* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling
@ 2020-03-10 9:48 Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] net/sfc: set priority of created filters to manual Andrew Rybchenko
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Rybchenko @ 2020-03-10 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
RTE flow API allows to add filters which clash with filters
installed by the driver itself. The series fixes the case
handling.
Igor Romanov (5):
net/sfc: set priority of created filters to manual
net/sfc/base: reduce filter priorities to implemented only
net/sfc/base: reject automatic filter creation by users
net/sfc/base: refactor filter lookup loop in EF10
net/sfc/base: handle manual and auto filter clashes in EF10
drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c | 559 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h | 4 +-
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h | 13 +-
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c | 26 +-
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h | 21 +-
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c | 1 +
6 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] net/sfc: set priority of created filters to manual
2020-03-10 9:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Andrew Rybchenko
@ 2020-03-10 9:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/sfc/base: reduce filter priorities to implemented only Andrew Rybchenko
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Rybchenko @ 2020-03-10 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Igor Romanov, stable
From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
The priority should be explicitly set to manual for correct
usage of libefx filters.
Fixes: a9825ccf5bb8 ("net/sfc: support flow API filters")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
index ec0ca3cd6..83414b1bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_flow.c
@@ -1164,6 +1164,7 @@ sfc_flow_parse_attr(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
spec->type = SFC_FLOW_SPEC_FILTER;
spec_filter->template.efs_flags |= EFX_FILTER_FLAG_RX;
spec_filter->template.efs_rss_context = EFX_RSS_CONTEXT_DEFAULT;
+ spec_filter->template.efs_priority = EFX_FILTER_PRI_MANUAL;
} else {
rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_TRANSFER, attr,
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/sfc/base: reduce filter priorities to implemented only
2020-03-10 9:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] net/sfc: set priority of created filters to manual Andrew Rybchenko
@ 2020-03-10 9:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/sfc/base: reject automatic filter creation by users Andrew Rybchenko
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Rybchenko @ 2020-03-10 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Igor Romanov, stable
From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Only implemented filter priorities are manual and auto. Remove
unused priorities since exposing unimplemented functionality
is of no benefit.
Tx filter specification default priority is changed to manual,
since required priority does not differ from it in the implementation.
Fixes: f9565517ff4f ("net/sfc/base: import filters support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h | 6 +-----
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
index 53ddaa987..c609c700f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
@@ -2950,16 +2950,12 @@ typedef uint8_t efx_filter_flags_t;
typedef uint32_t efx_filter_match_flags_t;
typedef enum efx_filter_priority_s {
- EFX_FILTER_PRI_HINT = 0, /* Performance hint */
- EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO, /* Automatic filter based on device
+ EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO = 0, /* Automatic filter based on device
* address list or hardware
* requirements. This may only be used
* by the filter implementation for
* each NIC type. */
EFX_FILTER_PRI_MANUAL, /* Manually configured filter */
- EFX_FILTER_PRI_REQUIRED, /* Required for correct behaviour of the
- * client (e.g. SR-IOV, HyperV VMQ etc.)
- */
} efx_filter_priority_t;
/*
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
index 7efb38064..575f6228b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ efx_filter_spec_init_tx(
EFSYS_ASSERT3P(etp, !=, NULL);
memset(spec, 0, sizeof (*spec));
- spec->efs_priority = EFX_FILTER_PRI_REQUIRED;
+ spec->efs_priority = EFX_FILTER_PRI_MANUAL;
spec->efs_flags = EFX_FILTER_FLAG_TX;
spec->efs_dmaq_id = (uint16_t)etp->et_index;
}
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/sfc/base: reject automatic filter creation by users
2020-03-10 9:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] net/sfc: set priority of created filters to manual Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/sfc/base: reduce filter priorities to implemented only Andrew Rybchenko
@ 2020-03-10 9:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/sfc/base: refactor filter lookup loop in EF10 Andrew Rybchenko
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Rybchenko @ 2020-03-10 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Igor Romanov, stable
From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
The automatic filter priority may only be used by filter implementation,
so reject the attempts to create such filters by client drivers.
Fixes: f9565517ff4f ("net/sfc/base: import filters support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
index 575f6228b..36332a280 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
@@ -93,8 +93,15 @@ efx_filter_insert(
goto fail2;
}
+ if (spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO) {
+ rc = EINVAL;
+ goto fail3;
+ }
+
return (efop->efo_add(enp, spec, B_FALSE));
+fail3:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail3);
fail2:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
fail1:
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/sfc/base: refactor filter lookup loop in EF10
2020-03-10 9:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Andrew Rybchenko
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/sfc/base: reject automatic filter creation by users Andrew Rybchenko
@ 2020-03-10 9:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] net/sfc/base: handle manual and auto filter clashes " Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-11 11:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Ferruh Yigit
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Rybchenko @ 2020-03-10 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Igor Romanov, stable
From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
The code is refactored to make it more clear and allow for
more convenient further changes.
