From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAB81B576 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 19:15:06 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Dec 2018 10:15:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,349,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="118601135" Received: from irsmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.99]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Dec 2018 10:15:04 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.26]) by IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.125]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:15:04 +0000 From: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" To: bai bakari <912873551@qq.com>, dev Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd? Thread-Index: AQHUkslWxIHzqK2HW0WbvnWpL4mxV6V8+cCw Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:15:03 +0000 Message-ID: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891268E8146F6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZTk1MDY2ZWItZDkxMC00YjFmLWExYWQtY2FjZGJiNWU5MzgyIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiOXhcL2dkbzUwbDNYOVwvQTR6R0JKSGxjSGhZSDd2Tkg2czV2V2Iyd2Z2bUVxNFVwR1EyVDNRNVFyaDljbTRiZ2krIn0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:15:07 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of bai bakari > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:50 AM > To: dev > Subject: [dpdk-dev] The performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd? >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I test the performance of test-pipeline and l2fwd, and get the conclusion= is: > l2fwd is three times better than test-pipeline, that confused me. > In principle it should be test-pipeline is better than l2fwd? >=20 >=20 > Anyone can tell me the reason, thank you in advance. How did you test it? Command line and setup description should help underst= anding what you're trying to do. Thanks, Cristian