From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7FBDE0;
 Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:21:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 20 Sep 2017 05:21:14 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,421,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="1016570436"
Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2017 05:21:11 -0700
Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.167]) by
 IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.180]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002;
 Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:21:12 +0100
From: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
To: "Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>, "Iremonger, Bernard"
 <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Yigit, Ferruh"
 <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "Ananyev, Konstantin"
 <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, "adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com"
 <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
CC: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>, "stable@dpdk.org"
 <stable@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] librte_table: fix acl entry add and
 delete functions
Thread-Index: AQHTMJL3YlF1NOLqZUGp5bp7dThq/aK9tF1g
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:21:11 +0000
Message-ID: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BABCE7F@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1504693668-2062-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
 <1504802598-27296-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
 <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D33253912@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D33253912@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] librte_table: fix acl entry add
	and	delete functions
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:21:16 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Singh, Jasvinder
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 4:30 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] librte_table: fix acl entry add an=
d
> delete functions
>=20
> Hi Bernard,
>=20
> <snip>
>=20
> > --- a/lib/librte_table/rte_table_acl.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_table/rte_table_acl.c
> > @@ -316,8 +316,7 @@ struct rte_table_acl {
> >  		if (status =3D=3D 0) {
> >  			*key_found =3D 1;
> >  			*entry_ptr =3D &acl->memory[i * acl->entry_size];
> > -			memcpy(*entry_ptr, entry, acl->entry_size);
> > -
> > +			memcpy(entry, *entry_ptr, acl->entry_size);
> >  			return 0;
> >  		}
> >  	}
>=20
> In this case, table entry which is being added already presents in the ta=
ble.
> So, first the pointer to that entry from the memory[] that stores the  pi=
peline
> table data(struct rte_pipeline_table_entry) associated with key is retrie=
ved
> and the changes (action and metadara) are stored in the internal table
> pointed by action_table. So, above fix doesn't seem correct.
>=20
> > @@ -353,8 +352,8 @@ struct rte_table_acl {
> >  		rte_acl_free(acl->ctx);
> >  	acl->ctx =3D ctx;
> >  	*key_found =3D 0;
> > -	*entry_ptr =3D &acl->memory[free_pos * acl->entry_size];
> > -	memcpy(*entry_ptr, entry, acl->entry_size);
> > +	*entry_ptr =3D &acl->acl_rule_memory[free_pos * acl->entry_size];
> > +	memcpy(entry, *entry_ptr, acl->entry_size);
> >
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -435,7 +434,7 @@ struct rte_table_acl {
> >  	acl->ctx =3D ctx;
> >  	*key_found =3D 1;
> >  	if (entry !=3D NULL)
> > -		memcpy(entry, &acl->memory[pos * acl->entry_size],
> > +		memcpy(entry, &acl->acl_rule_memory[pos * acl-
> > >entry_size],
> >  			acl->entry_size);
>=20
>=20
> Above fixes also seems not correct. As per documentation, *entry_ptr is
> intended to store the handle to the pipeline table entry containing the d=
ata
> associated with the current key instead of pointing to memory used to sto=
re
> the acl rules, etc. Please refer rte_table_acl_create() where memory is
> initialized and organized to stores different types of internal tables (p=
ointed
> by action_table, acl_rule_list and acl_rule_memory).

NACK

Fully agree with Jasvinder.

Existing code is correct, proposed code changes are wrong.