Fixes: e7cd430c864f ("net/sfc/base: import SFN7xxx family support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c | 80 ++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c
index e4f8de51c..5578765ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c
@@ -628,56 +628,52 @@ ef10_filter_add_internal(
* else a free slot to insert at. If any of them are busy,
* we have to wait and retry.
*/
- for (;;) {
- ins_index = -1;
- depth = 1;
- EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
- locked = B_TRUE;
+retry:
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+ locked = B_TRUE;
- for (;;) {
- i = (hash + depth) & (EFX_EF10_FILTER_TBL_ROWS - 1);
- saved_spec = ef10_filter_entry_spec(eftp, i);
+ ins_index = -1;
- if (!saved_spec) {
- if (ins_index < 0) {
- ins_index = i;
- }
- } else if (ef10_filter_equal(spec, saved_spec)) {
- if (ef10_filter_entry_is_busy(eftp, i))
- break;
- if (saved_spec->efs_priority
- == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO) {
- ins_index = i;
- goto found;
- } else if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
- if (may_replace) {
- ins_index = i;
- goto found;
- } else {
- rc = EEXIST;
- goto fail1;
- }
- }
+ for (depth = 1; depth <= EF10_FILTER_SEARCH_LIMIT; depth++) {
+ i = (hash + depth) & (EFX_EF10_FILTER_TBL_ROWS - 1);
+ saved_spec = ef10_filter_entry_spec(eftp, i);
+
+ if (saved_spec == NULL) {
+ if (ins_index < 0)
+ ins_index = i;
+ } else if (ef10_filter_equal(spec, saved_spec)) {
+ if (ef10_filter_entry_is_busy(eftp, i)) {
+ EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+ locked = B_FALSE;
+ goto retry;
+ }
- /* Leave existing */
+ if (saved_spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO) {
+ ins_index = i;
+ goto found;
}
- /*
- * Once we reach the maximum search depth, use
- * the first suitable slot or return EBUSY if
- * there was none.
- */
- if (depth == EF10_FILTER_SEARCH_LIMIT) {
- if (ins_index < 0) {
- rc = EBUSY;
- goto fail2;
+ if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
+ if (may_replace) {
+ ins_index = i;
+ goto found;
+ } else {
+ rc = EEXIST;
+ goto fail1;
}
- goto found;
}
- depth++;
+
+ /* Leave existing */
}
- EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
- locked = B_FALSE;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Once we reach the maximum search depth, use the first suitable slot
+ * or return EBUSY if there was none.
+ */
+ if (ins_index < 0) {
+ rc = EBUSY;
+ goto fail2;
}
found:
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] net/sfc/base: handle manual and auto filter clashes in EF10
2020-03-10 9:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Andrew Rybchenko
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/sfc/base: refactor filter lookup loop in EF10 Andrew Rybchenko
@ 2020-03-10 9:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-11 11:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Ferruh Yigit
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Rybchenko @ 2020-03-10 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Igor Romanov, stable
From: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Make user filters a priority in EF10 datapath. When a manual
filter with a specification that is equal to an existing auto
filter is inserted, the manual filter:
- replaces auto filter if the specification is exclusive;
- is inserted along existing auto filter otherwise;
In the first case the auto filter that was replaced is saved.
This saved filter can be updated on filter reconfiguration and
is restored on the manual filter removal.
Fixes: e7cd430c864f ("net/sfc/base: import SFN7xxx family support")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c | 513 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h | 4 +-
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h | 7 +
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c | 17 +-
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h | 21 +-
5 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c
index 5578765ab..597ec3493 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_filter.c
@@ -590,6 +590,231 @@ ef10_filter_restore(
return (rc);
}
+enum ef10_filter_add_action_e {
+ /* Insert a new filter */
+ EF10_FILTER_ADD_NEW,
+ /*
+ * Replace old filter with a new, overriding the old one
+ * if it has lower priority.
