DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Di, ChenxuX" <chenxux.di@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: cleanup Tx buffers
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 09:01:13 +0000
Message-ID: <3B926E44943CB04AA3A39AC16328CE39B9262D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB2558D21A9E6008741FE793079A270@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 8:54 PM
> To: Di, ChenxuX <chenxux.di@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Di, ChenxuX
> <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: cleanup Tx buffers
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Add support to the ixgbe driver for the API rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup to
> > force free consumed buffers on Tx ring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chenxu Di <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c |   2 +
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c   | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h   |   2 +
> >  3 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > index 2c6fd0f13..0091405db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > @@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbe_eth_dev_ops
> > = {  .udp_tunnel_port_add  = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_add,
> > .udp_tunnel_port_del  = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_del,
> >  .tm_ops_get           = ixgbe_tm_ops_get,
> > +.tx_done_cleanup      = ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup,
> 
> Don't see how we can have one tx_done_cleanup() for different tx functions?
> Vector and scalar TX path use different  format for sw_ring[] entries.
> Also offload and simile TX paths use different method to track used/free
> descriptors, and use different functions to free them:
> offload uses tx_entry next_id, last_id plus txq. last_desc_cleaned, while simple
> TX paths use tx_next_dd.
> 

This patches will be not include function for Vector, and I will update my code to
Make it work for offload and simple .
> 
> >  };
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -649,6 +650,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbevf_eth_dev_ops
> = {
> >  .reta_query           = ixgbe_dev_rss_reta_query,
> >  .rss_hash_update      = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_update,
> >  .rss_hash_conf_get    = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_conf_get,
> > +.tx_done_cleanup      = ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup,
> >  };
> >
> >  /* store statistics names and its offset in stats structure */ diff
> > --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index fa572d184..520b9c756 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -2306,6 +2306,122 @@ ixgbe_tx_queue_release_mbufs(struct
> > ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)  }  }
> >
> > +int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup(void *q, uint32_t free_cnt)
> 
> That seems to work only for offload(full) TX path (ixgbe_xmit_pkts).
> Simple(fast) path seems not covered by this function.
> 

Same as above

> > +{
> > +struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq = (struct ixgbe_tx_queue *)q; struct
> > +ixgbe_tx_entry *sw_ring; volatile union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *txr;
> > +uint16_t tx_first; /* First segment analyzed. */
> > +uint16_t tx_id;    /* Current segment being processed. */
> > +uint16_t tx_last;  /* Last segment in the current packet. */ uint16_t
> > +tx_next;  /* First segment of the next packet. */ int count;
> > +
> > +if (txq == NULL)
> > +return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +count = 0;
> > +sw_ring = txq->sw_ring;
> > +txr = txq->tx_ring;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * tx_tail is the last sent packet on the sw_ring. Goto the end
> > + * of that packet (the last segment in the packet chain) and
> > + * then the next segment will be the start of the oldest segment
> > + * in the sw_ring.
> 
> Not sure I understand the sentence above.
> tx_tail is the value of TDT HW register (most recently armed by SW TD).
> last_id  is the index of last descriptor for multi-seg packet.
> next_id is just the index of next descriptor in HW TD ring.
> How do you conclude that it will be the ' oldest segment in the sw_ring'?
> 

The tx_tail is the last sent packet on the sw_ring. While the xmit_cleanup or 
Tx_free_bufs will be call when the nb_tx_free < tx_free_thresh .
So the sw_ring[tx_tail].next_id must be the begin of mbufs which are not used or
 Already freed . then begin the loop until the mbuf is used and begin to free them.



> Another question why do you need to write your own functions?
> Why can't you reuse existing ixgbe_xmit_cleanup() for full(offload) path and
> ixgbe_tx_free_bufs() for simple path?
> Yes,  ixgbe_xmit_cleanup() doesn't free mbufs, but at least it could be used to
> determine finished TX descriptors.
> Based on that you can you can free appropriate sw_ring[] entries.
> 

The reason why I don't reuse existing function is that they all free several mbufs 
While the free_cnt of the API rte_eth_tx_done_cleanup() is the number of packets.
It also need to be done that check which mbuffs are from the same packet.


