From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCE4A04B5; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:55:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B3C140CD3; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:55:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E364140CCF for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:55:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177E02660; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:55:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:55:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= Br2TWzwhlI6PYB4SnEhxNUrY5wUDQWdVselIeziovg0=; b=pNhhOItGyku3BikR QDhSkmvc3h20UBw7aACrah0TA3KWF7Q1osTKx1W0yKtkeCM0xxRLYYxv/MZ0fbju S6GfB8OXzoi01n+AZskVqFsTN1JyHN5uhbIDxIsZ7HOP4a++iTrxH4BX9YYs+kje IrZHYSrI2LEtRab5CPVuvqeaH1mqCxibhGBGB7s+9CoTV2oFKOYxRQmTEG77+Kvo 2EqhCPZNEOKVp/fDW1vRbnjY/JE7sYer/7S5rROM/iqz2maa2iWHD8IMwSVnYuyX qpoCEfYFPbOLjnfdHk5j58qhHs9ytki1+DAJh2cvpnaIe4Q/Phhe5j9Ga4sj/p2+ lVmsrg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Br2TWzwhlI6PYB4SnEhxNUrY5wUDQWdVselIeziov g0=; b=GnIOCZdyDTlf4rqOWdIoJDEmYu6+6PRfqb/Ww9yVsfQN+N92SiiuReXxi IlVNTuNPjemP2opSg93/ar/BpX6eJbFlB6bWArZauGG/4x6q9KHgspp0H0poau3+ 6VYKlQ0pz9Lox01Yx6pAOI5mjGRl5A6MQ43o3oYtusFarXys4IjjAVI8A3IhE6qX +gBG9qpGL1Pkv9bePUd7If2X35E6h0W9FIcTvpnsNIA7gl7Y8FFr9k7IwzqPlNu3 oO4XoW1uf3T4blW9yIQ4NqTrGT304Xt8P18LPL2sfdOSFp9jYAwuvGc0xD21/taf TSCeKFtE/Z3Av/rbvQroKbrkUEpsQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdehtddgtdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeethedtieevhfeigeejleegudefjeehkeekteeuveeiuedvveeu tdejveehveetnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 586B3108005B; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:55:51 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ophir Munk Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Ori Kam , David Christensen Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:55:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4006782.2bIctDIqnZ@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20201216164931.1517-2-ophirmu@nvidia.com> <4985833.vo0Fgz2hKg@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] app/regex: support performance measurements per QP X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 10/01/2021 12:16, Ophir Munk: >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon > > Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 11:09 AM > > To: Ophir Munk > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] app/regex: support performance > > measurements per QP > >=20 > > 20/12/2020 11:41, Ophir Munk: > > > Up to this commit measuring the parsing elapsed time and Giga bits per > > > second performance was done on the aggregation of all QPs (per core). > > > This commit separates the time measurements per individual QP. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk > > > --- > > > --- a/app/test-regex/main.c > > > +++ b/app/test-regex/main.c > > > + for (qp_id =3D 0; qp_id < nb_qps; qp_id++) { > > > + time =3D ((double)qp->end - qp->start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC; > >=20 > > This line triggers an error with PPC compiler: > > error: =E2=80=98qp=E2=80=99 may be used uninitialized in this function = [-Werror=3Dmaybe- > > uninitialized] > > time =3D ((double)qp->end - qp->start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC; > >=20 > Thanks for reporting. > I sent v3 with a fix. > Could I have known this error in advance? Is there a CI report? No I think there is no CI report for PPC. Actually the PPC support in DPDK is not clear.