DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Malov <Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru>
To: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to flow API
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 16:30:04 +0300
Message-ID: <3f3cf1b1-c3a4-9408-52ef-fcd4bcf99f7e@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR12MB5400572EDCD3122F1EB743A3D6B49@DM8PR12MB5400.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Ori,

Thanks a lot for reviewing this.

On 10/10/2021 14:15, Ori Kam wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
> 
>>From the new patches I saw you choose port_representor and represented_port
> Didn't we agree to go with ETHDEV_PORT and SHADOW_PORT?

Yes, in the previous thread I suggested a different option. But
I gave it more thought and decided to go for PORT_REPRESENTOR
and REPRESENTED_PORT instead. In any case, I apologise for it
being such short notice.

> The only thing that worries me is that the naming are very easy to get wrong.
> port_representor and represented_port.

Is that so? In "port representor", the key word is "representor", a
noun. In "represented port", the key word is "port". Word "represented"
acts like an adjective. More to that, the order of words is chosen on
purpose to prevent someone from accidentally writing "representOR_port"
in their code, for example. That simply won't compile.

Well, at least, these two are harder to get wrong compared to "employer"
and "employee", for example.

The new names are better because they are paired terms. Each one
suggests the existence of the other one. This spares one from the
need to have wordy explanations of the symmetry of the diagram.
The new names speak themselves.

Saying "shadow" is in fact vague. The reader doesn't see clearly
that it's the shadow of the ethdev. And, in turn, "ethdev" is also
not as good as "representor". It's even hard to pronounce because
of being a combination of multiple contractions.

I hope you get the idea.

> 
> Also there is an issue with wording if we assume like in previous thread that
> DPDK can have both the representor port and also the represented_port.
> While if we look at for example ethdev_port and shadow port are better defined
> as ethdev_port -> the port that is closest to the DPDK ethdev while shadow port
> is defined as the other side of the ethdev port.
> 
> What do you think?

The semantics hasn't changed since the previous thread.
Representor coincides with the ethdev, so it's still the closest port.
And represented port is still the other side. It's all the same in fact.

If both VF and its representor are plugged to DPDK, they represent each
other in fact. Mutual representors. You can equally name the first one
a representor and the other one a represented port, - and vice versa.

The new naming doesn't deny both these ports being ethdevs, while
the previous option (ethdev and shadow) may trick the reader into
thinking that only one of the two can be an ethdev. The reader may
think that this use case (when VF and its representor are plugged to
the application) is completely wrong. Let's avoid this mistake.

> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2021 3:05 AM
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to flow API
>> ?
>> For use in "transfer" flows. Supposed to match traffic entering the embedded
>> switch from the given ethdev.
> 
> 
> I would also add a comment that says the since we are in transfer it means
> that all rules are located in the E-Switch which means that the matching is done
> on the source port of the traffic.

Let me put it clear: I don't mind adding more comments. I can do that,
yes. But look. You say "matching is done on the source port". Isn't that
what "entering the embedded switch FROM the given ethdev" already says?

> 
> I think this will also help understand the view point that we are looking from the point
> of the switch, and to add the drawing.

Well, as I said, technically, I don't object adding more comments. But
the above description says: "entering the embedded switch". Doesn't it
indicate the viewpoint clear enough? Should I reword this?

Also, "flow engine" is showed in the diagram. And there are arrows.
Doesn't that explain the viewpoint fully?

I'm ready to discuss / improve.

