From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E926D68D0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 00:05:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id w60so3465336wes.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 09 May 2013 15:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=cHcxkuJo+xsodz1m5ev5BakqnKsIG0pmWnruLhbeE2A=;
 b=SFknmG7hhm6m6dw5WEnM0KGfv2FnBXVDQ+1LwUM/TvG2YD+dcwuZWVqF4ATT1ZzWxu
 pALxqhjUVlsvmYW/5OaxVzvlbDkY2TLppqMBNfLAI8XuOHRaCv5pDl4gjdxefY5kD98J
 33356V947yPPntOHHeehrkOkWW+HVUYE9IfxbX+Yxi2Kkd7yQdkHMCQv6pKfDv+PLpJa
 J3oe6UQgdCB7DvCAxN1/bqKSdcR2ZQjzQvge0nrepLVHa/Py4zRTX6yfyJlMvvDV2cl/
 Qax+Epb9XPUBZD0F7Mh2sQT0ly1dFms3s5QCB4HN+frZ1DTN1XciQ6n+JKB0lc2baDvR
 /yHg==
X-Received: by 10.194.24.38 with SMTP id r6mr20750879wjf.50.1368137123639;
 Thu, 09 May 2013 15:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from x220.localnet ([80.215.0.142])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a4sm3713wic.5.2013.05.09.15.05.21
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 09 May 2013 15:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Alberto_Pereira_de_Ara=FAjo?=
 <j.pereira.araujo@viaquanta.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 00:05:28 +0200
Message-ID: <4229464.gbYy6pVKrG@x220>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.1 (Linux/3.7.10-1-ARCH; KDE/4.10.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <518BBB2D.5080101@viaquanta.com>
References: <518BBB2D.5080101@viaquanta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJqw38E8zmZe4Hzh63N6a1ZUmnmA7N8e9FdSuYHMtQoMO7B0RijKatmATtxayg529BEKNp
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Problems with testpmd
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:05:23 -0000

Hello,

09/05/2013 16:05, Jo=E3o Alberto Pereira de Ara=FAjo :
> Cause: No probed ethernet devices
[..]
> I have a board with 6 Gigabit ethernet ports (82574L) with the latest=

> driver from intel.

As you can see in lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h,
the NIC 82574L is not supported in this version.
Without extension, DPDK 1.2.3 supports only NIC families IGB and IXGBE.=

But the device 82574L is known to be part of family e1000e.

For the record, here is a list of Intel NIC families:
- e1000 (8254x)
- e1000e (82571..82574, 82583, ich8..ich10, pch..pch2)
- igb (82575..82576, 82580, i210, i211, i350, dh89xxcc)
- ixgbe (82598..82599, x540)

--=20
Thomas