From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126D3A0597; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 23:01:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E621C257; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 23:01:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158471C24B for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 23:01:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1042E47E; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:01:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Apr 2020 17:01:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=8VLCuzdXC2Za4d0PUm1G4bwwVsjRdP3cs1VqRFxD+Wc=; b=RKB7JOIobYlT 03N2KJ0NocwSvwl86iNqkTB6eQNObP5ThwHBIZJbcGHIr/Hl62BtCl35Rnu9driQ e7sxwQyskG5+w6hD7t77Qwyz0LwX5P9yGaSMFlJyCjdknteJj/JuMqZhTL1wwQ2Z PIcAKxn/TZ6NEGaZ5nuNxDqtxVRQ9YQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=8VLCuzdXC2Za4d0PUm1G4bwwVsjRdP3cs1VqRFxD+ Wc=; b=2XRzG0XbtvoZfFkIyhC6HvnN28jaDj8H1fMjOTu6+4xWuPpKlYmW2mnO3 uTBPlgZZ/ms3PLkIxxCH5yDr39iar6sGb5Nze/NhOSdkinMSUa14PXkr9i6JXEh6 pjC2JDTnKtSObm9PMOJmRuku+bcSo+MG4/6iiXQPykVrMw/AO3YcD8LoP5F0Ipdr 3oUN+SI3PFaM9p9tWYI1NcZWh/cwRmQTLFJlsexmScPXoSIhOaFehwje8n7FP7KL CosUVjQKwfnHiU6B7yn1PxOFzJvrNZRwfiP+zG6/huzPGvWaRwoQixp3QdoPJlc3 zLXi5bk1Uu9YhcLK+qLmMA4JwZVcg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrvddtgddtiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffoh hmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ECB7E3280068; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:01:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Muhammad Bilal Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 23:01:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4235574.Wku2Vz74k6@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] First the test fail and than get passed X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/04/2020 15:50, Muhammad Bilal: > About 2 days ago, I submitted a patch for a Bug 353. And I saw that > "iol-testing" failed on patchwork for "openSUSE" Environment. Today I > checked and it shows all the tests are passed [ > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-April/124201.html]. Is this > normal that first the test fail and than get passed? Yes it was an infrastructure issue, resolved recently: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/2020-April/000583.html