From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF224CA1 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:21:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BEC20DB2; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 04:21:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 04:21:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=VDfGkZwZhe4gbzEN418uzCUhgN vwcYS2o3LLvM3TYfA=; b=W8jCQq1bgqS6pr9yhSYpL7hVwwIwPPIlvFl6pZy6sa VB7iW6vXLQ91Dw+xiTV6aA0lJve3pSUVrqShuzHVjJA436q0mp4NnM+cmMxMa9Vg mas7gBUn7THAadTvLIU2+l4BLQlidT0Ds/Ni6o0DK8i4C1FTXtUp6cxlIeS9rMCy A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=VDfGkZ wZhe4gbzEN418uzCUhgNvwcYS2o3LLvM3TYfA=; b=LuBWbjaKA0Ur7BVIER3/PJ MG/llvlJaxFvtL1TXuEWJ9PByE7rAIupJXuZwnKk8Fsoi0SpABlpFStmsEnirnjM PeeMt0ZqVoHZfQRYmGSfWJY/kRkL7xUWprnSysfZxQGbg7ab1MO9OVdj+wotJCNw fViMOadwU+KBTtS6LnPXRT74Uc85wjpvA0X4diB6tjUHoJus3BQzrdyKE77FzSjH fFQr19z4T+jnked++TR4fKP56Ikf3WA06rftImFCaGhZ/pzsnu0Ns8NOsiz+kTnZ 3PYzBrefjqRu3+hLo9i2yT2xEp89prRMg+e/Q1UOjXEHd9szVcvuCeP2UqUC9kIw == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F3BF22417F; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 04:21:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Arnon Warshavsky Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, declan.doherty@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, Bruce Richardson , ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:21:26 +0100 Message-ID: <4227625.3KJ1syXLso@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <1521581285-4709-1-git-send-email-arnon@qwilt.com> <1645860.rB6cz0fKiK@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: replace rte_panic instances to return an error value X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:21:51 -0000 21/03/2018 00:04, Arnon Warshavsky: > > > > You are talking about API, and I agree the old applications can keep > > considering the functions as void. > > But I was talking about ABI, meaning: can we use an old application > > without recompiling and update only the DPDK (in .so file)? > > > > > > You are right of course. Once again I mixed the two.. > I will modify accordingly I don't know what needs to be modified. I think the first step is to clearly identified the different kind of changes by splitting your patch. Then we will decide how to integrate them.