* [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd?
@ 2018-12-13 9:49 bai bakari
2018-12-13 18:15 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: bai bakari @ 2018-12-13 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi,
I test the performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd, and get the conclusion is:
l2fwd is three times better than test-pipeline, that confused me.
In principle it should be test-pipeline is better than l2fwd?
Anyone can tell me the reason, thank you in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd?
2018-12-13 9:49 [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd? bai bakari
@ 2018-12-13 18:15 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dumitrescu, Cristian @ 2018-12-13 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bai bakari, dev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of bai bakari
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:50 AM
> To: dev <dev@dpdk.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd?
>
> Hi,
>
> I test the performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd, and get the conclusion is:
> l2fwd is three times better than test-pipeline, that confused me.
> In principle it should be test-pipeline is better than l2fwd?
>
>
> Anyone can tell me the reason, thank you in advance.
How did you test it? Command line and setup description should help understanding what you're trying to do.
Thanks,
Cristian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-13 18:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-13 9:49 [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd? bai bakari
2018-12-13 18:15 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).