> 
>>
>> Must not be combined with direction attributes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>   app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c                 | 27 ++++++++++
>>   doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst          | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst      |  2 +
>>   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst |  4 ++
>>   lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c                       |  1 +
>>   lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h                       | 27 ++++++++++
>>   6 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c index
>> bb22294dd3..a912a8d815 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
>> @@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ enum index {
>>   	ITEM_POL_PORT,
>>   	ITEM_POL_METER,
>>   	ITEM_POL_POLICY,
>> +	ITEM_PORT_REPRESENTOR,
>> +	ITEM_PORT_REPRESENTOR_PORT_ID,
>>
>>   	/* Validate/create actions. */
>>   	ACTIONS,
>> @@ -1000,6 +1002,7 @@ static const enum index next_item[] = {
>>   	ITEM_GENEVE_OPT,
>>   	ITEM_INTEGRITY,
>>   	ITEM_CONNTRACK,
>> +	ITEM_PORT_REPRESENTOR,
>>   	END_SET,
>>   	ZERO,
>>   };
>> @@ -1368,6 +1371,12 @@ static const enum index item_integrity_lv[] = {
>>   	ZERO,
>>   };
>>
>> +static const enum index item_port_representor[] = {
>> +	ITEM_PORT_REPRESENTOR_PORT_ID,
>> +	ITEM_NEXT,
>> +	ZERO,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const enum index next_action[] = {
>>   	ACTION_END,
>>   	ACTION_VOID,
>> @@ -3608,6 +3617,21 @@ static const struct token token_list[] = {
>>   			     item_param),
>>   		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_conntrack,
>> flags)),
>>   	},
>> +	[ITEM_PORT_REPRESENTOR] = {
>> +		.name = "port_representor",
>> +		.help = "match traffic entering the embedded switch from the
>> given ethdev",
>> +		.priv = PRIV_ITEM(PORT_REPRESENTOR,
>> +				  sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ethdev)),
>> +		.next = NEXT(item_port_representor),
>> +		.call = parse_vc,
>> +	},
>> +	[ITEM_PORT_REPRESENTOR_PORT_ID] = {
>> +		.name = "port_id",
>> +		.help = "ethdev port ID",
>> +		.next = NEXT(item_port_representor,
>> NEXT_ENTRY(COMMON_UNSIGNED),
>> +			     item_param),
>> +		.args = ARGS(ARGS_ENTRY(struct rte_flow_item_ethdev,
>> port_id)),
>> +	},
>>   	/* Validate/create actions. */
>>   	[ACTIONS] = {
>>   		.name = "actions",
>> @@ -8343,6 +8367,9 @@ flow_item_default_mask(const struct rte_flow_item
>> *item)
>>   	case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PFCP:
>>   		mask = &rte_flow_item_pfcp_mask;
>>   		break;
>> +	case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PORT_REPRESENTOR:
>> +		mask = &rte_flow_item_ethdev_mask;
>> +		break;
>>   	default:
>>   		break;
>>   	}
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
>> b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
>> index 2b42d5ec8c..2e0f590777 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
>> @@ -1425,6 +1425,65 @@ Matches a conntrack state after conntrack action.
>>   - ``flags``: conntrack packet state flags.
>>   - Default ``mask`` matches all state bits.
>>
>> +Item: ``PORT_REPRESENTOR``
>> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> +
>> +Matches traffic entering the embedded switch from the given ethdev.
>> +
>> +Term **ethdev** and the concept of **port representor** are synonymous.
>> +The **represented port** is an *entity* plugged to the embedded switch
>> +at the opposite end of the "wire" leading to the ethdev.
>> +
>> +::
>> +
>> +    .------------------------.
>> +    |    PORT_REPRESENTOR    |  Ethdev (Application Port Referred to by its ID)
>> +    '------------------------'
>> +                ||
>> +                \/
>> +    .------------------------.
>> +    |  Embedded Switch Port  |  Logical Port
>> +    '------------------------'
>> +                ||
>> +                ||
>> +                ||
>> +                \/
>> +    .------------------------.
>> +    |  Embedded Flow Engine  |
>> +    '------------------------'
>> +                :
>> +                 :
>> +                :
>> +                 :
>> +    .------------------------.
>> +    |  Embedded Switch Port  |  Logical Port
>> +    '------------------------'
>> +                :
>> +                 :
>> +    .------------------------.
>> +    |    REPRESENTED_PORT    |  Net / Guest / Another Ethdev (Same
>> Application)
>> +    '------------------------'
>> +
>> +
> 
> I think this drawing is harder to understand than the one
> you draw in the previous thread (A-> ethdev, b-> embedded switch, switch , c-> embedded switch, d -> represented entity (shadow port).

Is that so? Here's the previous drawing:


      [ A ]       <-- ethdev
        |
      [ B ]       <-- embedded switch (logical) port
        |
        |
        |
===============  <-- plane of symmetry
        |
        |
        |
      [ C ]       <-- embedded switch (logical) port
        |
      [ D ]       <-- represented entity


Technically, these two are exactly the same. Yes, I use precise names
instead of letters (A, B, C, D) and more formatting, but that should
help, not confuse.

And, as I say, in the new one, I don't have to use complex terms
like "plane of symmetry". The names speak for it themselves.

