06:38:55 -0700
Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.6]) by
 IRSMSX154.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:38:54 +0100
From: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
CC: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mk: gcc -march support for intel
 processors code names
Thread-Index: AQHSIz3t+p9fzVi5TUOR/ad051OhOKCksoMAgAAhlkA=
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:38:53 +0000
Message-ID: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F010AE5D3@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1471875574-29807-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com>
 <1476135193-4721-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com>
 <2355225.oGVz1zBJsg@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <2355225.oGVz1zBJsg@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiOTcyMWNlMzItNjRhOC00ZTAxLTkyNzYtYzZlMjhkNjA1ZjRmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Im1SSmRnVlhSR0dIbE1WekZzb0JWTlBkRkxwVEhqMGFmc0NKUkJiYlZhcm89In0=
x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mk: gcc -march support for intel
 processors code names
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:38:58 -0000

Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 1:34 PM
> To: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mk: gcc -march support for intel proce=
ssors
> code names
>=20
> 2016-10-10 22:33, Reshma Pattan:
> > The GCC 4.9 -march option supports the intel code names for
> > processors, for example -march=3Dsilvermont, -march=3Dbroadwell.
> > The RTE_MACHINE config flag can be used to pass code name to the
> > compiler as -march flag.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
>=20
> Applied, thanks
>=20
> How the -march=3Dbroadwell option will work with icc and clang?

Clang does support broadwell option.
And I do have Icc version" icc (ICC) 16.0.3 20160415" which doesn't support=
 code names.

Any other info you are explicitly looking for?

Thanks,
Reshma