From: "Di, ChenxuX" <chenxux.di@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: cleanup Tx buffers
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:08:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B926E44943CB04AA3A39AC16328CE39B95155@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB2558AF818E543328E5F48C249A390@SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
hi, Konstantin
thanks for your opinion, I have fixed almost in new version patch except one.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 10:02 PM
> To: Di, ChenxuX <chenxux.di@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Di, ChenxuX
> <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: cleanup Tx buffers
>
>
> Hi Chenxu,
>
> Good progress wih _full_version, but still some issues remains I think.
> More comments inline.
> Konstantin
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chenxu Di <chenxux.di@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 4 +
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h | 10 ++
> > 3 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > index 2c6fd0f13..668c36188 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > @@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbe_eth_dev_ops
> > = { .udp_tunnel_port_add = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_add,
> > .udp_tunnel_port_del = ixgbe_dev_udp_tunnel_port_del,
> > .tm_ops_get = ixgbe_tm_ops_get,
> > +.tx_done_cleanup = ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup,
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -649,6 +650,7 @@ static const struct eth_dev_ops ixgbevf_eth_dev_ops
> = {
> > .reta_query = ixgbe_dev_rss_reta_query,
> > .rss_hash_update = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_update,
> > .rss_hash_conf_get = ixgbe_dev_rss_hash_conf_get,
> > +.tx_done_cleanup = ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup,
> > };
> >
> > /* store statistics names and its offset in stats structure */ @@
> > -1101,6 +1103,7 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
> > void *init_params __rte_unused) eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst =
> > &ixgbe_recv_pkts; eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = &ixgbe_xmit_pkts;
> > eth_dev->tx_pkt_prepare = &ixgbe_prep_pkts;
> > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar);
> >
> > /*
> > * For secondary processes, we don't initialise any further as
> > primary @@ -1580,6 +1583,7 @@ eth_ixgbevf_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *eth_dev) eth_dev->dev_ops = &ixgbevf_eth_dev_ops;
> > eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = &ixgbe_recv_pkts; eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > &ixgbe_xmit_pkts;
> > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar);
> >
> > /* for secondary processes, we don't initialise any further as primary
> > * has already done this work. Only check we don't need a different
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index fa572d184..122dae425 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ uint16_t ixgbe_xmit_fixed_burst_vec(void *tx_queue,
> struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> > uint16_t nb_pkts);
> > #endif
> >
> > +static ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_op;
>
> You can't have just one static variable here.
> There could be several ixgbe devices and they could be configured in a different
> way.
> I.E. txpkt_burst() is per device, so tx_done_cleanup() also has to be per device.
> Probably the easiest way is to add new entry for tx_done_cleanup into struct
> ixgbe_txq_ops, and set it properly in ixgbe_set_tx_function().
>
> > +
> >
> /****************************************************************
> *****
> > *
> > * TX functions
> > @@ -2306,6 +2308,152 @@ ixgbe_tx_queue_release_mbufs(struct
> > ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) } }
> >
> > +int
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t
> > +free_cnt)
>
> As a nit I would change _scalar to _full or so.
>
> > +{
> > +uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> > +uint16_t i;
> > +uint16_t tx_last;
> > +uint16_t tx_id;
> > +uint16_t nb_tx_to_clean;
> > +uint16_t nb_tx_free_last;
> > +struct ixgbe_tx_entry *swr_ring = txq->sw_ring;
> > +
> > +/* Start free mbuf from the next of tx_tail */ tx_last =
> > +txq->tx_tail; tx_id = swr_ring[tx_last].next_id;
> > +
> > +if (txq->nb_tx_free == 0)
> > +if (ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
>
>
> As a nit it could be just if (ixgbe_set_tx_function && ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
>
> > +return 0;
> > +
> > +nb_tx_to_clean = txq->nb_tx_free;
> > +nb_tx_free_last = txq->nb_tx_free;
> > +if (!free_cnt)
> > +free_cnt = txq->nb_tx_desc;
> > +
> > +/* Loop through swr_ring to count the amount of
> > + * freeable mubfs and packets.
