From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4E0A0561; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 04:29:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588C41D691; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 04:29:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5501C1DE for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 04:29:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E0F5C01BD; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:29:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= jbAD9Ve42gSXM8mLHOaMNZMt53PMHNgXJ48F+IZfzTc=; b=mY2i8jPf0sDHVp9o 0C4lKmib0M/zHvvI8KUkk5w3wTWpHUtvyOowKZYzJo8Fn9BbmFAlpmWC4rgkB2Dv f8S03pEct8tNs8Xk2nehLUlzcGk9DP3BQJ58HZGQsljy8YCCfSlHaV3WCs9AQJvL ROKhJ0m9RPAFaZqBr2O4eRSnDQ9urncRGKwH5CoRD5nTYLZvhUF416ZIfmy+8qx6 6cusPRXZ6OMPgTHWP7LzgJ1dO3pfj2zDl1caHlMw4Zr8zuWfZtrAy1JoaxLq+UMD phQFu0UxzM2XpOHgsTy6GzO366X2+EKgnmHIk2q49RwNGCVBd4UNPZTExWl2Y59v +yU5YQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=jbAD9Ve42gSXM8mLHOaMNZMt53PMHNgXJ48F+IZfz Tc=; b=FNsl3AQLptu59InoWb4UhTZCspEItfJqVePlZh+j0NNXhL84z/sZfT41h QYQx08WavlqhjQQV7HInR5JYwfkTkFsPDWJAvkm7+hnxHLHJXwRuJzVthcOeauow iilubilSn6FCj0AaeyKbBxZYq5/EVUYknP+CtYpIMxj0DFpTIGdVHT5FdhbUasor bWa2TzEHwr6wMkONu3kF9Y3eEftbW0CW0zeBZPsttoKUUk4+MEpd89LonMpD7Sfy LVRV9OHskSxm8kTAT5X1G7YFxksbGZpp87sWjiH0Fli2BLbfMPfbMlQg6Tfvc8fd KBZ78d+/au2ZOYL9kvc/VM+aPEcEw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgeeggdehiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 454293065C56; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:29:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: akhil.goyal@nxp.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, Savinay Dharmappa Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 04:29:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4223016.LvFx2qVVIh@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200306070825.19424-1-savinay.dharmappa@intel.com> References: <20200305071523.30952-1-savinay.dharmappa@intel.com> <20200306070825.19424-1-savinay.dharmappa@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] test/ipsec: measure libipsec performance X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/03/2020 08:08, Savinay Dharmappa: > test app to measures the performance of libipsec > api rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto and rte_ipsec_pkt_process. Please make sentences in commit logs. > Signed-off-by: Savinay Dharmappa > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev > --- > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ F: lib/librte_ipsec/ > M: Bernard Iremonger > F: app/test/test_ipsec.c > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst > +M: Savinay Dharmappa > +F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c > M: Vladimir Medvedkin > F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c > F: app/test-sad/ Repeating what I said on v3: Having one different maintainer per test file is quite ridiculous. The maintainers of a lib are expected to maintain the related tests.