> 
>> +- Incompatibe with `Attribute: Traffic direction`_.
>> +- Requires `Attribute: Transfer`_.
>> +
>> +.. _table_rte_flow_item_ethdev:
>> +
>> +.. table:: ``struct rte_flow_item_ethdev``
>> +
>> +   +----------+-------------+---------------------------+
>> +   | Field    | Subfield    | Value                     |
>> +   +==========+=============+===========================+
>> +   | ``spec`` | ``port_id`` | ethdev port ID            |
>> +   +----------+-------------+---------------------------+
>> +   | ``last`` | ``port_id`` | upper range value         |
>> +   +----------+-------------+---------------------------+
>> +   | ``mask`` | ``port_id`` | zeroed for wildcard match |
>> +   +----------+-------------+---------------------------+
>> +
>> +- Default ``mask`` provides exact match behaviour.
>> +
>>   Actions
>>   ~~~~~~~
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
>> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
>> index 89d4b33ef1..1261cb2bf3 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
>> @@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ API Changes
>>      Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
>>      =======================================================
>>
>> +* ethdev: Added item ``PORT_REPRESENTOR`` to flow API.
>> +
>>   * kvargs: The experimental function ``rte_kvargs_strcmp()`` has been
>>     removed. Its usages have been replaced by a new function
>>     ``rte_kvargs_get_with_value()``.
>> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>> index 8ead7a4a71..dcb9f47d98 100644
>> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
>> @@ -3795,6 +3795,10 @@ This section lists supported pattern items and their
>> attributes, if any.
>>
>>   - ``conntrack``: match conntrack state.
>>
>> +- ``port_representor``: match traffic entering the embedded switch from
>> +the given ethdev
>> +
>> +  - ``port_id {unsigned}``: ethdev port ID
>> +
>>   Actions list
>>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c index
>> 8cb7a069c8..5e9317c6d1 100644
>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
>> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static const struct rte_flow_desc_data
>> rte_flow_desc_item[] = {
>>   	MK_FLOW_ITEM(GENEVE_OPT, sizeof(struct
>> rte_flow_item_geneve_opt)),
>>   	MK_FLOW_ITEM(INTEGRITY, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_integrity)),
>>   	MK_FLOW_ITEM(CONNTRACK, sizeof(uint32_t)),
>> +	MK_FLOW_ITEM(PORT_REPRESENTOR, sizeof(struct
>> rte_flow_item_ethdev)),
>>   };
>>
>>   /** Generate flow_action[] entry. */
>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h index
>> 7b1ed7f110..3625fd2c12 100644
>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
>> @@ -574,6 +574,15 @@ enum rte_flow_item_type {
>>   	 * @see struct rte_flow_item_conntrack.
>>   	 */
>>   	RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_CONNTRACK,
>> +
>> +	/**
>> +	 * [META]
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Matches traffic entering the embedded switch from the given ethdev.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * @see struct rte_flow_item_ethdev
>> +	 */
>> +	RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PORT_REPRESENTOR,
>>   };
>>
>>   /**
>> @@ -1799,6 +1808,24 @@ static const struct rte_flow_item_conntrack
>> rte_flow_item_conntrack_mask = {  };  #endif
>>
>> +/**
>> + * @warning
>> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior notice
>> + *
>> + * Provides an ethdev port ID for use with the following items:
>> + * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PORT_REPRESENTOR.
>> + */
>> +struct rte_flow_item_ethdev {
>> +	uint16_t port_id; /**< ethdev port ID */ };
>> +
>> +/** Default mask for items based on struct rte_flow_item_ethdev */
>> +#ifndef __cplusplus static const struct rte_flow_item_ethdev
>> +rte_flow_item_ethdev_mask = {
>> +	.port_id = 0xffff,
>> +};
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * Matching pattern item definition.
>>    *
>> --
>> 2.20.1