+ */
+ EF10_FILTER_ADD_REPLACE,
+ /* Store new, lower priority filter as overridden by old filter */
+ EF10_FILTER_ADD_STORE,
+ /* Special case for AUTO filters, remove AUTO_OLD flag */
+ EF10_FILTER_ADD_REFRESH,
+};
+
+static __checkReturn efx_rc_t
+ef10_filter_add_lookup_equal_spec(
+ __in efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
+ __in efx_filter_spec_t *probe_spec,
+ __in efx_filter_replacement_policy_t policy,
+ __out boolean_t *found)
+{
+ efx_rc_t rc;
+
+ /* Refreshing AUTO filter */
+ if (spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO &&
+ probe_spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO) {
+ *found = B_TRUE;
+ return (0);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * With exclusive filters, higher priority ones
+ * override lower priority ones, and lower priority
+ * ones are stored in case the higher priority one
+ * is removed.
+ */
+ if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
+ switch (policy) {
+ case EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_HIGHER_OR_EQUAL_PRIORITY:
+ if (spec->efs_priority == probe_spec->efs_priority) {
+ *found = B_TRUE;
+ break;
+ }
+ /* Fall-through */
+ case EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_HIGHER_PRIORITY:
+ if (spec->efs_priority > probe_spec->efs_priority) {
+ *found = B_TRUE;
+ break;
+ }
+ /* Fall-through */
+ case EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER:
+ /*
+ * Lower priority filter needs to be
+ * stored. It does *not* replace the
+ * old one. That is why EEXIST is not
+ * returned in that case.
+ */
+ if (spec->efs_priority < probe_spec->efs_priority) {
+ *found = B_TRUE;
+ break;
+ } else {
+ rc = EEXIST;
+ goto fail1;
+ }
+ default:
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(0);
+ rc = EEXIST;
+ goto fail2;
+ }
+ } else {
+ *found = B_FALSE;
+ }
+
+ return (0);
+
+fail2:
+ EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
+
+fail1:
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, efx_rc_t, rc);
+
+ return (rc);
+}
+
+
+static void
+ef10_filter_add_select_action(
+ __in efx_filter_spec_t *saved_spec,
+ __in efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
+ __out enum ef10_filter_add_action_e *action,
+ __out efx_filter_spec_t **overridden_spec)
+{
+ efx_filter_spec_t *overridden = NULL;
+
+ if (saved_spec == NULL) {
+ *action = EF10_FILTER_ADD_NEW;
+ } else if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec) == B_FALSE) {
+ /*
+ * Non-exclusive filters are always stored in separate entries
+ * in the table. The only case involving a saved spec is
+ * refreshing an AUTO filter.
+ */
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(saved_spec->efs_overridden_spec == NULL);
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO);
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(saved_spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO);
+ *action = EF10_FILTER_ADD_REFRESH;
+ } else {
+ /* Exclusive filters stored in the same entry */
+ if (spec->efs_priority > saved_spec->efs_priority) {
+ /*
+ * Insert a high priority filter over a lower priority
+ * one. Only two priority levels are implemented, so
+ * there must not already be an overridden filter.
+ */
+ EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(EFX_FILTER_NPRI == 2);
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(saved_spec->efs_overridden_spec == NULL);
+ overridden = saved_spec;
+ *action = EF10_FILTER_ADD_REPLACE;
+ } else if (spec->efs_priority == saved_spec->efs_priority) {
+ /* Replace in-place or refresh an existing filter */
+ if (spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO)
+ *action = EF10_FILTER_ADD_REFRESH;
+ else
+ *action = EF10_FILTER_ADD_REPLACE;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Insert a lower priority filter, storing it in case
+ * the higher priority filter is removed.
+ *
+ * Currently there are only two priority levels, so this
+ * must be an AUTO filter.
+ */
+ EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(EFX_FILTER_NPRI == 2);
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO);
+ if (saved_spec->efs_overridden_spec != NULL) {
+ *action = EF10_FILTER_ADD_REFRESH;
+ } else {
+ overridden = spec;
+ *action = EF10_FILTER_ADD_STORE;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ *overridden_spec = overridden;
+}
+
+static __checkReturn efx_rc_t
+ef10_filter_add_execute_action(
+ __in efx_nic_t *enp,
+ __in efx_filter_spec_t *saved_spec,
+ __in efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
+ __in efx_filter_spec_t *overridden_spec,
+ __in enum ef10_filter_add_action_e action,
+ __in int ins_index)
+{
+ ef10_filter_table_t *eftp = enp->en_filter.ef_ef10_filter_table;
+ efsys_lock_state_t state;
+ efx_rc_t rc;
+
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
+ if (action == EF10_FILTER_ADD_REFRESH) {
+ ef10_filter_set_entry_not_auto_old(eftp, ins_index);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ } else if (action == EF10_FILTER_ADD_STORE) {
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(overridden_spec != NULL);
+ saved_spec->efs_overridden_spec = overridden_spec;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
+ switch (action) {
+ case EF10_FILTER_ADD_REPLACE:
+ /*
+ * On replacing the filter handle may change after a
+ * successful replace operation.
