From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Radha Mohan <mohun106@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Mahipal Challa <mchalla@marvell.com>,
Radha Chintakuntla <radhac@marvell.com>,
Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
Satananda Burla <sburla@marvell.com>,
david.marchand@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] maintainers: Update for OcteonTx2 DMA and EP
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:15:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4090240.s8fMJe6Fhk@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC8NTUU7p5JAoq0-EO_3fd0o5LARcs+RwkU+n7WJD3aHN7rKsg@mail.gmail.com>
18/11/2020 05:15, Radha Mohan:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:28 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > 16/11/2020 19:28, Radha Mohan:
> > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 2:39 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > > > 13/11/2020 20:18, Radha Mohan:
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:57 PM Mahipal Challa <mchalla@marvell.com> wrote:
> > > > > From: Radha Mohan <mohun106@gmail.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 11:44 PM
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 4:20 PM Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <radhac@marvell.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Replace the maintainers for OcteonTx2 DMA and EP drivers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <radhac@marvell.com>
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > >Adding previous maintainers to ack.
> > > > > > Acked-by: Mahipal Challa <mchalla@marvell.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Mahipal
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > > Could you please pick this patch ?
> > > >
> > > > This low-priority patch has been sent 4 days ago,
> > > > and was acked by only 1 maintainer 3 days ago.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It was acked by both the old maintainers Satha Koteshwar and Mahipal
> > > Challa. Maybe both of those emails didn't come on top of each other.
> >
> > I missed one.
> >
> > > > Why pushing? What is your fear exactly?
> > >
> > > Just want to make the transfer of ownership official in the mainline.
> > > There's no fear I just normally wanted to send a reminder to you to
> > > pick as it might be missed inclusion. If there's a guarantee that all
> > > ack'ed patches will go automatically then I won't be sending any
> > > reminder emails in future.
> >
> > It's OK to send reminder, but please wait at least a week.
> >
> > > > Why the new maintainers candidates have 0 and 2 contributions
> > > > in git history?
> > > >
> > > These drivers requires some maintenance and likely expanded to support
> > > future chips from Marvell. So you will not see contributions right
> > > away.
> > > So to become a maintainer one has to have prior contributions ?
> >
> > Yes: http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html#maintainers-and-sub-trees
> > "
> > Maintainers should have demonstrated a reasonable level of contributions or reviews to the component area. The maintainer should be confirmed by an ack from an established contributor.
> > "
>
> How was this done without prior contributions?
> http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/MAINTAINERS?id=238e3167ca869abf44fa50ead022d7fc3b99605b
I asked a confirmation:
http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/1985242.AXpOyGb66D@thomas/
> The commit log says that he is a "new developer". So am I technically
> to the community.
>
> Also the thing that puzzles me most is its a driver specific to
> Marvell and both the previous maintainers are ok with the transfer but
> a strange rule that probably applies to generic things of dpdk code
> (which really makes sense there) comes as a blocker.
Did I say it is a blocker?
> And how does new driver go?
For new drivers, the new maintainers arrive by contributing new code.
> Lets say if either myself or veerasena have pushed a new driver now
> who has to ack it for inclusion ? Isn't that like a chicken and egg
> problem.
Nobody has to ack for a new driver.
> I am looking for clarifications as things are different in other open
> source communities.
>
> > > Kind of makes odd sense as these drivers are specific to our chip and we
> > > are changing ownership for maintaining them.
> > > I do not understand why you have an issue here?
> > > You don't like reminding then I understand.
> >
> > I don't like how you push new unconfirmed maintainers.
>
> Could you please explain above commit made into new maintainer?
Listen: I say I don't like how pushy you are, that's all.
In general it's very good to have new contributors.
But please think how you can help instead of just requesting.
We have a lot more important things to care at the moment
to close the big release 20.11. If you want to help, you are welcome.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-18 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 0:19 [dpdk-dev] " Radha Mohan Chintakuntla
2020-11-10 18:13 ` Radha Mohan
2020-11-10 18:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Satha Koteswara Rao Kottidi
2020-11-11 7:56 ` Mahipal Challa
2020-11-13 19:18 ` Radha Mohan
2020-11-13 22:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-16 18:28 ` Radha Mohan
2020-11-16 20:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-11-18 4:15 ` Radha Mohan
2020-11-18 9:15 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-11-18 21:31 ` Radha Mohan
2020-11-22 11:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4090240.s8fMJe6Fhk@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=mchalla@marvell.com \
--cc=mohun106@gmail.com \
--cc=radhac@marvell.com \
--cc=sburla@marvell.com \
--cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
--cc=vburru@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).