-- 
Ivan M

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-10 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 155+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-07 12:51 [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: clarify flow attribute and action port ID semantics Ivan Malov
2021-10-01 13:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 01/12] ethdev: add ethdev item to " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-03 11:52     ` Ori Kam
2021-10-03 17:40       ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-03 21:09         ` Ori Kam
2021-10-04  0:00           ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-04 10:47             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-04 11:08               ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 02/12] ethdev: add eswitch port " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-03 12:40     ` Ori Kam
2021-10-03 18:10       ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-04  5:45         ` Ori Kam
2021-10-04 11:05           ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-04 11:37             ` Ori Kam
2021-10-04 11:58               ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-05  6:20                 ` Ori Kam
2021-10-05  9:19                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-05 12:12                     ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 03/12] ethdev: add ethdev action " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 04/12] ethdev: add eswitch port " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 05/12] ethdev: deprecate hard-to-use or ambiguous items and actions Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 06/12] ethdev: deprecate direction attributes in transfer flows Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 07/12] net/bnxt: support ethdev and E-Switch port flow items Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 08/12] net/bnxt: support ethdev and E-Switch port flow actions Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 09/12] net/enic: " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 10/12] net/mlx5: support E-Switch port flow action Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 11/12] net/octeontx2: support ethdev " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-04 11:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
2021-10-04 12:45       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-01 13:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 12/12] net/sfc: support ethdev flow item Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-10  0:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to " Ivan Malov
2021-10-10 11:15       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-10 13:30         ` Ivan Malov [this message]
2021-10-10 14:04           ` Ori Kam
2021-10-10 15:02             ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/12] ethdev: add port representor action " Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/12] ethdev: deprecate hard-to-use or ambiguous items and actions Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/12] ethdev: deprecate direction attributes in transfer flows Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow items to match on traffic source Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:04     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow actions to overrule destinations Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/12] net/enic: " Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/12] net/mlx5: support represented port flow action Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 11/12] net/octeontx2: support port representor " Ivan Malov
2021-10-10  0:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/12] net/sfc: support port representor flow item Ivan Malov
2021-10-10 14:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Ivan Malov
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to " Ivan Malov
2021-10-11 11:49       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-12 12:39         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-12 20:55       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-10-12 23:14         ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 18:26           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-10-13 11:52       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-11 11:51       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-12 12:39         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/12] ethdev: add port representor action " Ivan Malov
2021-10-11 18:18       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-12 12:39         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-11 18:20       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-12 12:40         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/12] ethdev: deprecate hard-to-use or ambiguous items and actions Ivan Malov
2021-10-11 18:23       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-12 12:40         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-13 11:53       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/12] ethdev: deprecate direction attributes in transfer flows Ivan Malov
2021-10-11 18:33       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-12 12:40         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow items to match on traffic source Ivan Malov
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow actions to overrule destinations Ivan Malov
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/12] net/enic: " Ivan Malov
2021-10-12 17:03       ` Hyong Youb Kim (hyonkim)
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] net/mlx5: support represented port flow action Ivan Malov
2021-10-12 21:23       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/12] net/octeontx2: support port representor " Ivan Malov
2021-10-10 14:39     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 12/12] net/sfc: support port representor flow item Ivan Malov
2021-10-12 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-13 11:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-13 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/12] ethdev: add port representor action " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/12] ethdev: deprecate hard-to-use or ambiguous items and actions Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/12] ethdev: deprecate direction attributes in transfer flows Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow items to match on traffic source Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow actions to overrule destinations Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/12] net/enic: " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/12] net/mlx5: support represented port flow action Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/12] net/octeontx2: support port representor " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:42     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 12/12] net/sfc: support port representor flow item Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/12] ethdev: add port representor action " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/12] ethdev: deprecate hard-to-use or ambiguous items and actions Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/12] ethdev: deprecate direction attributes in transfer flows Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow items to match on traffic source Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow actions to overrule destinations Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/12] net/enic: " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/12] net/mlx5: support represented port flow action Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/12] net/octeontx2: support port representor " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 16:57     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 12/12] net/sfc: support port representor flow item Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:15       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/12] ethdev: add port representor action " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/12] ethdev: deprecate hard-to-use or ambiguous items and actions Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/12] ethdev: deprecate direction attributes in transfer flows Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow items to match on traffic source Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow actions to overrule destinations Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/12] net/enic: " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/12] net/mlx5: support represented port flow action Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 18:02       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/12] net/octeontx2: support port representor " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 12/12] net/sfc: support port representor flow item Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 01/12] ethdev: add port representor item to " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 03/12] ethdev: add port representor action " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 04/12] ethdev: add represented port " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 05/12] ethdev: deprecate hard-to-use or ambiguous items and actions Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 06/12] ethdev: deprecate direction attributes in transfer flows Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 18:48       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 07/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow items to match on traffic source Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 08/12] net/bnxt: support meta flow actions to overrule destinations Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 09/12] net/enic: " Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 10/12] net/mlx5: support represented port flow action Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 11/12] net/octeontx2: support port representor " Ivan Malov
2021-10-20  2:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
2021-10-13 17:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 12/12] net/sfc: support port representor flow item Ivan Malov
2021-10-13 21:08     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/12] ethdev: rework transfer flow API Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-05  0:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: let apps find transfer admin port for a given ethdev Ivan Malov
2021-10-05  9:22   ` Ori Kam
2021-10-05 12:41     ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-05 16:04       ` Ori Kam
2021-10-05 17:56   ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-05 18:22     ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-05 19:04       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-05 21:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: add API to query proxy port to manage transfer flows Ivan Malov
2021-10-06  7:47     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-10-06 12:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ivan Malov
2021-10-14  3:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Ivan Malov
2021-10-14 11:45     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-10-26 14:46     ` David Marchand
2021-10-26 15:47       ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-26 15:58         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-10-26 16:15           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f3cf1b1-c3a4-9408-52ef-fcd4bcf99f7e@oktetlabs.ru \
    --to=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git