+ */
+ rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(enp, spec,
+ MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_REPLACE,
+ &eftp->eft_entry[ins_index].efe_handle);
+ break;
+ case EF10_FILTER_ADD_NEW:
+ if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
+ rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(enp, spec,
+ MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_INSERT,
+ &eftp->eft_entry[ins_index].efe_handle);
+ } else {
+ rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(enp, spec,
+ MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_SUBSCRIBE,
+ &eftp->eft_entry[ins_index].efe_handle);
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ rc = EINVAL;
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(0);
+ break;
+ }
+ if (rc != 0)
+ goto fail1;
+
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
+ if (action == EF10_FILTER_ADD_REPLACE) {
+ /* Update the fields that may differ */
+ saved_spec->efs_priority = spec->efs_priority;
+ saved_spec->efs_flags = spec->efs_flags;
+ saved_spec->efs_rss_context = spec->efs_rss_context;
+ saved_spec->efs_dmaq_id = spec->efs_dmaq_id;
+
+ if (overridden_spec != NULL)
+ saved_spec->efs_overridden_spec = overridden_spec;
+ }
+
+out_unlock:
+ EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
+ return (0);
+
+fail1:
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, efx_rc_t, rc);
+
+ return (rc);
+}
+
/*
* An arbitrary search limit for the software hash table. As per the linux net
* driver.
@@ -600,22 +825,24 @@ static __checkReturn efx_rc_t
ef10_filter_add_internal(
__in efx_nic_t *enp,
__inout efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
- __in boolean_t may_replace,
+ __in efx_filter_replacement_policy_t policy,
__out_opt uint32_t *filter_id)
{
efx_rc_t rc;
ef10_filter_table_t *eftp = enp->en_filter.ef_ef10_filter_table;
+ enum ef10_filter_add_action_e action;
+ efx_filter_spec_t *overridden_spec = NULL;
efx_filter_spec_t *saved_spec;
uint32_t hash;
unsigned int depth;
int ins_index;
- boolean_t replacing = B_FALSE;
- unsigned int i;
efsys_lock_state_t state;
boolean_t locked = B_FALSE;
EFSYS_ASSERT(EFX_FAMILY_IS_EF10(enp));
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(spec->efs_overridden_spec == NULL);
+
hash = ef10_filter_hash(spec);
/*
@@ -635,35 +862,33 @@ ef10_filter_add_internal(
ins_index = -1;
for (depth = 1; depth <= EF10_FILTER_SEARCH_LIMIT; depth++) {
- i = (hash + depth) & (EFX_EF10_FILTER_TBL_ROWS - 1);
- saved_spec = ef10_filter_entry_spec(eftp, i);
+ unsigned int probe_index;
+ efx_filter_spec_t *probe_spec;
- if (saved_spec == NULL) {
+ probe_index = (hash + depth) & (EFX_EF10_FILTER_TBL_ROWS - 1);
+ probe_spec = ef10_filter_entry_spec(eftp, probe_index);
+
+ if (probe_spec == NULL) {
if (ins_index < 0)
- ins_index = i;
- } else if (ef10_filter_equal(spec, saved_spec)) {
- if (ef10_filter_entry_is_busy(eftp, i)) {
+ ins_index = probe_index;
+ } else if (ef10_filter_equal(spec, probe_spec)) {
+ boolean_t found;
+
+ if (ef10_filter_entry_is_busy(eftp, probe_index)) {
EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
locked = B_FALSE;
goto retry;
}
- if (saved_spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO) {
- ins_index = i;
- goto found;
- }
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_lookup_equal_spec(spec,
+ probe_spec, policy, &found);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ goto fail1;
- if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
- if (may_replace) {
- ins_index = i;
- goto found;
- } else {
- rc = EEXIST;
- goto fail1;
- }
+ if (found != B_FALSE) {
+ ins_index = probe_index;
+ break;
}
-
- /* Leave existing */
}
}
@@ -676,93 +901,90 @@ ef10_filter_add_internal(
goto fail2;
}
-found:
/*
- * Create a software table entry if necessary, and mark it
- * busy. We might yet fail to insert, but any attempt to
- * insert a conflicting filter while we're waiting for the
- * firmware must find the busy entry.
+ * Mark software table entry busy. We might yet fail to insert,
+ * but any attempt to insert a conflicting filter while we're
+ * waiting for the firmware must find the busy entry.