> > + */
> > +for (pkt_cnt = 0; pkt_cnt < free_cnt; ) { for (i = 0; i <
> > +nb_tx_to_clean && pkt_cnt < free_cnt && tx_id != tx_last; i++) { if
> > +(swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf != NULL) {
> > +rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf);
> > +swr_ring[tx_id].mbuf = NULL;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * last segment in the packet,
> > + * increment packet count
> > + */
> > +pkt_cnt += (swr_ring[tx_id].last_id == tx_id); }
> > +
> > +tx_id = swr_ring[tx_id].next_id;
> > +}
> > +
> > +if (tx_id == tx_last || txq->tx_rs_thresh
> > +> txq->nb_tx_desc - txq->nb_tx_free)
>
> First condition (tx_id == tx_last) is porbably redundant here.
>
I think it is necessary. The txq may transmit packets when the API called.
So txq->nb_tx_free may be changed.
If (tx_id == tx_last) , it will break the loop above and the function should be done and return.
However if more than txq->tx_rs_thresh numbers packet send into txq while function doing.
It will not return. And fall in endless loop
> > +break;
> > +
> > +if (pkt_cnt < free_cnt) {
> > +if (ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(txq))
> > +break;
> > +
> > +nb_tx_to_clean = txq->nb_tx_free - nb_tx_free_last; nb_tx_free_last =
> > +txq->nb_tx_free; } }
> > +
> > +PMD_TX_FREE_LOG(DEBUG,
> > +"Free %u Packets successfully "
> > +"(port=%d queue=%d)",
> > +pkt_cnt, txq->port_id, txq->queue_id);
> > +
> > +return (int)pkt_cnt;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq __rte_unused,
> > +uint32_t free_cnt __rte_unused) { return -ENOTSUP; }
> > +
> > +int
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t
> > +free_cnt) { uint16_t i; uint16_t tx_first; uint16_t tx_id; uint32_t
> > +pkt_cnt; struct ixgbe_tx_entry *swr_ring = txq->sw_ring;
>
>
> Looks overcomplicated here.
> TX simple (and vec) doesn't support mulsti-seg packets, So one TXD - one mbuf,
> and one packet.
> And ixgbe_tx_free_bufs() always retunrs/frees either 0 or tx_rs_thresh
> mbufs/packets.
> So it probably can be something like that:
>
> ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t free_cnt) {
> If (free_cnt == 0)
> free_cnt = txq->nb_desc;
>
> cnt = free_cnt - free_cnt % txq->tx_rs_thesh;
> for (i = 0; i < cnt; i+= n) {
> n = ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(txq);
> if (n == 0)
> break;
> }
> return i;
> }
>
> > +
> > +/* Start free mbuf from tx_first */
> > +tx_first = txq->tx_next_dd - (txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1); tx_id =
> > +tx_first;
> > +
> > +/* while free_cnt is 0,
> > + * suppose one mbuf per packet,
> > + * try to free packets as many as possible */ if (free_cnt == 0)
> > +free_cnt = txq->nb_tx_desc;
> > +
> > +/* Loop through swr_ring to count freeable packets */ for (pkt_cnt =
> > +0; pkt_cnt < free_cnt; ) { if (txq->nb_tx_desc - txq->nb_tx_free <
> > +txq->tx_rs_thresh) break;
> > +
> > +if (!ixgbe_tx_free_bufs(txq))
> > +break;
> > +
> > +for (i = 0; i != txq->tx_rs_thresh && tx_id != tx_first; i++) {
> > +/* last segment in the packet,
> > + * increment packet count
> > + */
> > +pkt_cnt += (tx_id == swr_ring[tx_id].last_id); tx_id =
> > +swr_ring[tx_id].next_id; }
> > +
> > +if (tx_id == tx_first)
> > +break;
> > +}
> > +
> > +PMD_TX_FREE_LOG(DEBUG,
> > +"Free %u packets successfully "
> > +"(port=%d queue=%d)",
> > +pkt_cnt, txq->port_id, txq->queue_id);
> > +
> > +return (int)pkt_cnt;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup(void *txq, uint32_t free_cnt) {
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t func = ixgbe_get_tx_done_cleanup_func();
> > +
> > +if (!func)
> > +return -ENOTSUP;
> > +
> > +return func(txq, free_cnt);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void
> > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t fn) {
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_op = fn; }
> > +
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t
> > +ixgbe_get_tx_done_cleanup_func(void)
> > +{
> > +return ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_op;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __attribute__((cold))
> > ixgbe_tx_free_swring(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) { @@ -2398,9
> > +2546,14 @@ ixgbe_set_tx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct
> > ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> > ixgbe_txq_vec_setup(txq) == 0)) {
> > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Vector tx enabled."); dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec; -} else
> > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec);
> > +} else {
> > #endif
> > dev->tx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_xmit_pkts_simple;
> > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple);
> > +#ifdef RTE_IXGBE_INC_VECTOR
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > } else {
> > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Using full-featured tx code path");
> > PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, @@ -2412,6 +2565,7 @@
> ixgbe_set_tx_function(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev, struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq) (unsigned
