From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698B4A0A0B; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 23:38:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6A7160655; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 23:38:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FCF40693 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 23:38:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8281E5C0159; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:38:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 17:38:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= xdN0g9Cu1uNjfNcydZCvwDgLv6I3Fw8Ppqxhb62GjvA=; b=iJ2jnRO3yEVLEGg6 RkBaHTBFDNp9wfh1Izs/qXMJtjy+hUWsrlnL19ytW07iuOYMs+KbeV0YiIo8EZRI g4/mY+KFmBUhI1ku21B4xwHumTt3PyVh66dpvcf8nEXmgt64+lHKh8ktTLAFWQyj bprRxGfhBwZtzDTIWuEwp04EnwwRWOigv63CPsrK21QmlbR74t36Tlo7ITqrMqhQ FHOiTAriUw9/RaukeQKVxFBmZpd3Jvk9wV7M/iRrG1O6vumOJa1lC3Bjoyu5rKAW sAh+1qxdMIxIaRQ3YLEX/ReQBiMztyE3seBTjE68mYVWa65W6QfhopHLl+zBZDM3 Fa9ERA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=xdN0g9Cu1uNjfNcydZCvwDgLv6I3Fw8Ppqxhb62Gj vA=; b=iKR3WvcalUZ5ydsqJCTmzzib4Dt+Vg33wvpS5BCHekIsH9Vx65thozDyV bhh4UdZBJQmoMYYv+JSxCYljdkHjP4PkKMsOFHteq04CkPNnec8XgtaxI3UoKhEv F86OwmDKY9FqC4s0u6Q0luyOgIJg4pEo5isvDX5Ys9Jfq5YWAUz62HjY2AzaSkLd KsBZU3lEHw6YQwhj9JI3wYd9iKQwWyODYR4zuhG6fByGHPhBOUSUmflGUtellxEL RAThEO3GMe0mliXbswOrhppwVC2t0AlzDdJyKcNJy+yXdBgDuqlj5m+wziiKksuK wB8vf72/1VEkmFgVHQ6NsUigE/utQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeekgdduhedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3701224005B; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:38:43 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ajit Khaparde Cc: dpdk-dev , Asaf Penso , John McNamara Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 23:38:42 +0100 Message-ID: <4346751.o6iUqhNVCn@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1610304247-11455-1-git-send-email-asafp@nvidia.com> <20210201221333.2062052-1-thomas@monjalon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] doc: add release milestones definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 01/02/2021 23:31, Ajit Khaparde: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:13 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > From: Asaf Penso > > > > Adding more information about the release milestones. > > This includes the scope of change, expectations, etc. > > > > Signed-off-by: Asaf Penso > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > Acked-by: John McNamara > > Looks good to me. Can we add a mention somewhere that under some > circumstances an rc5 may be required or the rc enumeration could > change in some rare case, like when we had to spin a new rc during > 20.11? Yes good idea.