From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B94944103; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:51:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE184402C6; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:51:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wfhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh8-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.159]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753A0402C6 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 16:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED5318000E9; Wed, 29 May 2024 10:51:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 May 2024 10:51:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1716994300; x=1717080700; bh=nCApHxaEtjal+lvxf+Iv/o/xCWn7DYUug0QKFdLwRfI=; b= WEBGjixM82rKpC2pG4b6h3rU/05ccrO56SQb/q6EQrWrvOiTNgWIAYEwJI6gDPsf kXa6H9ulP7aZYQmFt8lKa/S7f8eK8Q+B+K1T0okToqiuOqmUwh15F8y2vDQhJn4s Myy5wgSn63qC6niPaWalH9sJy2hjCo82AeZ1q/Sy3XZGE/TnPT0Qauxr94LSgn/J gC6IDtL1fbYWfmoZtVvV/KJwlQjYvNDH76STfMtTfu1LDyo04SqOPK64ug7VMUP1 QC7uvarxEzYQvI6reOkXvV8SfYaUVezD3/le8VwzqGoOdsBPtmjimInoJExfq1en aboq/LoAXXYoKtb6F7NQwg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1716994300; x= 1717080700; bh=nCApHxaEtjal+lvxf+Iv/o/xCWn7DYUug0QKFdLwRfI=; b=E giVSp5LXEbdDNRzkW9MBxMa5OQX6VK/UIOi8yHtttp9CUXzJ05lDG+vyeeVJmWwI FM4NTpRcfXXSxz1XwKfCq++RtZGARj1b5gF8CvbY70SAyEICiqhHiNRoG8td3ORQ kTFtqD7QAxBWq6PyKPAhRLb4YdNg/8XDxAAC8Gz+GloWVx11ltdUtprqxhU2xiAg aM9aC4DSVRbEmr3c7jRE8FE8C139TnncXPMJZQxmbDeOrT38qn2GVn94/2I+/cba S5TEwKG/QB2W4eUUDkxeIOLja7O4ZqV9ed/tRXR7TGcRN4Ckjhp45be4dS3T3DHA HEIsSq0uHiq9WxnrJe9xg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdekuddgkedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejudevheeiveduuddtveffgfdtgeekueevjeffjeegtdeggeek gfdvuefgfeekjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 29 May 2024 10:51:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tyler Retzlaff Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Morten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= , Andrew Rybchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mempool: use rte constant macro instead of GCC builtin Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:51:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4023574.2iPT33SAM4@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1710970416-27841-3-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1710970416-27841-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> <1710970416-27841-3-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 20/03/2024 22:33, Tyler Retzlaff: > Use newly introduced __rte_constant(e) macro instead of directly using > __builtin_constant_p() allowing mempool to be built by MSVC. Does it mean we should enable mempool build? If yes, please send a v2.