From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1AEA04B5; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:21:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF708C916; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:21:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D856AC864 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:21:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 988897F4AC; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:21:31 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 988897F4AC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1603966891; bh=qHVwFXaQZb3SXjQxr1JdySc1uHzA1YJjbWqE3ezUYlo=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=E8h/HbbF/DWIB8tk9JNHPEr42I/E8cFwt43RAwrT5ODTNGj4DZkP1bKZeKoUWvMTk erN/TpOoZ4Ap+qiTr/bPhA0oriV9vZnqY/7potsfifYUE9FoqUHpvztzlj/vnKnPnu eMZARElDM9lkh3C9kid0pLRrEAr8BwkpyFxMlhQ0= To: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, jerinj@marvell.com, viacheslavo@nvidia.com, John McNamara References: <20201029092751.3837177-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20201029092751.3837177-14-thomas@monjalon.net> From: Andrew Rybchenko Organization: OKTET Labs Message-ID: <4344b79a-7630-c5b0-f622-1d3afbc9d8de@oktetlabs.ru> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:21:31 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201029092751.3837177-14-thomas@monjalon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/15] examples/rxtx_callbacks: switch timestamp to dynamic field X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/29/20 12:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > The mbuf timestamp is moved to a dynamic field > in order to allow removal of the deprecated static field. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > examples/rxtx_callbacks/main.c | 12 +++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/examples/rxtx_callbacks/main.c b/examples/rxtx_callbacks/main.c > index b9a98ceddc..4798e0962c 100644 > --- a/examples/rxtx_callbacks/main.c > +++ b/examples/rxtx_callbacks/main.c > @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ > #define MBUF_CACHE_SIZE 250 > #define BURST_SIZE 32 > > +static int hwts_dynfield_offset = -1; > +#define HWTS_FIELD(mbuf) (*RTE_MBUF_DYNFIELD(mbuf, \ > + hwts_dynfield_offset, rte_mbuf_timestamp_t *)) > + Why is approach here differs? Macro vs inline function.