From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB702BE9 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:27:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c200so283453345wme.0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:27:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=Ble5S4GMrFQJRSvVqHy0duwDVPGj15YE0oinUOWM8mU=; b=IqomJwoRp2SuCrtJMbHdoadr45sfnDtWDpwH1e7L832HmbBwjVlJ/MzQUyAhhz6BeX D8Z6wkmGcgLTpWub4FOl1A98F0dyMxN344rG8er7hPKAthvNNMgpmKkiMARnyGpwtR5G MwAoAFQqG7WmeWz1eZ80dFPdXt/zLxeZZWxdOZsIDPJ5lBptr/BvK089fQjZ9jsQGEOo KAoUsvaZ7yOoxJd28wVVBqzB+YDE6pZhoAhsEVc2jzzkFcqqqP4kI3sZ8vjXhq3fG7Qd eGv6SZHCcWXm7h3nIs9J6LGIUmZl2NLibzaiLpr+e39MsiPmXN2tLKJVNBJnaWtMalqU +iMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=Ble5S4GMrFQJRSvVqHy0duwDVPGj15YE0oinUOWM8mU=; b=fjrJPkHg8SRgBvKUr8cmdUOS0zXWJNDiNLmf3vVLk1wTs7DTzgDT0XbvRfBSIuI58L WBk9XLqmeDiOquTtDPkq9borNTfhs8LYARPVtDeJJdGaL4wSJ/k2hJlFEN1Dw++BeOR8 T0MWUGQstEWYxqjMMrCL6AWhGk52tAO+Oaa9QKgV/ZrcS2S892WYimEuWpogU0RxvM3l XKIO9vj4P01louc+DBIbdD4tezFVN8wknfUn/XGtjcd69wZ3zgoPWM0x2STcWCeW8R4s GIWGxEbOwu9TiuZqEpwmS7AvnwzLNK5sHuYaCidBUJGwwXympgbeXbmkhVyMsVOPx6ar 9cYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTfMztRsee0HC2aLu26TsxjgXr7Z5kxKFKIwCe2NMliy+nP29fqzLAHT4RS/ZQyj6gK X-Received: by 10.28.212.85 with SMTP id l82mr26135604wmg.82.1456338426224; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:27:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (171.36.101.84.rev.sfr.net. [84.101.36.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e19sm32502025wmd.1.2016.02.24.10.27.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:27:05 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Pattan, Reshma" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:25:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4332341.KWFTSukzC1@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AE1AF8@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1450873172-21932-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> <1452011698-27354-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AE1AF8@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] fix RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_ERR_RET RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:27:06 -0000 > > From: reshmapa > > > > Patches 1 and 2 removes RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_ERR_RET and > > RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET macro usage from rte_ether and rte_cryptodev libraries to allow API > > access to secondary process. > > > > Patch 3 allows users to configure ethdev with zero rx/tx queues, but both should not be zero. > > Fix rte_eth_dev_tx_queue_config, rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_config to allocate memory for rx/tx queues > > only when number of rx/tx queues are nonzero. > > > > v3: > > * Removed checkpatch fixes of lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h from patch number 1. > > > > Reshma Pattan (3): > > librte_ether: remove RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_ERR_RET and > > RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET > > librte_cryptodev: remove RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET > > librte_ether: fix rte_eth_dev_configure > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev Applied with these titles: - ethdev: allow full control from secondary process - cryptodev: allow full control from secondary process - ethdev: support unidirectional configuration Please see how it is more informative without using the macros or function names. The title must reflect the intent, not the details. Thanks