Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/8] bpf: introduce basic RX/TX BPF filters

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 5/4/2018 1:45 PM, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> +/**
> + * Load BPF program from the ELF file and install callback to execute it
> + * on given RX port/queue.
> + *
> + * @param port
> + *   The identifier of the ethernet port
> + * @param queue
> + *   The identifier of the RX queue on the given port
> + * @param fname
> + *  Pathname for a ELF file.
> + * @param sname
> + *  Name of the executable section within the file to load.
> + * @return
> + *   Zero on successful completion or negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int rte_bpf_eth_rx_elf_load(uint16_t port, uint16_t queue,
> +	const struct rte_bpf_prm *prm, const char *fname, const char *sname,
> +	uint32_t flags);
> +
> +/**
> + * Load BPF program from the ELF file and install callback to execute it
> + * on given TX port/queue.
> + *
> + * @param port
> + *   The identifier of the ethernet port
> + * @param queue
> + *   The identifier of the TX queue on the given port
> + * @param fname
> + *  Pathname for a ELF file.
> + * @param sname
> + *  Name of the executable section within the file to load.
> + * @return
> + *   Zero on successful completion or negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int rte_bpf_eth_tx_elf_load(uint16_t port, uint16_t queue,
> +	const struct rte_bpf_prm *prm, const char *fname, const char *sname,
> +	uint32_t flags);

Doxygen is complaining about documented params for both functions, prm & flags
are missing.