From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AAFA0C53; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADB840F35; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:39:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11BE40E5A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:39:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635928751; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=w6rekIFWXCiptVxyqM/E5SHr6eXbngUsa0De0nEfw6U=; b=HkUr9exPhqnmLU6Vl9DER0PLvsAsX7Mfn0B6geos82P6OTy0GEid70CasoKIIuu7fYr4gj V+Y6TZr8fdCMF+51/axS8TwKHYHkO/kemIHDBUX9WQR/oRv+b8RYv/QziuePvQAwiDQl1u YplZP5hKBl+1TgPmyw1SaeejVmthfIw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-254-zhWGqiuvMrOROAtBHojSzw-1; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 04:39:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: zhWGqiuvMrOROAtBHojSzw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDB598066EB; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 08:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.36] (unknown [10.39.208.36]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D70755DEFA; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 08:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3a63bda9-2ff7-30bc-87b7-48e1324d1666@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:38:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 To: David Marchand , "Xia, Chenbo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Liu, Changpeng" , Thomas Monjalon , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org References: <20211102104748.57078-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: rename driver callbacks struct X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi David, On 11/3/21 09:36, David Marchand wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:16 AM Xia, Chenbo wrote: >> Testing issues reported in patchwork is expected as SPDK uses >> this struct, so we can ignore it as SPDK will rename it when it >> adapts to DPDK 21.11 > > Please, no. > We can't simply say "ignore failure in CI". > > The SPDK build test must be disabled in CI first. > You can create a bugzilla and assign it to UNH lab. > Example: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579 > > Once done, we can merge this patch in DPDK. > > > In parallel, either prepare the patch or talk to SPDK guys to handle > this change. > Once this is done, update the bugzilla so that we can get SPDK build > tested again in CI. Thanks for the insights, I'll file a Bz and work with the SPDK team. Maxime > Thanks. > >