> > long)RTE_PMD_IXGBE_TX_MAX_BURST); dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> > ixgbe_xmit_pkts; dev->tx_pkt_prepare = ixgbe_prep_pkts;
> > +ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h index 505d344b9..a52597aa9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ struct ixgbe_txq_ops {
> > IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_DEXT |\
> > IXGBE_ADVTXD_DCMD_EOP)
> >
> > +typedef int (*ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t)(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq,
> > +uint32_t free_cnt);
> >
> > /* Takes an ethdev and a queue and sets up the tx function to be used based
> on
> > * the queue parameters. Used in tx_queue_setup by primary process
> > and then @@ -285,6 +287,14 @@ int
> > ixgbe_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check(struct rte_eth_dev *dev); int
> > ixgbe_rxq_vec_setup(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq); void
> > ixgbe_rx_queue_release_mbufs_vec(struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq);
> >
> > +void ixgbe_set_tx_done_cleanup_func(ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t fn);
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_t ixgbe_get_tx_done_cleanup_func(void);
> > +
> > +int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup(void *txq, uint32_t free_cnt); int
> > +ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_scalar(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t
> > +free_cnt); int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_vec(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq,
> > +uint32_t free_cnt); int ixgbe_tx_done_cleanup_simple(struct
> > +ixgbe_tx_queue *txq, uint32_t free_cnt);
> > +
> > extern const uint32_t ptype_table[IXGBE_PACKET_TYPE_MAX];
> > extern const uint32_t ptype_table_tn[IXGBE_PACKET_TYPE_TN_MAX];
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-10 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 5:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03 5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03 5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03 5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-03 5:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-20 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24 2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24 2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] net/fm10k: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24 2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-26 8:24 ` Xing, Beilei
2019-12-24 2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24 2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-24 2:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 13:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2019-12-30 12:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-03 9:01 ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-05 23:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-06 9:03 ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-06 13:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-07 10:46 ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-07 14:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-08 10:15 ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-08 15:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-30 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-09 14:01 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10 10:08 ` Di, ChenxuX [this message]
2020-01-10 12:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-09 10:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 9:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-10 13:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-10 9:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/4] drivers/net: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/4] net/i40e: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-13 9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-14 1:55 ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-14 12:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-15 14:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 1:40 ` Di, ChenxuX
2020-01-16 7:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: cleanup for vec path check Xiaolong Ye
2020-01-16 10:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-17 2:21 ` Yang, Qiming
2020-01-16 8:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/4] net/ice: cleanup Tx buffers Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13 9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-16 8:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 14:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-16 15:23 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-13 9:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/4] net/e1000: " Chenxu Di
2020-01-13 11:08 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-14 2:49 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-01-14 2:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] drivers/net: " Ye Xiaolong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B926E44943CB04AA3A39AC16328CE39B95155@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=chenxux.di@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).