*/
+ ef10_filter_set_entry_busy(eftp, ins_index);
+
saved_spec = ef10_filter_entry_spec(eftp, ins_index);
- if (saved_spec) {
- if (saved_spec->efs_priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO) {
- /* This is a filter we are refreshing */
- ef10_filter_set_entry_not_auto_old(eftp, ins_index);
- goto out_unlock;
+ ef10_filter_add_select_action(saved_spec, spec, &action,
+ &overridden_spec);
- }
- replacing = B_TRUE;
- } else {
- EFSYS_KMEM_ALLOC(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*spec), saved_spec);
- if (!saved_spec) {
+ /*
+ * Allocate a new filter if found entry is empty or
+ * a filter should be overridden.
+ */
+ if (overridden_spec != NULL || saved_spec == NULL) {
+ efx_filter_spec_t *new_spec;
+
+ EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+ locked = B_FALSE;
+
+ EFSYS_KMEM_ALLOC(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*new_spec), new_spec);
+ if (new_spec == NULL) {
rc = ENOMEM;
+ overridden_spec = NULL;
goto fail3;
}
- *saved_spec = *spec;
- ef10_filter_set_entry(eftp, ins_index, saved_spec);
+
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+ locked = B_TRUE;
+
+ if (saved_spec == NULL) {
+ *new_spec = *spec;
+ ef10_filter_set_entry(eftp, ins_index, new_spec);
+ } else {
+ *new_spec = *overridden_spec;
+ overridden_spec = new_spec;
+ }
}
- ef10_filter_set_entry_busy(eftp, ins_index);
EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
locked = B_FALSE;
- /*
- * On replacing the filter handle may change after after a successful
- * replace operation.
- */
- if (replacing) {
- rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(enp, spec,
- MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_REPLACE,
- &eftp->eft_entry[ins_index].efe_handle);
- } else if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
- rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(enp, spec,
- MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_INSERT,
- &eftp->eft_entry[ins_index].efe_handle);
- } else {
- rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(enp, spec,
- MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_SUBSCRIBE,
- &eftp->eft_entry[ins_index].efe_handle);
- }
-
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_execute_action(enp, saved_spec, spec,
+ overridden_spec, action, ins_index);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail4;
- EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
- locked = B_TRUE;
-
- if (replacing) {
- /* Update the fields that may differ */
- saved_spec->efs_priority = spec->efs_priority;
- saved_spec->efs_flags = spec->efs_flags;
- saved_spec->efs_rss_context = spec->efs_rss_context;
- saved_spec->efs_dmaq_id = spec->efs_dmaq_id;
- }
+ if (filter_id)
+ *filter_id = ins_index;
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
ef10_filter_set_entry_not_busy(eftp, ins_index);
-
-out_unlock:
-
EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
- locked = B_FALSE;
-
- if (filter_id)
- *filter_id = ins_index;
return (0);
fail4:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail4);
- if (!replacing) {
- EFSYS_KMEM_FREE(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*spec), saved_spec);
- saved_spec = NULL;
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(locked == B_FALSE);
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
+ if (action == EF10_FILTER_ADD_NEW) {
+ EFSYS_KMEM_FREE(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*spec),
+ ef10_filter_entry_spec(eftp, ins_index));
+ ef10_filter_set_entry(eftp, ins_index, NULL);
}
- ef10_filter_set_entry_not_busy(eftp, ins_index);
- ef10_filter_set_entry(eftp, ins_index, NULL);
+
+ EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
+ if (overridden_spec != NULL)
+ EFSYS_KMEM_FREE(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*spec), overridden_spec);
fail3:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail3);
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(locked == B_FALSE);
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
+ ef10_filter_set_entry_not_busy(eftp, ins_index);
+
+ EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+
fail2:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
@@ -779,11 +1001,11 @@ ef10_filter_add_internal(
ef10_filter_add(
__in efx_nic_t *enp,
__inout efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
- __in boolean_t may_replace)
+ __in enum efx_filter_replacement_policy_e policy)
{
efx_rc_t rc;
- rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, spec, may_replace, NULL);
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, spec, policy, NULL);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail1;
@@ -795,11 +1017,15 @@ ef10_filter_add(
return (rc);
}
-
+/*
+ * Delete a filter by index from the filter table with priority
+ * that is not higher than specified.
+ */
static __checkReturn efx_rc_t
ef10_filter_delete_internal(
__in efx_nic_t *enp,
- __in uint32_t filter_id)
+ __in uint32_t filter_id,
+ __in efx_filter_priority_t priority)
{
efx_rc_t rc;
ef10_filter_table_t *table = enp->en_filter.ef_ef10_filter_table;
@@ -821,7 +1047,8 @@ ef10_filter_delete_internal(
EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
}
if ((spec = ef10_filter_entry_spec(table, filter_idx)) != NULL) {
- ef10_filter_set_entry_busy(table, filter_idx);
+ if (spec->efs_priority <= priority)
+ ef10_filter_set_entry_busy(table, filter_idx);
}
EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
@@ -830,31 +1057,53 @@ ef10_filter_delete_internal(
goto fail1;
}
- /*
- * Try to remove the hardware filter. This may fail if the MC has
- * rebooted (which frees all hardware filter resources).
- */
- if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
- rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_delete(enp,
- MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_REMOVE,
- &table->eft_entry[filter_idx].efe_handle);
+ if (spec->efs_priority > priority) {
+ /*
+ * Applied filter stays, but overriden filter is removed since
+ * next user request to delete the applied filter should not
+ * restore outdated filter.
+ */
+ if (spec->efs_overridden_spec != NULL) {
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(spec->efs_overridden_spec->efs_overridden_spec ==
+ NULL);
+ EFSYS_KMEM_FREE(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*spec),
+ spec->efs_overridden_spec);
+ spec->efs_overridden_spec = NULL;
+ }
} else {
- rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_delete(enp,
- MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_UNSUBSCRIBE,
- &table->eft_entry[filter_idx].efe_handle);
- }
+ /*
+ * Try to remove the hardware filter or replace it with the
+ * saved automatic filter. This may fail if the MC has
+ * rebooted (which frees all hardware filter resources).
+ */
+ if (spec->efs_overridden_spec != NULL) {
+ rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_add(enp,
+ spec->efs_overridden_spec,
+ MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_REPLACE,
+ &table->eft_entry[filter_idx].efe_handle);
+ } else if (ef10_filter_is_exclusive(spec)) {
+ rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_delete(enp,
+ MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_REMOVE,
+ &table->eft_entry[filter_idx].efe_handle);
+ } else {
+ rc = efx_mcdi_filter_op_delete(enp,
+ MC_CMD_FILTER_OP_IN_OP_UNSUBSCRIBE,
+ &table->eft_entry[filter_idx].efe_handle);
+ }
- /* Free the software table entry */
- EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
- ef10_filter_set_entry_not_busy(table, filter_idx);
- ef10_filter_set_entry(table, filter_idx, NULL);
- EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+ /* Free the software table entry */
+ EFSYS_LOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
+ ef10_filter_set_entry_not_busy(table, filter_idx);
+ ef10_filter_set_entry(table, filter_idx,
+ spec->efs_overridden_spec);
+ EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
- EFSYS_KMEM_FREE(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*spec), spec);
+ EFSYS_KMEM_FREE(enp->en_esip, sizeof (*spec), spec);
- /* Check result of hardware filter removal */
- if (rc != 0)
- goto fail2;
+ /* Check result of hardware filter removal */
+ if (rc != 0)
+ goto fail2;
+ }
return (0);
@@ -867,6 +1116,25 @@ ef10_filter_delete_internal(
return (rc);
}
+static void
+ef10_filter_delete_auto(
+ __in efx_nic_t *enp,
+ __in uint32_t filter_id)
+{
+ ef10_filter_table_t *table = enp->en_filter.ef_ef10_filter_table;
+ uint32_t filter_idx = filter_id % EFX_EF10_FILTER_TBL_ROWS;
+
+ /*
+ * AUTO_OLD flag is cleared since the auto filter that is to be removed
+ * may not be the filter at the specified index itself, but the filter
+ * that is overriden by it.
