From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] net/ice: use the common Rx queue structure
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 13:16:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e018253-521b-4ba9-b03f-586915b401cd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCTLW9HoAXOPd6Sg@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 5/14/2025 6:56 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 01:54:31PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>> Make the ice driver use the new common Rx queue structure.
>>
>> Because the ice driver supports both 16-byte and 32-byte descriptor
>> formats (controlled by RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC define), the common
>> queue structure has to take that into account, so the ring queue
>> structure will have both, while the actual descriptor format is picked by
>> ice at compile time using the above macro. Direct usage of Rx queue
>> structure is now meant to be replaced with a macro access that takes
>> descriptor size into account.
>
> I'd have the same comment as on the previous patch. I think it would be
> better to not have to use a macro at each reference, but have the struct
> type aliased as is done now.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> v2:
>> - Make xtr_field_offs of type ptrdiff_t instead of off_t to fix 32-bit compile
>> issues
>>
>> drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h | 23 +++
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_dcf.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_dcf_ethdev.c | 22 +--
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_ethdev.h | 5 +-
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.c | 158 ++++++++++----------
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx.h | 78 ++--------
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx_common_avx.h | 6 +-
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 14 +-
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx512.c | 16 +-
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_common.h | 6 +-
>> drivers/net/intel/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 22 +--
>> 12 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 194 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
>> index db49db57d0..9a691971bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> #ifndef _COMMON_INTEL_RX_H_
>> #define _COMMON_INTEL_RX_H_
>>
>> +#include <stddef.h>
>> #include <stdint.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>> #include <rte_mbuf.h>
>> @@ -12,6 +13,7 @@
>>
>> #define CI_RX_BURST 32
>> #define CI_RX_MAX_BURST 32
>> +#define CI_RX_MAX_NSEG 2
>>
>> struct ci_rx_queue;
>>
>> @@ -23,6 +25,8 @@ struct ci_rx_entry_sc {
>> struct rte_mbuf *fbuf; /* First segment of the fragmented packet.*/
>> };
>>
>> +typedef void (*ci_rx_release_mbufs_t)(struct ci_rx_queue *rxq);
>> +
>> /**
>> * Structure associated with each RX queue.
>> */
>> @@ -32,6 +36,8 @@ struct ci_rx_queue {
>> volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *ixgbe_rx_ring;
>> volatile union i40e_16byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_16b_ring;
>> volatile union i40e_32byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_32b_ring;
>> + volatile union ice_16b_rx_flex_desc *ice_rx_16b_ring;
>> + volatile union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *ice_rx_32b_ring;
>> };
>> volatile uint8_t *qrx_tail; /**< register address of tail */
>> struct ci_rx_entry *sw_ring; /**< address of RX software ring. */
>> @@ -64,10 +70,16 @@ struct ci_rx_queue {
>> bool drop_en; /**< if 1, drop packets if no descriptors are available. */
>> uint64_t mbuf_initializer; /**< value to init mbufs */
>> uint64_t offloads; /**< Rx offloads with RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_* */
>> + uint32_t rxdid; /**< RX descriptor format ID. */
>> + uint32_t proto_xtr; /* protocol extraction type */
>> + uint64_t xtr_ol_flag; /* flexible descriptor metadata extraction offload flag */
>> + ptrdiff_t xtr_field_offs; /* Protocol extraction matedata offset*/
>> + uint64_t hw_time_update; /**< Last time HW timestamp was updated */
>
> Just to confirm - these are not in the ice-specific section because they
> are also used by iavf?
Yes, it is for that reason. Any fields moved to common parts are present
in multiple drivers. There will be some instances where driver specific
fields do the same things slightly differently (prime example is
timestamping support), this can be future work.
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-23 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 13:27 [PATCH v1 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:39 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:09 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-23 11:16 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:59 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:11 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:57 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:58 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 11:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Bruce Richardson
2025-05-14 16:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:58 ` Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e018253-521b-4ba9-b03f-586915b401cd@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).