> >This is the first packet that will be
> > + * attempted to be freed.
> > + */
> > +
> > +/* Get last segment in most recently added packet. */ tx_last =
> > +sw_ring[txq->tx_tail].last_id;
> > +
> > +/* Get the next segment, which is the oldest segment in ring. */
> > +tx_first = sw_ring[tx_last].next_id;
> > +
> > +/* Set the current index to the first. */ tx_id = tx_first;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Loop through each packet. For each packet, verify that an
> > + * mbuf exists and that the last segment is free. If so, free
> > + * it and move on.
> > + */
> > +while (1) {
> > +tx_last = sw_ring[tx_id].last_id;
> > +
> > +if (sw_ring[tx_last].mbuf) {
> > +if (!(txr[tx_last].wb.status &
> > +IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD))
> > +break;
> > +
> > +/* Get the start of the next packet. */ tx_next =
> > +sw_ring[tx_last].next_id;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Loop through all segments in a
> > + * packet.
> > + */
> > +do {
> > +rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf);
> > +sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf = NULL;
> > +sw_ring[tx_id].last_id = tx_id;
> > +
> > +/* Move to next segment. */
> > +tx_id = sw_ring[tx_id].next_id;
> > +
> > +} while (tx_id != tx_next);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Increment the number of packets
> > + * freed.
> > + */
> > +count++;
> > +
> > +if (unlikely(count == (int)free_cnt)) break; } else {
> > +/*
> > + * There are multiple reasons to be here:
> > + * 1) All the packets on the ring have been
> > + *    freed - tx_id is equal to tx_first
> > + *    and some packets have been freed.
> > + *    - Done, exit
> > + * 2) Interfaces has not sent a rings worth of
> > + *    packets yet, so the segment after tail is
> > + *    still empty. Or a previous call to this
> > + *    function freed some of the segments but
> > + *    not all so there is a hole in the list.
> > + *    Hopefully this is a rare case.
> > + *    - Walk the list and find the next mbuf. If
> > + *      there isn't one, then done.
> > + */
> > +if (likely(tx_id == tx_first && count != 0)) break;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Walk the list and find the next mbuf, if any.
> > + */
> > +do {
> > +/* Move to next segment. */
> > +tx_id = sw_ring[tx_id].next_id;
> > +
> > +if (sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf)
> > +break;
> > +
> > +} while (tx_id != tx_first);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Determine why previous loop bailed. If there
> > + * is not an mbuf, done.
> > + */
> > +if (sw_ring[tx_id].mbuf == NULL)
> > +break;
> > +}
> > +}
> > +
> > +return count;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void __attribute__((cold))
> >  ixgbe_tx_free_swring(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)  { diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > index 505d344b9..2c3770af6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ int ixgbe_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev);  int ixgbe_rxq_vec_setup(struct ixgbe_rx_queue
> > *rxq);  void ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue
> > *rxq);
> >
> > +int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup(void *txq, uint32_t free_cnt);
> > +
> >  extern const uint32_t ptype_table[IXGBE_PACKET_TYPE_MAX];
> >  extern const uint32_t ptype_table_tn[IXGBE_PACKET_TYPE_TN_MAX];
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> 


  reply index

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03  5:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03  5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20  3:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-26  8:24     ` Xing, Beilei
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24  2:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 13:01     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 12:53     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-03  9:01       ` Di, ChenxuX [this message]
2020-01-05 23:36         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-06  9:03           ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-06 13:26             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-07 10:46               ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-07 14:09                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-08 10:15                   ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-08 15:12                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30  9:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 14:01     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10 10:08       ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-10 12:46         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-09 10:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10  9:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 13:49     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10  9:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13  9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-14  1:55     ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-14 12:40     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-15 14:34       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16  1:40         ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-16  7:09           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: cleanup for vec path check Xiaolong Ye
2020-01-16 10:19             ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-17  2:21             ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-16  8:43     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: cleanup Tx buffers Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:07     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-16  8:44     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 14:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 15:23       ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13  9:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-14  2:49     ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-01-14  2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B926E44943CB04AA3A39AC16328CE39B9262D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=chenxux.di@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox