From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, stephen@networkplumber.org,
olivier.matz@6wind.com, jerinjacobk@gmail.com,
maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
arybchenko@solarflare.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:19:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1da2f4-074d-9d03-c44f-435498eedaa6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1602834519-8696-2-git-send-email-viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
On 10/16/2020 8:48 AM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> The DPDK datapath in the transmit direction is very flexible.
> An application can build the multi-segment packet and manages
> almost all data aspects - the memory pools where segments
> are allocated from, the segment lengths, the memory attributes
> like external buffers, registered for DMA, etc.
>
> In the receiving direction, the datapath is much less flexible,
> an application can only specify the memory pool to configure the
> receiving queue and nothing more. In order to extend receiving
> datapath capabilities it is proposed to add the way to provide
> extended information how to split the packets being received.
>
> The new offload flag RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT in device
> capabilities is introduced to present the way for PMD to report to
> application about supporting Rx packet split to configurable
> segments. Prior invoking the rte_eth_rx_queue_setup() routine
> application should check RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT flag.
>
> The following structure is introduced to specify the Rx packet
> segment for RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT offload:
>
> struct rte_eth_rxseg_split {
>
> struct rte_mempool *mp; /* memory pools to allocate segment from */
> uint16_t length; /* segment maximal data length,
> configures "split point" */
> uint16_t offset; /* data offset from beginning
> of mbuf data buffer */
> uint32_t reserved; /* reserved field */
> };
>
> The segment descriptions are added to the rte_eth_rxconf structure:
> rx_seg - pointer the array of segment descriptions, each element
> describes the memory pool, maximal data length, initial
> data offset from the beginning of data buffer in mbuf.
> This array allows to specify the different settings for
> each segment in individual fashion.
> rx_nseg - number of elements in the array
>
> If the extended segment descriptions is provided with these new
> fields the mp parameter of the rte_eth_rx_queue_setup must be
> specified as NULL to avoid ambiguity.
>
> There are two options to specify Rx buffer configuration:
> - mp is not NULL, rx_conf.rx_seg is NULL, rx_conf.rx_nseg is zero,
> it is compatible configuration, follows existing implementation,
> provides single pool and no description for segment sizes
> and offsets.
> - mp is NULL, rx_conf.rx_seg is not NULL, rx_conf.rx_nseg is not
> zero, it provides the extended configuration, individually for
> each segment.
>
> f the Rx queue is configured with new settings the packets being
> received will be split into multiple segments pushed to the mbufs
> with specified attributes. The PMD will split the received packets
> into multiple segments according to the specification in the
> description array.
>
> For example, let's suppose we configured the Rx queue with the
> following segments:
> seg0 - pool0, len0=14B, off0=2
> seg1 - pool1, len1=20B, off1=128B
> seg2 - pool2, len2=20B, off2=0B
> seg3 - pool3, len3=512B, off3=0B
>
> The packet 46 bytes long will look like the following:
> seg0 - 14B long @ RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + 2 in mbuf from pool0
> seg1 - 20B long @ 128 in mbuf from pool1
> seg2 - 12B long @ 0 in mbuf from pool2
>
> The packet 1500 bytes long will look like the following:
> seg0 - 14B @ RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM + 2 in mbuf from pool0
> seg1 - 20B @ 128 in mbuf from pool1
> seg2 - 20B @ 0 in mbuf from pool2
> seg3 - 512B @ 0 in mbuf from pool3
> seg4 - 512B @ 0 in mbuf from pool3
> seg5 - 422B @ 0 in mbuf from pool3
>
> The offload RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER must be present and
> configured to support new buffer split feature (if rx_nseg
> is greater than one).
>
> The split limitations imposed by underlying PMD is reported
> in the new introduced rte_eth_dev_info->rx_seg_capa field.
>
> The new approach would allow splitting the ingress packets into
> multiple parts pushed to the memory with different attributes.
> For example, the packet headers can be pushed to the embedded
> data buffers within mbufs and the application data into
> the external buffers attached to mbufs allocated from the
> different memory pools. The memory attributes for the split
> parts may differ either - for example the application data
> may be pushed into the external memory located on the dedicated
> physical device, say GPU or NVMe. This would improve the DPDK
> receiving datapath flexibility with preserving compatibility
> with existing API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
<...>
> +/**
> * A structure used to configure an RX ring of an Ethernet port.
> */
> struct rte_eth_rxconf {
> @@ -977,6 +998,46 @@ struct rte_eth_rxconf {
> uint16_t rx_free_thresh; /**< Drives the freeing of RX descriptors. */
> uint8_t rx_drop_en; /**< Drop packets if no descriptors are available. */
> uint8_t rx_deferred_start; /**< Do not start queue with rte_eth_dev_start(). */
> + uint16_t rx_nseg; /**< Number of descriptions in rx_seg array. */
> + /**
> + * Points to the array of segment descriptions. Each array element
> + * describes the properties for each segment in the receiving
> + * buffer according to feature descripting structure.
> + *
> + * The supported capabilities of receiving segmentation is reported
> + * in rte_eth_dev_info ->rx_seg_capa field.
> + *
> + * If RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_BUFFER_SPLIT flag is set in offloads field,
> + * the PMD will split the received packets into multiple segments
> + * according to the specification in the description array:
> + *
> + * - the first network buffer will be allocated from the memory pool,
> + * specified in the first array element, the second buffer, from the
> + * pool in the second element, and so on.
> + *
> + * - the offsets from the segment description elements specify
> + * the data offset from the buffer beginning except the first mbuf.
> + * For this one the offset is added with RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM.
> + *
> + * - the lengths in the elements define the maximal data amount
> + * being received to each segment. The receiving starts with filling
> + * up the first mbuf data buffer up to specified length. If the
> + * there are data remaining (packet is longer than buffer in the first
> + * mbuf) the following data will be pushed to the next segment
> + * up to its own length, and so on.
> + *
> + * - If the length in the segment description element is zero
> + * the actual buffer size will be deduced from the appropriate
> + * memory pool properties.
> + *
> + * - if there is not enough elements to describe the buffer for entire
> + * packet of maximal length the following parameters will be used
> + * for the all remaining segments:
> + * - pool from the last valid element
> + * - the buffer size from this pool
> + * - zero offset
> + */
> + struct rte_eth_rxseg *rx_seg;
"struct rte_eth_rxconf" is very commonly used, I think all applications does the
'rte_eth_rx_queue_setup()', but "buffer split" is not a common usage,
I am against the "struct rte_eth_rxseg *rx_seg;" field creating this much noise
in the "struct rte_eth_rxconf" documentation.
As mentioned before, can you please move the above detailed documentation to
where "struct rte_eth_rxseg" defined, and in this struct put a single comment
for "struct rte_eth_rxseg *rx_seg" ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-16 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 172+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 17:49 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Slava Ovsiienko
2020-09-17 16:55 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-01 8:54 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 8:45 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12 9:56 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 15:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 15:28 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-12 15:34 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 15:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-10-12 15:59 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 16:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12 16:10 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 21:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-14 7:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-14 7:37 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-05 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-05 6:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/9] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-11 22:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 9:40 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 10:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/9] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/9] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/9] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/9] net/mlx5: add extended Rx queue setup routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/9] net/mlx5: configure Rx queue to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/9] net/mlx5: register multiple pool for Rx queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-07 15:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 9/9] net/mlx5: update Rx datapath to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/9] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:38 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12 17:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 17:11 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-12 20:22 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 17:11 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/9] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/9] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/9] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/9] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/9] net/mlx5: add extended Rx queue setup routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/9] net/mlx5: configure Rx queue to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/9] net/mlx5: register multiple pool for Rx queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 16:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 9/9] net/mlx5: update Rx datapath to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/9] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/9] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/9] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/9] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/9] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/9] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/9] net/mlx5: add extended Rx queue setup routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/9] net/mlx5: configure Rx queue to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/9] net/mlx5: register multiple pool for Rx queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-12 20:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 9/9] net/mlx5: update Rx datapath to support split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 22:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-14 13:31 ` Olivier Matz
2020-10-14 14:42 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-13 19:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:57 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 7:43 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 9:27 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 10:27 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 10:51 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 11:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 11:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-15 11:49 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 12:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-15 13:07 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 13:57 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:22 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 9:49 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 10:34 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 11:09 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 14:39 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 22:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-14 22:50 ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-15 10:11 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-15 10:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-14 18:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-14 18:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 0:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal/rte_malloc: add alloc_size() attribute to allocation functions Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-19 14:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-19 14:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:30 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-10-15 20:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-15 22:01 ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-15 20:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 8:51 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16 8:58 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16 9:15 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 9:27 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16 9:34 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 9:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-16 9:38 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 9:19 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-10-16 9:21 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-10-16 9:22 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 7:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 11:21 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 13:08 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 12:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-16 16:18 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 16:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-16 16:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 15:38 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 15:48 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 15:55 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 15:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 13:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 1/6] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 19:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 21:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 2/6] app/testpmd: add multiple pools per core creation Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 3/6] app/testpmd: add buffer split offload configuration Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 4/6] app/testpmd: add rxpkts commands and parameters Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 5/6] app/testpmd: add rxoffs " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 16:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 6/6] app/testpmd: add extended Rx queue setup Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-10-16 17:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] ethdev: introduce Rx buffer split Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-16 17:07 ` Slava Ovsiienko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e1da2f4-074d-9d03-c44f-435498eedaa6@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).