From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B028842989; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:09:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C7540A79; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:09:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EB24021F for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:09:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8914E320097C; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:09:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:09:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1681906144; x=1681992544; bh=WkqrwrFgrQqeuO3fP/H9wyBsbpWUhPnWS0W eLGdumFY=; b=CwDOYA0nG9YGpTQyA+I/MF3xSq/kfugDz35cQbBC8T7AE7xQPUu zLkhXmIt1EILe6CP5AcO1WGwEaMsZecKrS7dUssGXalUm0vKuvYlD52mi2ueYQHW n4urZgebeJuNC1h7dtbgqnhRF24mZA2L1bCXb1BTJjlN9b91RXalc1vD2GdH+H9s SV+e5ZLrsHh9+U7iKitr8ExTZpI90uN04fPtV2Ka6OREA2IwI9iJzbQn0fK0oO3b 8lIJBANIPze9NcVkfjG63vC+Y4u7jKxePJzcGjAloIi552sWSmc3//EDHDGg7g1l 90/yeLR0TaFbLg7zuYfyrc2Rhy9A6ujgTXA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1681906144; x=1681992544; bh=WkqrwrFgrQqeuO3fP/H9wyBsbpWUhPnWS0W eLGdumFY=; b=PycogElJipNPw+o3FbyIeJsGu2njuVIlRDU3RNkGMsjMklnzBfo xbpb/RCPvsGkg7Cl5Z0xhbXa44aER2cu3ufng2pLBPp06vlKctv8wROgP0XldZRJ ow+KAKWqjkurphkhKyVkmgIbDuYbqmJjlm+Bn797YlWXaLRtolJFoot5UltivVkU rqXv1dvapw4D6uCYP/VXXhlvDbrMV5qhcQLYs2aaGXI1cYskjVs/Nnu6QxpRYuSR kpVxSLJuVKlS+EC6QpgbI1Xv6QSQ9texS/G0wozfVLx310Bbnua6Il2dLWHFDpRT Dj6Yrx3E80/7MZxLykpU8bjJWeNnJvoQ73Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfedttddggeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqh ertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghs sehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedttdeljeejgeffke ekkedtjeevtdehvedtkeeivdeuuedvieduvdelveejueejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonh drnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:09:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: wangzengyuan Cc: Tyler Retzlaff , "dev@dpdk.org" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , luyicai , "zhangxu (BA)" Subject: Re: Consult the official release version of dpdk-kmod Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:09:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4259594.ejJDZkT8p0@thomas> In-Reply-To: <0c5b8f2d30074739b4cbaf1a15fdc3d2@huawei.com> References: <26c9dfede0b94debb082504c76e1e45c@huawei.com> <20230412152303.GC6257@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> <0c5b8f2d30074739b4cbaf1a15fdc3d2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, I don't know what should be a release of dpdk-kmod. When to have a new tag? About your need for Linux, there is only igb_uio which is considered as dep= recated. It is better replaced with VFIO (note there is a no-iommu option). Why do you really need igb_uio? 13/04/2023 15:14, wangzengyuan: > Dear Tyler Retzlaff, >=20 > Thank you for reply.=20 >=20 > We are using Linux and would like to inquire about the release versions o= f dpdk-kmod. Could you kindly provide us with this information, or direct u= s to the appropriate channels to find it? >=20 > Thank you for your assistance. >=20 > Best regards, > Zengyuan Wang >=20 > -----=E9=82=AE=E4=BB=B6=E5=8E=9F=E4=BB=B6----- > =E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roretzla@linux.micros= oft.com]=20 > =E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=B6=E9=97=B4: 2023=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5 = 23:23 > =E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA: wangzengyuan > =E6=8A=84=E9=80=81: dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net; david.marchand@red= hat.com; luyicai ; zhangxu (BA) > =E4=B8=BB=E9=A2=98: Re: Consult the official release version of dpdk-kmod >=20 > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:34:28PM +0000, wangzengyuan wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > We are honored to use dpdk and dpdk-kmod, two outstanding open source s= oftwares. However, according to the company's open source software usage st= andards, only officially released versions can be introduced as open source= software. As far as I know, there is no official release of dpdk-kmod. Can= the community release an official version for users? >=20 > are you asking about the linux or windows components? i can speak to plan= s for the windows components if that's what is being asked. >=20 > >=20 > > Thank you for your time. > >=20 > > Yours sincerely > >=20 > > Zengyuan Wang >=20