+ */
+ ef10_filter_set_entry_not_auto_old(table, filter_idx);
+
+ (void) ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp, filter_idx,
+ EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO);
+}
+
__checkReturn efx_rc_t
ef10_filter_delete(
__in efx_nic_t *enp,
@@ -906,7 +1174,7 @@ ef10_filter_delete(
EFSYS_UNLOCK(enp->en_eslp, state);
locked = B_FALSE;
- rc = ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp, i);
+ rc = ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp, i, EFX_FILTER_PRI_MANUAL);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail2;
@@ -1131,7 +1399,7 @@ ef10_filter_insert_unicast(
if (rc != 0)
goto fail1;
- rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, B_TRUE,
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER,
&eftp->eft_unicst_filter_indexes[eftp->eft_unicst_filter_count]);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail2;
@@ -1165,7 +1433,7 @@ ef10_filter_insert_all_unicast(
rc = efx_filter_spec_set_uc_def(&spec);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail1;
- rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, B_TRUE,
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER,
&eftp->eft_unicst_filter_indexes[eftp->eft_unicst_filter_count]);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail2;
@@ -1235,8 +1503,8 @@ ef10_filter_insert_multicast_list(
}
}
- rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, B_TRUE,
- &filter_index);
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec,
+ EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER, &filter_index);
if (rc == 0) {
eftp->eft_mulcst_filter_indexes[filter_count] =
@@ -1263,8 +1531,8 @@ ef10_filter_insert_multicast_list(
goto rollback;
}
- rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, B_TRUE,
- &filter_index);
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec,
+ EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER, &filter_index);
if (rc == 0) {
eftp->eft_mulcst_filter_indexes[filter_count] =
@@ -1285,7 +1553,7 @@ ef10_filter_insert_multicast_list(
/* Remove any filters we have inserted */
i = filter_count;
while (i--) {
- (void) ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp,
+ ef10_filter_delete_auto(enp,
eftp->eft_mulcst_filter_indexes[i]);
}
eftp->eft_mulcst_filter_count = 0;
@@ -1313,7 +1581,7 @@ ef10_filter_insert_all_multicast(
if (rc != 0)
goto fail1;
- rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, B_TRUE,
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER,
&eftp->eft_mulcst_filter_indexes[0]);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail2;
@@ -1416,8 +1684,9 @@ ef10_filter_insert_encap_filters(
if (rc != 0)
goto fail1;
- rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec, B_TRUE,
- &table->eft_encap_filter_indexes[
+ rc = ef10_filter_add_internal(enp, &spec,
+ EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER,
+ &table->eft_encap_filter_indexes[
table->eft_encap_filter_count]);
if (rc != 0) {
if (rc != EACCES)
@@ -1446,7 +1715,7 @@ ef10_filter_remove_old(
for (i = 0; i < EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(table->eft_entry); i++) {
if (ef10_filter_entry_is_auto_old(table, i)) {
- (void) ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp, i);
+ ef10_filter_delete_auto(enp, i);
}
}
}
@@ -1521,19 +1790,19 @@ ef10_filter_reconfigure(
* has rebooted, which removes hardware filters).
*/
for (i = 0; i < table->eft_unicst_filter_count; i++) {
- (void) ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp,
+ ef10_filter_delete_auto(enp,
table->eft_unicst_filter_indexes[i]);
}
table->eft_unicst_filter_count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < table->eft_mulcst_filter_count; i++) {
- (void) ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp,
+ ef10_filter_delete_auto(enp,
table->eft_mulcst_filter_indexes[i]);
}
table->eft_mulcst_filter_count = 0;
for (i = 0; i < table->eft_encap_filter_count; i++) {
- (void) ef10_filter_delete_internal(enp,
+ ef10_filter_delete_auto(enp,
table->eft_encap_filter_indexes[i]);
}
table->eft_encap_filter_count = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h b/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
index 7a0004782..67abf3b85 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
@@ -1079,6 +1079,8 @@ ef10_rx_fini(
#if EFSYS_OPT_FILTER
+enum efx_filter_replacement_policy_e;
+
typedef struct ef10_filter_handle_s {
uint32_t efh_lo;
uint32_t efh_hi;
@@ -1148,7 +1150,7 @@ ef10_filter_restore(
ef10_filter_add(
__in efx_nic_t *enp,
__inout efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
- __in boolean_t may_replace);
+ __in enum efx_filter_replacement_policy_e policy);
__checkReturn efx_rc_t
ef10_filter_delete(
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
index c609c700f..d94d3c02f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
@@ -2949,6 +2949,7 @@ typedef uint8_t efx_filter_flags_t;
typedef uint32_t efx_filter_match_flags_t;
+/* Filter priority from lowest to highest */
typedef enum efx_filter_priority_s {
EFX_FILTER_PRI_AUTO = 0, /* Automatic filter based on device
* address list or hardware
@@ -2956,6 +2957,7 @@ typedef enum efx_filter_priority_s {
* by the filter implementation for
* each NIC type. */
EFX_FILTER_PRI_MANUAL, /* Manually configured filter */
+ EFX_FILTER_NPRI,
} efx_filter_priority_t;
/*
@@ -2970,6 +2972,11 @@ typedef struct efx_filter_spec_s {
uint16_t efs_dmaq_id;
uint32_t efs_rss_context;
uint32_t efs_mark;
+ /*
+ * Saved lower-priority filter. If it is set, it is restored on
+ * filter delete operation.
