From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C44A0C43; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509184118F; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E1240687 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:22:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4715C01A9; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:22:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:22:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= chMngIwe0WGtXX5skwQyeb1rMDt/hLJQcMPc5vP2zSE=; b=moiIhcj4tsP7LuA1 d7eCwhO6rzx4OmP+uZlG6Y/d9IGyXhlkpmlq7oOPM6ew/txxAYIkBtXIFP9hGmRW yVCF0s/nWP0F+xmaFMAckuQLyfFHdQNlPjINx3OR4hN3f22w7Jk+eozNrgOaUiHU Xl3GWIpH9lRp4JluEK+lJQ4DK+IHiQFiQF/RY3YFuQ9TuJr0M1OZ1kJESFKLQZc0 n/4QwHrQDwkuFNYPT02N6p7GAaKBXevbQBriauEc0y7z0q130CfDGvp7kdridqUk CjHZiBXwmyUr5Zw9P4BkcYF6Biw0KK6w4JElgkKwtli6jK6zGwhyflNtpofZi2jQ uqMWUw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=chMngIwe0WGtXX5skwQyeb1rMDt/hLJQcMPc5vP2z SE=; b=IKJk5Fk81dZ2symeenvdS8dbAfx8QZYECPNQ3eWRtUgHdyllO9++isgm1 zxiXNBhscOmqLPTTcdJZbOpm4N8g/8mcm6EV8dnyImqCmwCB7eyvQtBsjMCXbhfW WyXpOYXxY71BxkE3e2A/oMA5n3LrS+C9WlxKBSSlp4nqCC50gP0ke4sHa5gMzg5b M14tf81rlIhEb9/VFa/n8uhoYYOLEHbkyTFfbDDd39P5GClyJ3c7NtCY4NyzWukA amME9oPFnrG1W9qzKy6XiJRtcEb4VXC7NDMTVSRNFOEAYTXAknyNPvPdkMYy5pz8 OnIUBQLcKTd0WUApo52TllVawe7yA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddvgedgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:21:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" , Gagandeep Singh , Hemant Agrawal , Akhil Goyal Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:21:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4018747.7GKOkI4Wxd@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20211013190032.2308-1-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <2095344.Sq1ZWAvLuo@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 14/15] test/crypto: add raw API test for dpaax X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/10/2021 11:15, Akhil Goyal: > > 17/10/2021 18:16, Hemant Agrawal: > > > This patch add support for raw API tests for > > > dpaa_sec and dpaa2_sec platforms. > > > > Why do we have tests specific to some drivers? > > Is there a plan to remove them? > > > > The testsuites are common and there is no driver specific test. > The test command is different for each of the PMD, > that is why it is registered for each PMD. > For Raw data path APIs, all of the testsuite is run with a global flag set. > Currently only 3 PMDs support raw APIs, we can get rid of this global flag in future if more > PMDs start supporting these APIs. No there is something wrong. It shows that it is not generic enough for any app. What is missing to make the same calls no matter the driver? Do we need to add some capability flags?