DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] An API for Cache Stashing with TPH
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 08:30:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b0f9515-7088-4251-91dc-2b6c858e582b@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250602223805.816816-1-wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>

Hi Wathsala,

Sorry to ask if this patchset is under development or stopped?

PCIe Steer-tag provides a mechanism for precise data stash, which
delivers a positive performance gain and is therefore a valuable
feature I think.

This patchset concludes with the statement: "the PMDs should only
enable TPH in device-specific mode", I don't think such restraints
should be made, the framework should be compatible with various
device capabilities:
1. The PCIe protocol defines two modes: one is the interrupt-vector
   mode, and the other is the device-specific mode. A device may
   choose to support either one or both.
2. If device support device-specific mode, it has a large degree of
   freedom to implement, such as locate ST table in self-defined
   place (just like '[PATCH v5 4/4] net/i40e: enable TPH in i40e'),
   and also support only stash part of data (e.g. only desc or header
   or even an offset data).
3. If device only support interrupt-vector mode (which each TLP will
   use ST from an ST table entry), we could also support it, in this
   framework, it could only report basic stash capability.

Thanks

On 6/3/2025 6:38 AM, Wathsala Vithanage wrote:
> Today, DPDK applications benefit from Direct Cache Access (DCA) features
> like Intel DDIO and Arm's write-allocate-to-SLC. However, those features
> do not allow fine-grained control of direct cache access, such as
> stashing packets into upper-level caches (L2 caches) of a processor or
> the shared cache of a chiplet. PCIe TLP Processing Hints (TPH) addresses
> this need in a vendor-agnostic manner. TPH capability has existed since
> PCI Express Base Specification revision 3.0; today, numerous Network
> Interface Cards and interconnects from different vendors support TPH
> capability. TPH comprises a steering tag (ST) and a processing hint
> (PH). ST specifies the cache level of a CPU at which the data should be
> written to (or DCAed into), while PH is a hint provided by the PCIe
> requester to the completer on an upcoming traffic pattern. Some NIC
> vendors bundle TPH capability with fine-grained control over the type of
> objects that can be stashed into CPU caches, such as
> 
> - Rx/Tx queue descriptors
> - Packet-headers
> - Packet-payloads
> - Data from a given offset from the start of a packet
> 
> Note that stashable object types are outside the scope of the PCIe
> standard; therefore, vendors could support any combination of the above
> items as they see fit.
> 
> To enable TPH and fine-grained packet stashing, this API extends the
> ethdev library and the PCI bus driver. In this design, the application
> provides hints to the PMD via the ethdev stashing API to indicate the
> underlying hardware at which CPU and cache level it prefers a packet to
> end up. Once the PMD receives a CPU and a cache-level combination (or a
> list of such combinations), it must extract the matching ST from the PCI
> bus driver for such combinations. The PCI bus driver implements the TPH
> functions in an OS specific way; for Linux, it depends on the TPH
> capabilities of the VFIO kernel driver.
> 
> An application uses the cache stashing ethdev API by first calling the
> rte_eth_dev_stashing_capabilities_get() function to find out what object
> types can be stashed into a CPU cache by the NIC out of the object types
> in the bulleted list above. This function takes a port_id and a pointer
> to a uint16_t to report back the object type flags. PMD implements the
> stashing_capabilities_get function pointer in eth_dev_ops. If the
> underlying platform or the NIC does not support TPH, this function
> returns -ENOTSUP, and the application should consider any values stored
> in the object invalid.
> 
> Once the application knows the supported object types that can be
> stashed, the next step is to set the steering tags for the packets
> associated with Rx and Tx queues via
> rte_eth_dev_stashing_{rx,tx}_config_set() ethdev library functions. Both
> functions have an identical signature, a port_id, a queue_id, and a
> config object. The port_id and the queue_id are used to locate the
> device and the queue. The config object is of type struct
> rte_eth_stashing_config, which specifies the lcore_id and the
> cache_level, indicating where objects from this queue should be stashed.
> The 'objects' field in the config sets the types of objects the
> application wishes to stash based on the capabilities found earlier.
> Note that if the 'objects' field includes the flag
> RTE_ETH_DEV_STASH_OBJECT_OFFSET, the 'offset' field must be used to set
> the desired offset. These functions invoke PMD implementations of the
> stashing functionality via the stashing_{rx,tx}_hints_set function
> callbacks in the eth_dev_ops, respectively.
> 
> The PMD's implementation of the stashing_rx_hints_set() and
> stashing_tx_hints_set() functions is ultimately responsible for
> extracting the ST via the API provided by the PCI bus driver. Before
> extracting STs, the PMD should enable the TPH capability in the endpoint
> device by calling the rte_pci_tph_enable() function.  The application
> begins the ST extraction process by calling the rte_pci_tph_st_get()
> function in drivers/bus/pci/rte_bus_pci.h, which returns STs via the
> same rte_tph_info objects array passed into it as an argument.  Once PMD
> acquires ST, the stashing_{rx,tx}_hints_set callbacks implemented in the
> PMD are ready to set the ST as per the rte_eth_stashing_config object
> passed to them by the higher-level ethdev functions
> ret_eth_dev_stashing_{rx,tx}_hints(). As per the PCIe specification, STs
> can be placed on the MSI-X tables or in a device-specific location. For
> PMDs, setting the STs on queue contexts is the only viable way of using
> TPH. Therefore, the PMDs should only enable TPH in device-specific mode.
> 
> V4->V5:
>  * Enable stashing-hints (TPH) in Intel i40e driver.
>  * Update exported symbol version from 25.03 to 25.07.
>  * Add TPH mode macros.
> 
> V3->V4:
>  * Add VFIO IOCTL based ST extraction mechanism to Linux PCI bus driver
>  * Remove ST extraction via direct access to ACPI _DSM
>  * Replace rte_pci_extract_tph_st() with rte_pci_tph_st_get() in PCI
>    bus driver.
> 
> Wathsala Vithanage (4):
>   pci: add non-merged Linux uAPI changes
>   bus/pci: introduce the PCIe TLP Processing Hints API
>   ethdev: introduce the cache stashing hints API
>   net/i40e: enable TPH in i40e
> 
>  drivers/bus/pci/bsd/pci.c            |  43 +++++++
>  drivers/bus/pci/bus_pci_driver.h     |  52 ++++++++
>  drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c          | 100 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_init.h     |  14 +++
>  drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c     | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/bus/pci/private.h            |   8 ++
>  drivers/bus/pci/rte_bus_pci.h        |  67 +++++++++++
>  drivers/bus/pci/windows/pci.c        |  43 +++++++
>  drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/linux/uapi/linux/vfio_tph.h   | 102 ++++++++++++++++
>  lib/ethdev/ethdev_driver.h           |  66 +++++++++++
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c              | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h              | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  lib/pci/rte_pci.h                    |  15 +++
>  14 files changed, 1114 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 kernel/linux/uapi/linux/vfio_tph.h
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-08  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-15 22:11 [RFC v2] ethdev: an API for cache stashing hints Wathsala Vithanage
2024-07-17  2:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-18 18:48   ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-20  3:05   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-07-17 10:32 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-07-22 11:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-26 20:01   ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-09-22 21:43     ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-10-04 17:52       ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-04 18:46         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-21  1:52 ` [RFC v3 0/2] An API for Stashing Packets into CPU caches Wathsala Vithanage
2024-10-21  1:52   ` [RFC v3 1/2] pci: introduce the PCIe TLP Processing Hints API Wathsala Vithanage
2024-12-03 20:54     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-21  1:52   ` [RFC v3 2/2] ethdev: introduce the cache stashing hints API Wathsala Vithanage
2024-10-21  7:36     ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-24  5:49     ` Jerin Jacob
2024-10-24  6:59       ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-24 15:12         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-24 15:04       ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-12-03 21:13     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-05 15:40       ` David Marchand
2024-12-05 21:00         ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-21  7:35   ` [RFC v3 0/2] An API for Stashing Packets into CPU caches Chenbo Xia
2024-10-21 12:01     ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-22  1:12   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-22 18:37     ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-22 21:23       ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-05-17 15:17   ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] " Wathsala Vithanage
2025-05-17 15:17     ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] pci: add non-merged Linux uAPI changes Wathsala Vithanage
2025-05-19  6:41       ` David Marchand
2025-05-19 17:55         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-05-17 15:17     ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] bus/pci: introduce the PCIe TLP Processing Hints API Wathsala Vithanage
2025-05-19  6:44       ` David Marchand
2025-05-19 17:57         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-05-17 15:17     ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] ethdev: introduce the cache stashing hints API Wathsala Vithanage
2025-05-20 13:53       ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-02 22:38   ` [PATCH v5 0/4] An API for Cache Stashing with TPH Wathsala Vithanage
2025-06-02 22:38     ` [PATCH v5 1/4] pci: add non-merged Linux uAPI changes Wathsala Vithanage
2025-06-02 23:11       ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-06-02 23:16         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-06-04 20:43       ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-02 22:38     ` [PATCH v5 2/4] bus/pci: introduce the PCIe TLP Processing Hints API Wathsala Vithanage
2025-06-03  8:11       ` Morten Brørup
2025-06-04 16:54       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-06-04 22:52         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-06-05  7:50           ` Bruce Richardson
2025-06-05 14:32             ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-06-05 10:18           ` Bruce Richardson
2025-06-05 14:25             ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-06-05 10:30       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-06-02 22:38     ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ethdev: introduce the cache stashing hints API Wathsala Vithanage
2025-06-03  8:43       ` Morten Brørup
2025-06-05 10:03       ` Bruce Richardson
2025-06-05 14:30         ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2025-06-02 22:38     ` [PATCH v5 4/4] net/i40e: enable TPH in i40e Wathsala Vithanage
2025-06-04 16:51     ` [PATCH v5 0/4] An API for Cache Stashing with TPH Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-04 22:24       ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2026-01-08  0:30     ` fengchengwen [this message]
2024-10-23 17:59 ` [RFC v2] ethdev: an API for cache stashing hints Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-23 20:18   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-24 14:59   ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-10-25  7:43   ` Andrew Rybchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b0f9515-7088-4251-91dc-2b6c858e582b@huawei.com \
    --to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).