DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
To: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>,
	Yerden Zhumabekov <e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] random pkt generator PMD
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:25:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D8912647A065C2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9dee2a6e-7aae-fbfa-18ab-16fce71a3144@redhat.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmatilai@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 1:24 PM
> To: Yerden Zhumabekov <e_zhumabekov@sts.kz>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] random pkt generator PMD
> 
> On 06/15/2016 03:14 PM, Yerden Zhumabekov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 15.06.2016 17:25, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> On 06/15/2016 02:10 PM, Yerden Zhumabekov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 15.06.2016 16:43, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello everybody,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> DPDK already got a number of PMDs for various eth devices, it even
> has
> >>>>> PMD emulations for backends such as pcap, sw rings etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've been thinking about the idea of having PMD which would
> generate
> >>>>> mbufs on the fly in some randomized fashion. This would serve goals
> >>>>> like, for example:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) running tests for applications with network processing capabilities
> >>>>> without additional software packet generators;
> >>>>> 2) making performance measurements with no hw inteference;
> >>>>> 3) ability to run without root privileges, --no-pci, --no-huge, for CI
> >>>>> build, so on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maybe there's no such need, and these goals may be achieved by
> other
> >>>>> means and this idea is flawed? Any thoughts?
> >>>> How about a Perl/Python script to generate a PCAP file with random
> >>>> packets and then feed the PCAP file to the PCAP PMD?
> >>>>
> >>>> Random can mean different requirements for different
> >>>> users/application, I think it is difficult to fit this  under a simple
> >>>> generic API. Customizing the script for different requirements if a
> >>>> far better option in my opinion.
> >>>
> >>> AFAIK, the thing about pcap pmd is that one needs to rewind pcap file
> >>> once pcap pmd reaches its end. It requires additional (non-generic)
> >>> handling in app code.
> >>
> >> So add a loop-mode to pcap pmd?
> >
> > It would be nice to have an option like "...,rewind=1,...".
> 
> As Cristian points out in
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-June/041589.html, the current pmd
> behavior of stopping is the odd man out in the pmd crowd.
> 
> Rather than whether to rewind or not, I'd make the number of loops
> configurable, defaulting to forever and 1 being the equal to current
> behavior.
> 
> 	- Panu -

+1

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-15 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15  9:43 Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15  9:49 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-15 10:03   ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15 10:07     ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-21  8:43       ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15 10:43 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-06-15 11:10   ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15 11:25     ` Panu Matilainen
2016-06-15 12:14       ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15 12:24         ` Panu Matilainen
2016-06-15 12:25           ` Dumitrescu, Cristian [this message]
2016-06-15 12:54             ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15 13:03               ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-06-15 13:30                 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2016-06-15 11:25     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-06-15 12:11       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2016-06-15 11:40     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-15 11:48     ` Mcnamara, John
2016-06-15 11:50 ` Jay Rolette
2016-06-15 12:11   ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15 12:33     ` Jay Rolette
2016-06-15 12:48       ` Yerden Zhumabekov
2016-06-15 13:02 ` Neil Horman
2016-06-16  6:20   ` Yerden Zhumabekov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D8912647A065C2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=e_zhumabekov@sts.kz \
    --cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).