+ */
+ struct efx_filter_spec_s *efs_overridden_spec;
/* Fields below here are hashed for software filter lookup */
uint16_t efs_outer_vid;
uint16_t efs_inner_vid;
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
index 36332a280..9949d05bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_filter.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static __checkReturn efx_rc_t
siena_filter_add(
__in efx_nic_t *enp,
__inout efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
- __in boolean_t may_replace);
+ __in efx_filter_replacement_policy_t policy);
static __checkReturn efx_rc_t
siena_filter_delete(
@@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ efx_filter_insert(
goto fail3;
}
- return (efop->efo_add(enp, spec, B_FALSE));
+ return (efop->efo_add(enp, spec,
+ EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_HIGHER_PRIORITY));
fail3:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail3);
@@ -1444,7 +1445,7 @@ static __checkReturn efx_rc_t
siena_filter_add(
__in efx_nic_t *enp,
__inout efx_filter_spec_t *spec,
- __in boolean_t may_replace)
+ __in efx_filter_replacement_policy_t policy)
{
efx_rc_t rc;
siena_filter_spec_t sf_spec;
@@ -1485,9 +1486,17 @@ siena_filter_add(
saved_sf_spec = &sftp->sft_spec[filter_idx];
if (siena_filter_test_used(sftp, filter_idx)) {
- if (may_replace == B_FALSE) {
+ /* All Siena filter are considered the same priority */
+ switch (policy) {
+ case EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER:
+ case EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_HIGHER_PRIORITY:
rc = EEXIST;
goto fail4;
+ case EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_HIGHER_OR_EQUAL_PRIORITY:
+ break;
+ default:
+ EFSYS_ASSERT(0);
+ break;
}
}
siena_filter_set_used(sftp, filter_idx);
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
index 85d984f65..9755f4dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
@@ -246,12 +246,31 @@ typedef struct efx_phy_ops_s {
} efx_phy_ops_t;
#if EFSYS_OPT_FILTER
+
+/*
+ * Policy for replacing existing filter when inserting a new one.
+ * Note that all policies allow for storing the new lower priority
+ * filters as overridden by existing higher priority ones. It is needed
+ * to restore the lower priority filters on higher priority ones removal.
+ */
+typedef enum efx_filter_replacement_policy_e {
+ /* Cannot replace existing filter */
+ EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_NEVER,
+ /* Higher priority filters can replace lower priotiry ones */
+ EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_HIGHER_PRIORITY,
+ /*
+ * Higher priority filters can replace lower priority ones and
+ * equal priority filters can replace each other.
+ */
+ EFX_FILTER_REPLACEMENT_HIGHER_OR_EQUAL_PRIORITY,
+} efx_filter_replacement_policy_t;
+
typedef struct efx_filter_ops_s {
efx_rc_t (*efo_init)(efx_nic_t *);
void (*efo_fini)(efx_nic_t *);
efx_rc_t (*efo_restore)(efx_nic_t *);
efx_rc_t (*efo_add)(efx_nic_t *, efx_filter_spec_t *,
- boolean_t may_replace);
+ efx_filter_replacement_policy_t policy);
efx_rc_t (*efo_delete)(efx_nic_t *, efx_filter_spec_t *);
efx_rc_t (*efo_supported_filters)(efx_nic_t *, uint32_t *,
size_t, size_t *);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling
2020-03-10 9:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Andrew Rybchenko
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] net/sfc/base: handle manual and auto filter clashes " Andrew Rybchenko
@ 2020-03-11 11:30 ` Ferruh Yigit
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2020-03-11 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Rybchenko, dev
On 3/10/2020 9:48 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> RTE flow API allows to add filters which clash with filters
> installed by the driver itself. The series fixes the case
> handling.
>
> Igor Romanov (5):
> net/sfc: set priority of created filters to manual
> net/sfc/base: reduce filter priorities to implemented only
> net/sfc/base: reject automatic filter creation by users
> net/sfc/base: refactor filter lookup loop in EF10
> net/sfc/base: handle manual and auto filter clashes in EF10
>
Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-11 11:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-10 9:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] net/sfc: set priority of created filters to manual Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/sfc/base: reduce filter priorities to implemented only Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/sfc/base: reject automatic filter creation by users Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/sfc/base: refactor filter lookup loop in EF10 Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-10 9:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] net/sfc/base: handle manual and auto filter clashes " Andrew Rybchenko
2020-03-11 11:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/sfc: fix manual and auto filters clash handling Ferruh Yigit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).